Stock Contributors

Bonjour,Dans la FAQ à la question que deviennent les photos après 12 mois : possibilité que adobe renouvelle 12 mois. Oui ok...mais apres 24 mois, que deviennent elles ? Sont elles remises en collection payante ou supprimées définitivement ?Merci beaucoup !

I,ve uploaded these images twice. Second ones were sharper than the first but that hasn't resolved rejection issues. The blurring that is left is depth of field so there's not much I can do about that. Some idea of why they were rejected and how I fix this would be greatly received. I use Affinity Photo for enlarging and sharpening. 

Por favor y ahora donde estan los errores

Donde esta el fallo en esta foto?

Yes, support is not responding. They connected me to the relevant department and the relevant department does not say a single sentence. This is happened second time. I just asked a simple question about review time.So my question is this: Adobe help documents saying review time took 7 days. But today day 7.I sent images to adobe stock for selling. It is my first upload. think it's taking a long time because it's the first time upload. Images are waiting in review. No rejection, no approval. When does the process end? I am wondering.Here screenshots about your support...

   

Hello! Would love some feed back, these were rejected due to quality issues but maybe someone can point out the issues. Thanks! 

hello, please help me, I make portraits of fake people with the help of midjorney ai, I have a subscription there and can to commercial use, is that mean my images belong to me? and it even says that I can dispose of them as I want, adobe requires you to provide a property release, but I can't figure out what it means? midjourney does not give any papers to users personally, but the conditions are spelled out in the general rules. I have screenshots, who needs to sign this release for use? I ? because the images are belong to me. thanks, sorry maybe stupid question, I'm new here and I don't speak English well 

I am having problems logging into the ftp via Filezilla. Anyone else? Just says Cannot connect to server. My computer is up to date. Is there something I am missing? It worked fine just days ago 

I'm really likeing how my trial of Topaz Sharpen AI is giving my photos extra crispness, but are they more likely to get rejected in Stock Contributor? 

Hi, I'm new and these got rejected for qualitt issues even though they meet the requirements of 4+MP, lighting isn't too bright or dark, and pictures in focus. Thank you.

Hello guys,I recently started contributing videos and so far I had rejections only 10%. So to my suprise these two were rejected and I'm wondering why. Maybe it was rejected because camera has slight shaking due to steps over stairs. I wanted to film exactly that, moving over the stairs yet maybe shaking over stairs is not allowed. Do I need to have smooth transition with moving or there is some other issue I'm missing? Thanks

Fixed and Resubmitted for the 3rd time and rejected again. Are they really that bad?

Hi all.   I am a new contributor and looking to learn. I recently submitted this photo and it got rejected for quality reasons.  Could anyone help me understand why it got rejected? 

Hi all, thinking it is the soft focus for the rejection...would appreciate input. 

Bonjour, pouvez vous me dire pourquoi ces photos ont été refusée (problème de qualité) j'aimerai beaucoup les améliorer. Merci beaucoup !

Buenas, No sé qué estoy haciendo mal. He enviado un model release tanto en formato digital como en físico, pero no me lo aceptan.He puesto el nombre en mayúscula y la misma fecha en todas las firmas. 

Hello! I'm new to community and learning about the content creation to stock (I have been using stock photos for years though). I have checked out the rejected content people post here and I'm wondering if there the quality criteria is always the same. For example there is thousands of images of flowers, but significantly less photos of horse archery. Does the rarity (or other commercial value) effect to approval? I have a few photos with good composition and commercial value, but just desent quality due to older gear and action nature of the cituations the pictures were taken. If the subject of the photo doesn't affect, it really explains some situations where i have tried to find suitable stock image, but failed miserably.

Have a good time. I am a new author. I want to ask why all my works are rejected, although 90%+ are accepted at other streams? None of them passed, and I know for sure that they are not bad. Moreover, after the exam, I never received a message that I was not suitable as an author. For more than a week, several works during the day have been rejected. It seems to me that this is some kind of mistake. I want a real one more review of my works for further cooperation. Very disappointing. I hope for help with my problem.   [Moderator moved the thread to the correct forum]

Hello,I'm new as acontributor and I would like to undertand what should I do better to make Adobe accept my photos.From what I read I think it could be the dof too shallow? Composition?Or something else I'm not seeing?General info:- I didn't take them with the intention of putting them on Stock - I decided to try after- I did erase some traces of visible logos- The riginal files where 60MP but here I could upload only a smaller version- I know they are not perfect 🙂Thank you for your feedback,Silene

Hello, could you please help me to understand, why this AI image was rejected? What is wrong with the quality? 

Tell me how to correctly fill in the consent of the generated AI model, otherwise the first submission was incorrect. Thank you all in advance and sorry to bother you.

Hi, I am new to Adobe Stock, I have posted some photos but most of them have been rejected. I really would like to improve, can somone offer my a constuctive criticism to get better. The first two photos were rejected because of Intelectual Property, I wonder it was becase I used the name of the hotel even when thie building is not longer  hotel and have no bran label on it. Thank you very much for your support.

Ustedes perdonen pero en esta foto no entiendo la falta de calidad, no tiene ruido esta a ISO 100, no es una composicion, y no creo que el balance de blanco este tan mal, asi que porfavor ¿donde esta el fallo?. Ultimamente veo que muchos rechazos que otras agencias no me hacen. Lo siento pero es una obsevacion sin animo de ofender. Gracias.