Stock Contributors

I am unable to log in to Adobe Stock using either Microsoft Edge or Firefox browsers (Chrome works). Just wondered if this was a universal problem or known bug?Once my email address is entered and expecting to go to password the next page that pops up is shown in the atached image. Not related to Adobe and I'm not even sure if it is from my ISP since failure to accept the email password takes me to another page that indicates I'm trying to get into my Microsoft account!! Very confusing.And yet logging in using Chrome works fine. 

It occurs to me that a large percentage of the photos posted here as rejected for "technical reasons" were taken with cell phones. Would Adobe be better off requiring intact EXIF info in uploaded photos, and automatically rejecting those taken with cell phones and other small sensor devices? I know of at least one other agency that will not even consider photos unless they were taken with a "camera suitable for stock photography". Yes, I know it is possible to get acceptable photos with a cell phone under ideal conditions, and rejecting cell phone photos would reject some suitable images, but overall the reviewers would have to wade through fewer unacceptable images (reducing their workload and Adobe's overhead expenses), and a higher percentage of uploaded photos would be acceptable. Just a thought...

I'm trying to upload a video through Filezilla since yesterday, it shows that the transfer was successfully completed but the video does not appear in the tab for new material.I would be grateful if someone could help me

Hi,I have done a session with my model studying at dusk and at night in a room, so the images don't have too much light, and have been rejected with the following explanation: "Common problems that can affect the technical quality of images include exposure problems, artistic flou, excessive filtering or artifacts/noise." These photos were accepted in other agencies that are known to be very restrictive with no problems. I find the photos are not overedited, they don't have noise and the luminosity of the scene is the corresponding one to the idea I want to transmit. Thank you in advance! 

I've gotten rejections before, but never an entire batch of seven images at once. All seven were the first pictures I uploaded after getting a Tamron 70-200mm for my Canon 80D (I know...I need a newer camera). But I've had decent enough success uploading and getting accepted images using my 80D with other lenses. Oddly, the Tamron 70-200mm is the most expensive and highest quality lens I now own, so having all seven images rejected for quality issues was a bit odd. Anyway, the photo below is one of the rejections. Maybe I need to reduce the noise in the sky? I'll try that and re-upload.

Hello!I want to ask how long it takes for Adobe Stock administration to check the AI images I made. I have been waiting 25 days and nobody has reviewed my images.   Best wishes, Electronic Lily Pad   [Moderator moved the thread to the correct forum]

Hi everyone! It is my first time here in Adobe Stock. I uploaded my first image but it was rejected because of its quality and i don't really understand what that mean in this case.  Can anybody explain why? Thanks 

Hi there. I'm a new contributer and have had four images rejected on Quality Issues. Wondering what ppl might think the reason is? I've had eight similar images approved so guess it's not a focus/sharpness issue. Would aporceited any feedback. The attached red image is one that has been rejected. The purple image was approved. Note these are AI generated. Thanks!

In the search for buying images, there is an option for "Copy Space - Images with Copy Space". When submitting my images, how do I ensure that my images appear in this category?Thanks in advence for the help.

Hi, Adobe teamIf i am uploading an image that is similer to any other image on Adobe Stock. may can I use the same Title or Keywords if the image is relevent to that. My image will not be excat same but it will be relevent.in simple may can i copy Title or Keyword of previous image.Best Regards

zuerst einmal, ich achte schon bei jedem Bild auf die Basics, unter anderem darauf dass es scharf ist und dass es kein / wenig Rauschen (bei 200%) gibt. Ich erhalte trotzdem immer wieder Bilder verweigert, bei denen ich nicht weiß warum sie abgelehnt werden.Hier ein Bild eines Hundes, ich achte immer bei Tieren darauf dass sie Augenpartie scharf ist. Hier ist der größte Teil scharf , die Zunge etwas unscharf, der Hintergrund ist rauschfrei bis 200%.Ich wäre nun wirklich erstaunt wenn das Bild wegen der Zunge abgelehnt worden wäre.Ein Bild kann und soll ja nicht von vorne bis hinten scharf sein, manchmal, und, ich kann das auch in vielen angenommen Bildern von anderen Fotographen sehen, ist Unschärfe auch ein valides Stilmittel. Ich kann mir vorstellen dass die Leute sehr viel zu tun haben, und deshalb keine zeit finden können eine Begründung für die Ablehnung zu geben, allerdings wird man häufig mit der nicht begründeten Ablehnung vor den Kopf gestoßen. Ich habe das Bild ange

I have two adobe stock contributor accounts. I have used my Payoneer account to payout. Can I use the same Payoneer account to create a payout from my other adobe stock account? 

I can't access my portfolio and I can't ecen access any post I have, whenever I click the link of post it take me to a page telling me this doesn't exist! how can I access and see my posts? I want to see how does my portfolio looks like for others, can you please help me? this is the link of my portfolio:https://stock.adobe.com/sa/contributor/211241016/MrBadDream 

I read the "quality issues" and "quality standard" copy from Adobe. What is wrong here? 

