Feature Requests

I am using some UAD plugins in Premiere Pro.  LA-2A and 1176 for dialog leveling.  Not editing in Audition, just in the track mixer in Premiere.   UAD DSP is not being released when i delete or bypass plugins.  I need to close the project or restart Premiere to release the DSP from my UAD Apollo. Also, all sequences in the project are pulling DSP regardless if they are open or not.  So if i create too many subclips with 2 plugins, i will be a DSP overload error.   any way to get premiere to release DSP when the effect is bypassed like it does in Logic?    

I'd like to see better options for the metadata plugin.- A font picker- Ability to set alignment per line so we can have elements stay centered, left or right aligned from their set positions.- Add option to display the Sequence Name. This is practical if the file name gets lost in translation.

Let's discuss a phenomenon, a familiar sting in the tail of many of our editing sessions.I'm referring to the art of setting an output point at the end of a clip, expertly skipping along with the use of arrows.It's quite routine for us to scroll through our edits, checking every clip, and indeed, that extra frame when navigating clips proves useful for previewing. But here's where the drama unfolds.This method, though handy, can become a thorn in our side when setting an output point. Optimistically, we may assume that using arrows can get us quickly to the end of our edit. But then Adobe, in its infinite wisdom, adds an extra frame for the sake of previewing, and suddenly, we're staring down a black frame.This problem is noticeable when rendering RGB, but it becomes a serious headache when alpha channels come into play.It's not uncommon to find ourselves scrambling back to the editing suite during a broadcast rehearsal because an unexpected black frame has crashed our intro or outro.I

Would be convenient to be able to enter a value when a keyframe is double clicked, even when that keyframe is not at the current time.

Premiere is a pretty amazing program and whenever a workflow seems unduly complicated, there's usually a better way to do it.   Now it's possible the following workflow is obvious to many of you, but it wasn't to me as I usually used pluraleyes (which is no longer supported and I can't seem to get it to work anymore).   I've been working a great deal recently with multicamera material on a number of projects.   Today I was synching a 2 camera shoot with audio also recorded with a zoom digital audio recorder.  The 2 cameras started and stopped a couple of times while the zoom recorded continuously.  I selected all the camera clips and the zoom audio in the project panel and control clicked and chose "create multi camera source sequence" and used the audio to synch.   I then double clicked the new multicam clip to load it in the source monitor, and then control clicked on it in the program panel and chose "open in timeline."  I parked bot

Please restore videotape Capture function for Adobe Premiere 2023 Silicon version.We know the capture mode is available when opening Premiere in Rosetta Intel mode but we need to utilise Silicon version.Videotape capture is a critical feature for our archival work.

Hello, I often work on multicam projects, with quite a few cameras (sometimes up to 32 cameras), which is challenging for computer, even when proxies are made.  For example, a project with 16 cameras in multicam edit, these are grid sources 4x4 and a preview next to it. Thinking logically...the computer uses resources to play 16 sources and scale all 16 to a smaller size and separately play one of them in "full quality" preview. My idea is, when we switch to multicam to have option like " render and replace" this 4x4 cameras source . The benefits are: 1. Save Time: Instead of waisting time for creating 16 proxy files, we will render, only 1 "multicam render and replaced source". 2. Easy working on computer: Instead of playing 16 sources+1 preview, computer will play this 1 "multicam render and replaced source" + 1 selected camera will be played. When I start to work on project I know for sure how many camera I want to view in multicam. 2x2, 3x3,

El cambio en las ventanas para importar y exportar de las ultimas versiones son tan malas que me dan ganas de pasarme a otra app.

It should be a very simple solution . just give us option to play multiple video tracks simultaniously. Editing multi camera sequence in premier pro sucks. It is very complicated and very few controls and lot of issues.I just need simple multi-camera tracks playback.Any solution ?

As shown in my screenshot below, when opening up a layer the clips in that layer have the opacity keyframes ready to go and be keyframed (yay?). However, I personally find this completely useless, as I prefer to use other methods to change opacity 95% of the time. As I edit a lot of sports, I often have 200+ clips from a game that I need to time remap most of them, and I have to keyframe opacity on none of them. You can imagine how this is a nightmare, as I have to individually go through on every single clip and right click it to change the keyframing to time remapping.   My feature request is simple: in the timeline preferences inside premiere, just give us an option to change the default keyframes such as motion, opacity, or time remapping, or just the same make it so we can highlight multiple clips in our timeline and still be able to Rick Click > change keyframing options > time remapping, because currently that option is not there if you select more than one clip at a

Hi Adobe,Recently I've been using third party tools such as timebolt/Recut to create rough cuts, now that the text-based editing is in-built in Premiere, it still lacks some key features that could make the huge difference such as identity and remove all the pauses in one click. Also having the option to choose the threshold and padding for silences manually would be a great addition as well, gives us that much more freedom. Hope that you guys consider this.Thanks 🙂

That simple.Maybe have the another command for render selection effects only if you want to distinguish it? I don't think many editors use the effects only render though, I think the mayority just renders all.The yellow clips preview when using Optical Flow, for example, isn't good enough, it show jerky. You need to see them fully render in green to see them properly. Same as the time remapping effects.

I would really appreciate if there was a way to enlarge the text in the transcription and captions panel.I do both for English and Spanish for the medical explainer videos I make and on a 4K monitor, the text size is getting too small for this 52 year old eyes.

