P: Generated images violate user guidelines

[Hematita]

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

[Bob5E9A]

Again, auto fill can produce weird, bizard stuff. I posted 2 examples a couple of pages back. It has to see it is struggling and probably just pops this message up.

PS is not going to give you a message that says, "our beta is drawing some real crap based on your request and we are too embrassed to use it." No it will not say that, so YOU at fault. You violate community standards by giving us something we messed up on." 🙂

[Graham24508943nobd]

Autofill on the whole has been ok with me. Just wish the bot would learn English though

[MontyWales]

British English, or that American version ?  🙂 

[Graham24508943nobd]

British English, as it widnae understand Scottish  😆😆😆

[Justin3020633906eq]

Hi there,

I'm a big fan of this new feature and most of my requests have been done very well but only one case today, I've been trying to remove a doll in the wooden chair but nothing happen and a notification about "violet user guidelines" show up. Can someone tell me what should I do to make this work?

Sincerely,

Justin

[NCARalph]

But whose triggers and what's in the "etc."? Personally I find Trump and all his MAGA minions extremely upsetting.

If we're going to limit AI to not generate any triggering material we're going to need a public repository of triggers everyone can freely append to, obviously no one would have deletion permissions.

[NCARalph]

For many faiths, depictions of religious figures or even humans of any gender, clothed or not, are forbidden. It shouldn't be very difficult to have the AI scan for human figures and delete the files.

Allowing such images is really the height of  Eurocententrism!

[NCARalph]

Eurocentrism (sp)

[Graham24508943nobd]

I've found by prompting posing, it'll come up with scantily clad people, which you can then clothe

[Richard30145694ygqc]

I've had some success by adding a prompt like "remove doll", rather than giving no prompt. If you haven't tried that yet, I hope it works for you.

[Pete.Green]

Hi all,

The team would like to investigate some of these false flags for guideline violation (not related to a rejected prompt) and would love more info.

This is the error:

What we need:

1. The FULL PSD file
2. The selection you used. See How to save a selection
3. Prompt or unprompted? If prompted, please name your saved selection with the prompt. Otherwise name the selection "unprompted" or "blank"

For those willing, could you please upload the PSD files to the below dropbox?

https://www.dropbox.com/request/wS5onkxYfau7HKtV9EUK

Thank you!

Regards,

Pete

[Audrina30533276h260]

 

I encountered an issue while working on an image in Adobe Photoshop Beta. I utilized the generative fill feature to conceal the cleavage area and hide the bra. Surprisingly, I did not receive any warning while using the fill tool, which worked out great as you can see. However, I am now unable to access the tool, as it indicates a violation of user guidelines when attempting to add bracelets to the wrist area. I am perplexed since I did not intentionally breach any rules or request any improper actions. This situation is frustrating, particularly because it interrupted my ongoing project. Could you assist me in recovering the functionality of the tool?

 

 

[MontyWales]

heres one. I tried changing the girls hand, I used no prompt and got the violation message. i added hand to the prompt and got a monster 🙂 

[Dan The Photo Man]

I frequently get user guideline violation messages.  However, there is no way these violate any guideline.  For instance, right now I am trying fill a gap in between the top of a man's tie and the top of his shirt.  In other words, the knot in his tie is too low and I am trying to fill in that gap by extending his tie up 1/4".  How does this violate a guideline?  These violstion messages happen frequently and is very frustrating.

[Trevor.Dennis]

It seems that Adobe are being cautious with what they are allowing Gen Fill to do, and with the bad press Ai is getting right now, you can hardly blame them.  The bottom line is it what it is, so we have to live with it.  I managed a workaround a few days ago by copying the layer and blurring the 'apparently' offensive area just enough.  Then used Gen Fill and merged the copied layer over the new pixels.  That was a strange situation as I was responding to a post on this forum, and testing a fix on an image they had already produced with Gen Fill (two ladies with swim suits) so I have no idea why it for him but thew up an error for me.

[Jeki968]

In some cases when I use generative feel, I get a message that generative fill has been removed because it violates these User Guidelines, regardless of which text field I leave blank. In one case, it was an ordinary trash can in the park that I wanted to remove.

[CShubert]

Hi @Audrina30533276h260 would it be possible for you to share the .psd file with prompts/layers for the team to look at? If so, send to shubert@adobe.com

[Graham24508943nobd]

I've had the same trying to remove a stupid object the bot gave me instead of a mountain. What makes it so ironic is the fact, they're violating their OWN guidelines😆😅😅

[Bob30552887kq2x]

The background I was trying to extend consisted of a beach (sand and stones) and the ocean, which was to the left of the subjects.  I did not include any of the subjects (or subject parts) in the selected area to extend.  I consistently got the "violated guidelines" alert and the generative fill was deleted.

The process worked when I extended to area below and to the right of the subjects but would not work when trying to extend the image to ghe left.

I was using the latest Beta version of Photoshop (16 June 2023)

[jackm10818096]

Generative Fill will not process images produced by JidJourney or Stable Diffusion. Photoshop beta gives error message "Generated images were removed because they violate our user guidlines"

[Trevor.Dennis]

How big was the image in pixels?

Can you upload the image so we have an idea what you were dealing with?

[reneh83905488]

I tried to remove a twig in the background and got the warning message, that I am violating the policies. It is a picture with a bird in it and lots of branches and twigs in the background. I tried it several times and kept getting that warning message, that the created imaged has been removed, since it violates the policies. 

[Imaginerie]

I just sent you an example by email @Pete.Green 
Hope it helps!

[gina238]

I was removing people from an image I took near Rockefeller Center. The first few passes using AI generated refill removed people perfectly but on 4th area when I hit generate fill to remove last group of people I got this message- "The generated images were removed because they violate user guidelines." The image was taken by me using my Nikon digital camera. The people I was removing were mostly dark blobs so no distinguishing features but it was just a distraction from the view I wanted. Can't imagine I broke any guideline rules but who knows this is all new to me. 

[sebastianr15198647]

Hello team. I work usually on beauty shots and every time I try to extend a led or an arm or even a background the error comes out. Where do I send the example psd file?