Questions

Hi Just wondering if anyone can recommend a place to source free (cost and royalty) audio snippets from? I'm looking for a 5-10 (maximum) second snippet to use in the opening scene of a short explainer video.We are happy to purchase audio if needed but thought I would ask what other people do...?Many thanksKim

2019, nothing happened within Premiere Pro 2019? seems as my borther is right - i should change the software, that is really crap! shame on you Adobe! ...and for this, i pay 30 bucks every month.. pain in the ass....

13.1.1 just came out. I wonder if it will fix all of the issues in 13.1 (there's a lot)? Ah, I'll wait for 13.1.2 and let the next round of beta testers find the errors in 13.1.1. Fixed issues in Premiere Pro versions 13.1.1 and 13.1

Adobe Premiere Pro Learn & Support

Agree. Completely unprofessional

If it weren't for Dynamic Link, I'd take a serious look at Resolve.I think you should anyway.  Version 15.3.1 is pretty stable, and you get the equivalent of Premiere Pro, After Effects, SpeedGrade and Audition all in one program, no 'linking' needed.

Hello Everyone.I have the Sony PXW-Z150 4K XDCAM Camcorder.B&H Photo VideoAlso, I have a few Canon 5D's. I always wanted to have a Cinema Camera, Because I have many Canon L-Series Lenses. In the past, I have used my Canon 5d with 70-200 L Lens, and I got some good results. I can not get the Look  I want with my Sony Z150, because It's of Fixed Lens. Offcourse, for Run and Gun situations, It's a good camcorder to zoom in/out quickly.  Canon C100 Mark || is a great camera, but  It does not shoot In 4K, and to Purchase a Canon Cinema Camera that Shoots 4K, the next step Is C200, and It's very Expensive. I want to purchase the C100 Mark ||  but I want to make sure It Is the right choice or not. What you guys think about this.Thank you very much.

Ditto, how about you all stop putting out beta software!

YEEEEAAAAAAHHHHH !!!!What about the bugs, what about the multiprocessing, what about GPU acceleration. NOTHING. WE PAY 60 euros for NOTHING. It's time to switch to fusion or anything else.I am so bored with your update ecstasies. You pilled new stuff without correcting anything.Just hate you guys and your shareholders.Have a good day

Same problems, couldn't edit due to lag. Switching to DaVinci Resolve

Why are you bashing apple? Everything worked just fine, until adobe broke it.

Adobe just deleted my complaint presumably because they don't want anyone — all over their precious new update that ruins playback/exporting for users. Great company ethics, bury the truth.Moderator note: Warning. Please refrain from using profanity. We have users under 18 reading these posts and it is against our community guidelines. Thanks.

It's time to get away from Adobe. Check out DaVinci Resolve. I've heard from countless others it's WAY better. And it's FREE. The free version may have some limitation however and uses the default OS H.264 codec decoder (I think) so H.264 may drag a bit with the free version. The paid version is only a one time fee of $300. Or, get the full version free with the purchase of a black magic camera!!! As soon as I get through this last project I'm getting away from Adobe for good. I've been using it for 14 years and it's just ridiculous to keep paying for something over and over, esp. just to have it break over and over. Everyone online, like on YouTube, talking about making the switch to DR away from Premiere says they wish they did it sooner and they're very happy with the switch. Most do it because of the CC subscription model is robbery and plagued with ongoing issues.

shot with an iPhone

I am looking for a tutor to help me transition from Premiere Elements to Premiere Pro.   I live in northeastern Illinois, approximately mid-way between Chicago and Milwaukee, and would be willing to travel to either city.

Telling someone that nobody else is having problems is a joke.  If people weren't having problems you wouldn't be seeing post like this to comment and the only thing Adobe people reply with is it's our workflow or computers.  The code is old and needs to be rebuilt from the ground up.  This isn't 1996 anymore so telling people they need to convert their 4k clips to 720 to be able to edit without problems is a joke.  IT'S 2019!  Ask the stockholders that love that subscription money how they will like it when we all move on to software that works.