When playing back fullscreen, it's always really annoying to have to move the cursor out of the way.  Other NLE's do so, and it'd be great if PP did it too.

テキストパネル→グラフィックで特定のワードを検索した時に一括選択できる機能がほしいです。 ※グラフィックはエッセンシャルグラフィックのことです。 タイムライン上で、特定のワードを含んだエッセンシャルグラフィックを別のトラックに移動させるために、この機能を実装させて頂きたいです。  ↓DeepL translation tools I would like to have the ability to select a batch of search terms when I search for a specific word in the Text Panel -> Graphics. *Graphics are essential graphics. We would like to have this feature implemented in order to move Essential Graphics that contain specific words to a different track on the timeline. Wanted.

I have just noticed that in Premiere the "Balanced Male Voice" preset has been renamed to "Balanced Low Tone Voice," and female to "High Tone." This is a downgrade in user experience and clarity of use. Both men and women have higher and lower tones of voice, the distinction between male and female is greater than "higher and lower." This could cause confusion and lead to poor audio mixing for those of a given sex with an atypical voice, for example a man with a higher tone voice that would still be better suited towards the low tone setting (compared to a female his voice is still quite low). The previous wording was much clearer, and more useful! If the concern was related to inclusivity, I hardly see erasing the recognition of average sex differences as inclusive or useful, and again, with this software being a tool functionality should be at the core of every such decision. Something to consider! Thanks! 

フィードバックです。 ２０年以上プレミアを使っておりますが他メーカに乗り換えを考えるほどテキストの編集がしづらいです。レガシータイトルの時はよかったのですがエッセンシャルに変わってから操作が改悪しております。 具体的には〇テキスト編集画面が別エディター画面として開かないのでテキスト編集時に画面を大きくして作業ができない（ワークスペースを都度変える必要があるため効率が悪い）〇テキストをテンキーの十字キーで移動・微調整ができない。これは致命的です。 改善をお願い致します。

I am just hoping that someone in the know has a work around.  I have used the Change to Color effect for many of my projects.  I just upgraded to a brand 2023 MacBook Pro M2 BUT the issue is from what I can tell is Adobe has gotten rid of the "change to color" effect.  That was a pretty powerful plugin that I am hoping is being considered to be reinstalled.  Anyone have a good workaround?

When working with transitions in the timeline, if I resize the track to be big (so, for example, I can see the details of an audio waveform) any transitions also grow to a ridiculous size, partially obscuring what's behind them. It'd be nice if, when embiggening a track, the transitions grew only to a certain size, then remained at that size, exposing more of the track details behind it. Nobody needs a transition to be this big:Something like this would be a lot more civilised:  

Something needs to be done about the blue "frames need analyzed" bar that shows up whenever I change a clip with warp stabilizer. I've run into way too many instances where I export my video and publish it to youtube only to realize that there's an error code burned into the clip. I do realize this is user error and I could just double check the file before or after export but it's easy to miss something like that when you're skimming through an hour+ video. I think it would be a good idea to at least leave the clip unstabilized in the exported file, or allow for an error message that pops up before export showing that there is stabilization that needs to be analyzed. An unstabilized file is a lot more discreet to a viewing audience rather than an error message.

Would be great to see these included with the transcriptions in some brackets or something like that.

HI! I work on several projects at the same time and  I render mp4, mp3, mov etc. It would be great to create a smart rendering option, so that  Media Encoder, Premiere and After Effects would remember specific folders, and names and would suggest the same export format. Thanks!

I have been having some bad issues where premiere would crash on project load, again and again. I finally went what I consider the nuclear route and deleted all cache files and preferences and now Premiere is back to a modicum of stability but it will take literally hours for it to rebuild all of the .pek files. Also resetting all of my preferece changes takes me 5-10 min and is really annoying.  My overall question is why is the cache always causing Premiere Pro to be so unstable in the first place? No other app that I know of has this rickety of a system where one corrupted cache file brings the whole house down. Why is there a preference, (best of luck tracking down which one is causing a crash) that causes the whole app to crash! Something is fundementally wrong here and the answer to troubleshooting can't always be to start a process that can be hours long.  This is the second time in a month where i've had to nuke the entire cache just to get the software work

I often make content cuts whenever a speaker stutters, and with my process, that usually means making a cut on a nested sequence. It could be nice if there was a way to see which parts of a sequence are being used. Any nested sequence in a master sequence would have markers within the nest with what parts of it are being used. It would also have the timecode of the master sequence in those markers. 

Scrubbing and Fast Forwarding performance is often painfully slow. Here's an example by Jayme Cowley Media Co. of scrubbing performance in Pr vs Resolve: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilPUc22itSA. The associated FR he posted mentions the problem but doesn't offer any specific solutions. Here are 3 ideas that could greatly enhance scrubbing and fast forwarding in Pr: SCRUBBING/FF RESOLUTION: In addition to being able to set the Payback and Paused Resolution in the Source/Program Monitor's wrench menus, it would be great to also be able to specify the resolution that's used when scrubbing or Fast Forwarding in the Timeline or Source Monitor. This setting would be variable, meaning that setting it to 1/4 resolution, for example, would scrub/play the footage at a variable resolution between Full all the way down to 1/4, depending on how well one's computer can keep up. (see Image 1)DYNAMICALLY IGNORE EFFECTS: A new setting in the Timeline's wrench menu could allow Pr to dy