Skip to main content
Participant
May 23, 2023

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

 

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

1084 replies

Kevin Stohlmeyer
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 20, 2023

@Rafael3119322049zr also remember the Generative Fill is still in beta and cannot be used for commerical work, only personal.

Kevin Stohlmeyer
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 20, 2023

@Rafael3119322049zr entering something in the prompt - in this case I used a period "." prevents false flag errors.

Participant
July 19, 2023

@Fabienne22264968m084 

Ich denke das liegt daran dass man nicht deutsch schreiben kann/darf.

Wenn du water statt wasser schreibst wirds wrsnl funktionieren.

Participant
July 19, 2023

Leider gibt mir die KI bei egal welchem Begriff den Hinweis, dass ein Richtlinienverstoß vorliegt. Ich habe es mit allen möglichen Begriffen auf weißer Grundlage getestet. Somit kann keine einzige Richtlinie (z.B. Begriff Wasser) verletzt werden.

Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
July 19, 2023

I got more or less the same when a friend asked me to do a similar pic. I never used weeds though

Inspiring
July 19, 2023

Out of curisoty I made a new selection and put in your prompt exactly as you stated (unmowed grass and "WEEDS" with wildflowers). I got this:

WelbornWorks
Known Participant
July 19, 2023

Some definitions need to be updated I think. When using genterative fill on rural country roadside photo scenes I want to put in unmowed grass and "WEEDS" with wildflowers. It doesn't like weeds. Which even it was thinking "weed" it could just give me the wild grasses we call weeds. If there were a list of usable words we could search or ANY sort of guidelines on text or language that would help and save a ton of time. 

Participating Frequently
July 19, 2023
You are glossing over the obvious fact that the ai must have a list of banned words that can be edited. And probably should be given current results. Something in the programming is making it ban words in the first place. Reporting errors only highlights where the system is failing, it doesn't address the bias in the initial selection.
Participating Frequently
July 19, 2023
On that topic I had a violation for dado rail. I wondered if it thought it was a mis-spelling with a instead of i,  but your experience makes it even more peculiar!
CShubert
Community Manager
Community Manager
July 19, 2023

Hey everyone. Please keep the conversations friendly and on topic. We do hear you all and are working hard to make sure that when Generative Fill is ready for the public it is a solid and fully functioning tool that everyone wants.  

https://community.adobe.com/t5/using-the-community-discussions/adobe-support-community-guidelines/td-p/4788157