P: Generated images violate user guidelines

[Hematita]

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

[daniellei4510]

I didn't suggest that you did. Point is, it's been shown here numerous times that adding a period often (though not necessarily always) fixes the issue. And until the issue is finally resolved, it's worth trying.

[J.C. Scott]

I'll definitely keep it in mind and give it a try next time.

[fanceygirl]

I have been using Photoshop Beta for the last few days with no problems but today I was editing a photo of a wedding. The Bride and her mother was in her bedroom as there was good light from the window however a part of the bed was in the photo and I tried to remove it with the generative fill and it gives me a message saying I am in violation of guidelines. I don't understand. there is no nudity or terrorism or violance..Just a bride and her mother and the part of a bed, which I want to remove.

[PictureArt]

For photographers in the field of portrait and nude photography, the new program is no longer usable, as the guidelines restrict too much. The idea is good, but you can't make art in the areas mentioned anymore!! As a photographer, I depend on working with bare skin.

Sincerely, Steffen Schiller

[RicardoTM05]

I know the guidelines, and I think it would be a good idea to have nudity filter as a preference instead of a violation to the guidelines for the final product.

I know a lot of us work with nudity and it's extremely annoying that we are getting an insane amount of guidelines violation messages when working on those pictures, even if we want to only change things on the background or props in the scene.

I also find amazing to be able to change models outfits, but there are a lot of times we work with transparent clothes (nudity again) and when trying to generate more options it will always throw a violation message, or if it works the transparent parts will be deleted, which is not really helpful.

I think that this software is directed to adults doing professional work and not kids wanting to generate perverted things. While I understand that problematic, I think that the focus should be mainly on the professional side.

So, having nudity as a preference would allow professionals to activate it and have better results and thus a better experience while working, and those who don't need it can keep it deactivated so they don't get any explicit result when working.

[defaultyfp7chz9kt23]

I have to say that beta version 25.0 is a complete mistep in terms of functionality and versatility, so much so that I resorted to using version 24.7 which I believe was the best iteratio . Unfortunately as of today August 14, 2023 generative fill can longer be used with version 24.7. This crusade to arbitrate the moral landscape in creation has become too authoritarian in my honest opinion.

[defaultyfp7chz9kt23]

Also worth noting. the placement of the trashcan on each generative thumbnail is poor. I have already accidently deleted many renderings. Thank goodness for crtl or command Z.

[Meital31671089a8l2]

The generated imeges were removed because they violate user guidelines.
I cant use the ia of photoshop, i work with artistic nudity and it gives me error when i just want to generate a background, I dont know what else to do.

[jane-e]

@Meital31671089a8l2 

Generative fill is in beta, not in the released version. I've moved your post to the Photoshop Beta forum for you.

Jane

[artstuffstl]

Things are a bit prudish, Adobe! I agree with the above!

[RLeintzPhotos]

I keep getting a guideline violation over and over when trying to work on skin retouching? Is this a real violation or a bug? 

[paula45587034]

i decided to look at the option of re-installing Lr and/or Ps Beta since the update of Ps Beta caused all these glitches. 

*i also noticed that Lr's external editor default was set  to Ps 2024 with no option to select Ps Beta.

i opened Adobe CC and saw that neither Adobe Ps nor Ps Beta was listed under the installed apps.

i installed Ps 24.7.0 and everything is now working fine (sending files to/fro Lr) and i now have (at least) the use of the Ai Remove tool.  

i am looking forward to using the generative fill tool sometime soon.

[RLeintzPhotos]

@CShubert @Pete.Green I'm a boudoir photographer, so yeah, the images that I work on are semi-naked women. Is that why I'm getting the flag? I'm making a section of skin (usually just the skin and no other body parts) and typing in "remove wrinkles and marbling" it was working fine for about 2 days, now I seem to get the violation everytime. If I close PS beta and open it again, it will still give me the error but generate one variation. 

[Jumajan]

Large area on left side of photo I am trying to repair. PS won't do it as it "violates user guidelines.

[chi30563797hkql]

I have the same message that popped up when I was editing some family photos. I just uninstalled Ps beta 25

[chi30563797hkql]

I tried to remove a handicap sign and I got the violate message.

[daniellei4510]

Content Aware Fill would work here. Generative Fill, even when released, will never replace the traditional editing tools. 

[3Hounds]

I haven't had any use violations result in quite a while, but now I'm trying to turn a cloth couch into a leather one and GF insists on adding horribly monstrous people or dogs. Just updated this morning

[RLeintzPhotos]

So I tried to go back to  PS Beta  version 24.7 since I wasn't getting that violation as much. But now I can't use Gen Fill at all in the earlier version? It just says "this feature requires the latest updated version" So....what's the deal? 

[Vasyl31723622k0ht]

Hi! I've been trying to use generative fill in different contexts and one of the most useful one is when I use it to remove something from the photo. But somehow it's overly strict in following the guidelines even when they are obviously not violated. For example, if there is an adult clothed woman (!!! but what about professional work in future?) in a photo and I try to generative-fill a small region with a spot, in some images it shows a guideline violation error, but not in other with minimal differences in the subject.

I'm on desktop, Windows 11, Photoshop Beta 25.0.0

[JMDlugosz]

I want to remove a blob using Generative Fill.  I get an error that the generated image is removed because it violates user guidelines!  All I want is a fairly plain shaded background.

[lucidframe]

I tried to give my subject black combat boots using the lasso tool and generative fill. It said my prompt violated guidelines. How? How can I make black combat boots without violating something? It's irritating that it doesn't tell me which words are offensive. I'm assuming it's the word combat. But this is dumb. Sorry, but it is. I understand war is a no no, but combat boots? Really? You guys should let us know which words are offensive so we can tailor our prompts without getting violation strikes. Other than that, I'm loving PS Beta. But seriously, we need to know which words are offensive or all of us will keep inadvertently getting violations. Plus, it's like walking on eggshells. Never in a million years would I suspect combat boots would violate anything. My subject is a goth girl in a dress. I just want her to be wearing combat boots. She's not in a war. She's not in combat...she just needs to be wearing the boots. 

[wilphotos]

Depois de varias atualizações, está cada vez mais chato usar a ferramenta, toda hora quando fazemos uma seleção da um erro dizendo que viola as diretrizes de usuario, quando lancaram a versao estava melhor que hoje , parece que estão piorando envés de corrigir.

[Gixxxa75]

Army boots, big boots and Military boots all seem to work. Agree though the censorship is annoying. 

Bizarre thing is we were trying to generate a mermaid the other day, but everything came out way too sexual for the persons grandchild we were trying to wind up. Hes scarred for life now, believes T Rex's are running around but convinced mermaids dont exist.

[lucidframe]

Thank you, Gixxxa. I just tried black military boot and another violation thingy popped up. Interesting about the mermaid! So overly sexy mermaids are ok for an output, but "fashionable black Goth combat boots" are so offensive that the output very well may people's heads go 'splodey! I wonder what would happen if you tried a T-Rex mermaid? T-Rex top and fish bottom. If their algorithm finds a way to make a T-Rex sexy, then I'm both amused and pissed.