Stock Contributors

AdobeStockにベクターファイルをアップロードするとフォントが変更されてしまいます。 どなたか原因をお教えいただけませんでしょうか？   20240118-ap-Metalic_28.pdf / アップロードしたベクターファイル(※) 20240118-ap-Metalic_28.jpg / ベクターファイルから書き出したJPG画像 220_F.jpg / AdobeStockにアップロードした後のサムネイル画像   ※このフォーラムでは、AIファイルでアップロードできませんでしたので、PDFに変換しています。AdobeStockには、AIファイルでアップロードしました。   [アーティストの著作権を保護するため、モデレーターはオリジナルのベクターファイルを削除した。］

I've submitted AI photos to my vector account and created another account only for AI photos, because assets that were in review could not be deleted so I waited until the assets were approved and deleted it. Is it okay to reupload it or will my account get banned?

Hello: I will be concise with my question: is the result of scaling a generative image with AI (1456 x 816, for example) x4 times using Adobe express valid to be accepted by Adobe stock reviewers? Thanks in advance   [Moderator moved the thread to the correct forum]

Hello Community, I am here to post the issue regarding the activation of my account.Please check the below email I received a month ago.After replying couple of times but all went unanswered and I am still waiting and it has been more than a month.Can anybody help me regarding this?

I'm submitting almost 250+ images everyday and almost 120 or 100 images got declined by Adobe is there any impact on my account due to images declaration for example is there my account will block bcz of images declaration usually there's quality issues and soft focus issues occurs help me plzz will my account will ban due to it or not?? 

Did I do something wrong that caused 2 images to be rejected together?Point out the mistakes? please help me. I have attached 4 files please see. 1&2 FILE ACCEPT,3&4 IMAGE REJECTED (QUALITY ISSUES) Any kind of image upscaler app would be good?

Minhas imagens foram recusadas. Alegação:"Durante nossa análise, descobrimos há elementos que parecem estar protegidos pelas leis de propriedade intelectual, portanto, não podemos aceitá-los em nossa coleção. "Detalhe, sou fotógrafo e eu tirei todas as fotos que enviei.Realmente isso é muito revoltante.Algumas das fotos recusadas.Por favor revisem isso direito, nas minhas fotos tem até a minha logo.

Hello every one ,, is the Position per week in Time Frame is per no. of Downloads or Earnings ?

Va beh mi e stato disattivato il mio account Adobe Stock contributor senza un apparente motivo ma okay... so che dovro aspettare settimane, mesi e anni ahahha (spero di no) ma oltre questo o notato un dispositivo sconosciuto collegato dal  6 ottobre 2023 con posizione sconosciuta ma boh... comunque mi potete consigliare altri posti per vendere foto tanto che avevo gia altri contenuti e mi sono trovato la sorpresa con l'account disattivato  grazie

Is it possible to see photos of Adobe administrators who refuse to post photos without deep processing in Photoshop, Lightroom and other programs. But there is a lot of criticism and few facts

If you use Topaz Phot AI I wondering if you could answer the following: When I drag and drop an image into topaz photo AI…does it automatically correct my image without me doing anything else? After I drag and drop and it does it’s auto thing, the next step would be to save the image. Is that correct? Is that it? I don’t need to use the menu on the Right – I just drag and drop, Topaz automatically makes the fixes, so all that is left to do is for me to save the image to the upscale size I want? Other than overriding the automated fixes, what use is the menu on the right side for.

I regularly upload vector files in .ai  format to Adobe Stock and until now was adding titles and keywords manually.I wanted to speed up the process and used Adobe Bridge now to add keywords and titles to my files, but they don´t seem to be added automatically to Adobe Stock when I upload the files via web.I am also unable to use the "Publish" function in Bridge as for some reason it always shows me the error message saying my "files are unsupported by Adobe Stock"... I can still upload the same files manually though. Am I missing something here? How can I make metadata to upload with my .ai files to Adobe Stock?And why Bridge says that .ai format is unsupported? TIA

while the interest seems to be focused on this 'generative al',  I have photos that have been in review over 3 months. are the old fashioned pics gone out of style?

Hi, can someone assist me?I've generated AI images, which typically have a resolution of about 1024x1024 pixels.I've attempted to upscale them using 3 or 4 different methods, but unfortunately, all my submissions have been rejected due to artifact issues.Could anyone successfully share techniques or advice on upscale generative images for stock acceptance?thanks.

Love is like a beautiful flower that I may not touch, but its fragrance transforms the atmosphere into a delightful space.

No se que pasa pero ultimamente me estan rechazando imagenes con las mismas explicaciones "Los problemas comunes que pueden afectar la calidad técnica de las imágenes incluyen problemas de exposición, flou artístico, filtro excesivo o artefactos/ruido.".... yo no le encuentro nada de lo que dicen... adjunto una de ellas porque no veo que haya las explicaciones que me dan gracias !! 

I want to become a contributor but first I want to know - as a contributor, if someone who is on a 30 day free trail uses one of my images, how much do I get paid?I can't seem to get an answer to this question from Adobe Stock.

Hello All,Last night I submitted three images at once, which is rare for me. Before the submission would go through, I had to choose all the squares with kitty cats, to prove I was human. Is this new  (possibly to weed out problem accounts)? Or is it just the first time I've been subjected to the process?Thanks and have great days!

Hello, I have a question about editorial content: An example: I have a photo - NEW YORK CITY - Times Square. Lots of advertising, people. I cannot display the image for commercial use. So Editional - Adobe does not accept the images. Why? Are such images fundamentally rejected?   [moderator cured HTML error]

First time submitting and got rejected. Any tips and constructive suggestions on what I should work on for these images (all photos here were rejected)   

I always checked the second box when uploading AI images.Too late, I realized that I shouldn't be checking AI images of landscapes or food....I was deleting the already approved AI image because there was no way to edit it, but I saw that deleting a large amount at once could cause my account to be suspended.I wonder if it's okay to leave the wrongly checked approval image as it is.And I'm deleting the previously written keyword and title 'Generation AI' from the approved AI image one by one. Do I not need to modify this?

my photos are strange, because they're taken in a specific way.i mean when you look at them you think they are generate with AI but it's NOT. i mean i can accept the issues about guality and stuff like that but not that they were fixed by AI.if you could help me it will be my pleasure. here is some of my works for example :

These two landscape images were rejected for quality reasons.  Could you offer possible reasons for rejection. Thanks,

Hallo zusammen,wie genau ist das gemeint?"Reiche keine generativen KI-Inhalte mit Titeln ein, die eine tatsächliche Darstellung von Ereignissen mit Nachrichtenwert beinhalten."Beispiel Fotos von einem brennenden Wald mit Löschflugzeug - ist das erlaubt?Weil ja eigentlich alles Nachrichtenwert haben könnte.Selbst Lebensmittel kommen ja in den Nachrichten mal vor.

I've submitted a few AI designs -- some have been accepted and some denied, but I can't figure exactly why... can you help so I can know a little more about what to avoid? Thanks in advance!