Hi I am new and I want tips to how to improve my images. Thanks!

Greetings, I had X-number of money in my account and it appears that some has been taken away. I mean in the amount of like 7-8 dollars not the amount that Adobe takes. Can buyers request a refund on any purchases and if so, does the money I made in the said sell get taken from my account to refund the buyer? That'd make sense, just have never had this happen. I'm still sorta a newbie on here! Thanks for any help! Keith J.

This is for Abambo. Reply, maybe I am just to hard on you because I expect something more precise, I've got master degree in fashion photography and if someone is blunt as you guys and so snobbish.     I think this is saying exactly something about you. You just take something out from contest and reply with additional rudeness.  Read it please. https://www.dxomark.com/smartphones-vs-cameras-closing-the-gap-on-image-quality/ Just use Google for research, to find out how it all works, it is all there. This link is from 2020, it is already two years ago, that is a lot for technology.   [Moderator cured the topics. This is not about Contributor critique.]

I think I just got bitten by the AI bug.   All of my last submission was refused. Strangely enough, a portion were refused by Shutterstock because Shutterstock is not accepting AI images due to legal reasons. The images were photos where noise reduction, sharpening and enhancement was performed in post processing with Topaz's Photo AI software. I believe, the Adobe moderator believed them to be AI images.   Any comments or personal expierence?      Here are a few of the photos:

hello people ! i have submitted my photos on adobe 5-6 days ago ... they are in review since then .I want to know ,how much time they will take to get it review or there is something wrong with account ? please answer !!i m waiting

I tried to start to submit photos to Adobe Stock. I started with two excellent and special photos from my motorbike (one made with a drone from top) with some light corrections in Adobe. It´s a Honda and I mentioned the type in the keywords, which is, from my point of view, the right approach since user wants to find their desired content as quickly as possible. The photos were rejected because of copyright issues. I searched in Adobe, and found douzens of photos, showing motorbikes, the name and the logo in the photos and keywords.. so what is this??  I submitted  these photos again without mentioning "Honda", now they claim quality issues...I submitted other photos, one made from a model train facility (size 0) with photo stacking, excellent quality, as experts in this area confirmed to me, and no comparable photos yet in Adobe Photo Stock (and photo stacking NEEDS per se editing in a photo editor). Rejected with quality issues which is ridiculous from my point of view. Sub

Dear Illustrators,I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to you today because I recently received a rejection for an illustration that I created using artificial intelligence. The feedback I received was that the quality of the illustration was poor. I am reaching out to you all to see if anyone could provide me with some guidance on what the issue might be and how to address it.I would greatly appreciate any insight or advice that you can offer. Please see the attached illustration for reference.Thank you for taking the time to read my message, and I look forward to hearing from you soon.Sincerely, Vitaliy Admin's answer:Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review your image. We're sorry, but we can't accept this image into our collection because it doesn't meet our quality standards. 

I'm having trouble accessing my account! It's been 2 days since I sent an email to Adobe and there is no answer at all. After selling my pictures, I got excited to continue uploading more pictures, but I was so sad to get my account blocked. Is anybody having the same problem?

Hello. I will describe a specific situation. I have a question, how in this case I should upwnload releases. So, I have a photo session that is already 10 years old. I took photos and trained the AI, then generated an image of a person based on this training. It is my understanding that, whether or not the image is similar to the original model, I must attach a model release from that 10-year-old photo shoot. Even if it was a young girl, and I got a man with a beard. The second question is should I also attach the property release, since the image doesn't look at all like what the release model refers to? Or is a 10 year old model release enough? I read everything I found on the topic, but this situation with old photographs is still not clear to me. Theoretically, having a model release, I am free to use these photos, among other things, to create new images using AI. What do you say, dear colleagues?

De laatste tijd worden op adobe stock veel fotos geweigerd en ik zie niet echt de reden ervan, omdat ze op shutterstock wel aanvaard worden ! Ik heb een foto als voorbeeld, hebben jullie een idee wat het probleem kan zijn ? De enige melding die ze geven is kwalitetsproblemen. En hoe ik kan voorkomen dat ze geweigerd worden ?

Hi Adobe and everyone,  Recent rejections of my photo and video uploads for "quality issues" seem to be due to Adobe's new algorithms for detecting "blurry" or fuzzy photos.  While the vast majority of low-quality photos fall into this realm, my photos of molecules (mostrly drug and drug target proteins) are represented by sticks/ ribbon reps surrounded by a transparent surface. This is the standard (and beautiful!) way to present molecular structure connectivity (sticks/  ribbons) and volume (surface) in chemistry. The transparent surface may have led the screening AI to think it is blurred. (see attached, first 3 photos of a human cancer protein).   Another way to represent how proteins move is to show different strictures together in one photo, basically like a time-lapse photo. Rightmost is a platypus venom protein moving in water. AI must have thought it to be blurry as well.  Adobe's AI is clearly not versed in chemistry lol. Is there