- no support for High DPI monitors -  Neither program works perfectly when Display Scaling is set above 100%.  But that's not a problem.  The entire point of higher resolution is more screen real estate, so one should always leave Display Scaling at 100%.- very inflexible interface compared to Premiere - True, but this isn't an editing feature.  It doesn't prevent one from doing the job, it just means one may have to do things differently.  That's not unexpected when switching software.- very poor proxy support - How so?  I find the Optimized Media in Resolve works as well as Proxies in PP.- locked timeline frame rate - True, but how many RED projects will this be a problem for?- export frame rate locked to timeline frame rate - This isn't entirely true.  There is some flexibility here.  But again I ask, how many RED projects will this be a problem for?- no way to force cache render an individual clip if Resolve has decided it doesn't need render

I have been experimenting with Resolve for several months.  I have the free version.  I am going to use Premiere for Video Editing and Resolve for Color Correction.

I watched Jason Levine's video (How to Make Great Videos (Part 7) - Optimizing for Social Media | Adobe Creative Cloud - YouTube)  that touted a new feature that was in beta (The Social Publishing Panel) and finally decided to see if it could help us out since we're getting ready to start our own show to be featured on multiple social media platforms. After searching, I found pretty much nothing. As if it never existed. If not for the video above and this link (Slay on Social: Introducing the Social Publishing panel (beta) in Premiere Pro | Creative Cloud blog by Adobe​), I would have thought I suffered a case of the "Mandela Effect."What gives Adobe? Jason Levine?Thanks for any insight or alternative suggestions.Wally

Premier cc 2019, gtx1080 tiI can't use cuda.Gpu acceleration, which was used well in the gx1080, was removed from 2019.Not even the gtx1080ti that I bought and installed today.It's definitely supported gpu by Adobe.sick.I chose gpu acc.software encording-operated stupid.I'm going to finalcutbye.

So bRAW came out for the BMPCC4K and I realized it was only supported on Davinci Resolve.  Davinci Resolve 15 already had a bunch of game changing workflows that beat Premiere (mainly color) but they totally made their editing more like Premiere.  Now that I shoot bRAW and not .dng I pretty much have made the switch to Davinci over Premiere.  I suspect that I will keep Premiere around just in case I get sent some files that need to be edited in that workflow, but pretty much from here on out I'm using Davinci exclusively.  I hope to phase out Premiere completely by the end of the year.  This bRAW support was pretty much the nail in the coffin for me.  It's been out for months, why Premiere waited so long baffles me.  Oh well, see ya later hahahaha!

So, what finally worked for me was to uninstall PP 2019 and going back to 2 versions ago (latest 2018 release.) There are still some minor performance issues, but it works much better.Also, Kevin, I appreciate you posting a response here. Yet, I have to be honest and point out that I found your comment about this becoming a "dumping ground for unrelated performance issues" annoying. Please understand that those of us posting here are complaining, venting and looking for a solution for something Adobe has not been able to fix or help with. We are already frustrated and given that context, your comment was unecessary.

Adobe MUST make all Video Cards usable. This is getting ridiculous!!!I am sick and tired of doing a hack every time, just so I can use the GPU Mercury Engine, and I am sure thousands more out there, are pissed off about this as well. And now a days, the Cuda Supported Cards Text doesn't even exist, so that you can — your Video Cards!!!!Another great reason to move on over to Davinci.... I am really getting sick of Adobe. Really sick!!! Totally Sickening. If the card is not one that Adobe Tested, who cares???? Really who cares???Many cards work, but just because it is not a card that was tested, we have to continue coming up with new hacks, to use our Video Card???Again, I am getting really sick of some of the nonsense that Adobe does.Adobe removes plugins as well, without warning, and when you upgrade, the plugin no longer exists, and you have to get a dumb message every time you open up the project, that the plugin is not there. Anyway, GET YOUR ACT TOGETHER AT ADOBE, or I am moving o

Is there a better player for playing1920 x1080 or 4k Videos than VLC?

I recently realized that Panasonic Lumix Gh4 seems to shoot actually exactly in 24 fps according to the camera settings but most of the film I edited on 23.976 fps sequence settings timeline in Premiere Pro. Given that if I change the sequence settings from the current 23.976 fps sequence to the exact 24 fps sequence settings to match the video source footage of 24 fps or or even if I change the sequence from the current 23.976 to 29.97 fps, in both cases of changing the sequence settings frame rate I would need to reanalyze lot of clips ( I assume due to warp stabilizer or something else)  etc in the timeline for this film which requires quite a lot of work. So given that we might be selling this film on Amazon, Vimeo etc :1. Generally speaking  is it worth changing the sequence settings from the current 23.976 fps to 24 fps sequence settings to match the camera source video exactly but then the premiere pro asking me to reanalyze lot of clips on the timeline if I conduct th