P: Generated images violate user guidelines

[Hematita]

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

[alfred531]

Was bitte soll bei diesem Bild gegen die Benutzerrichtlinien verstoßen?

WIN 11

PS Beta/24.7.0

[Kevin Stohlmeyer]

@alfred531 As stated many times in this thread, please try entering a basic prompt for now.

[O. Inha]

Apologies to partake in the derailing of the bug report, but since it's already going there: content filtering isn't just about dodging legal consequences. Any big player in the AI field has a moral obligation to act responsibly with AI like Firefly. Just think about the sheer amount of deep fake we would live amongst if a company like Adobe would lift content filtering. Artistic freedom is one thing, and a priority to Adobe I'm sure, but another, massive thing is creators who don't give a rat's patoot about artistry, and have entirely different motives to use tools like this, that produce realistic imagery while require zero skills and creativity.

[MontyWales]

[information removed as per forum guidelines]

https://community.adobe.com/t5/using-the-community-discussions/adobe-support-community-guidelines/td...

[zevendesign]

Any skilled Photoshop artist can ALREADY accomplish any kind of fake image you can possibly imagine. How is the introduction of a new tool changing this in any significant way? 

[O. Inha]

Any skilled Photoshop artist. Exactly. To sharpen my point: I'm willing to bet that all of world's skilled Photoshop artists combined produce a considerably lower number of seriously ill-intended deep fakes than the troll armies of the dark and grey areas of the interwebs, who would be able to do the same thing, only without any Photoshop skills at all, in literally 5 seconds.

[Graham24508943nobd]

😅😅😅.  

[E250916993jnw]

Fitness photography - Bad

Sports photography - Bad

Beach photography - Especially Bad

What a miracle tool.  But the people who created this really went way overboard in trying to dictate terms of using photoshop for paying customers. I've never actually heard of a restriction of using photoshop prior to this tool. It's always been about free creativity based on the user's imagination. Now you can't even show a wrist or an ankle without getting flagged.  I know this is beta so I suppose perhaps for now this is just the place to be voicing certain opinions on the direction of this otherwise astonishing tool.

I hope when the official version comes out there's an option to identify us as adults. Adult paying customers should not be governered by puritanical guidelines of certain devs. Otherwise the technology will advance and you will just be directing it towards open source.

Furthermore you're marketing photoshop for photographers who have businesses but you're arbitrarily deciding which photography businesses are allowed to use it. There needs to be more thought behind the implications of these guidelines because ultimately people will fall in love with these features, be restricted from using them, and then go look for alternatives elsewhere.

[daniellei4510]

OK...at the risk of spamming the board, since I've already posted this once (although I can't find it and I was on my third glass of wine, so maybe it never got posted), this is a cropped image of a before and after AI image of a woman's chest that was edited entirely with Generative Fill. By making a second, small selection far removed from the main selection, Generative Fill did an excellent job without having to rely on the cloning tool, spot removal tool, remove tool, etc. The issue is a bug and there are work-arounds. Yes, there are words that Adobe has banned, and probably not purposefully. "Tank," for example, which, besides being a military vehicle, also has a variety of NSFW definitions on Urban Dictionary. Things will improve going forward.

[Graham24508943nobd]

did a beach scene yesterday. Result is ok. Still has MAJOR problems generating mountains, even hills and grass. Several times I asked for mountains and got either birds or objects that were not of this earth. Today I prompted for water in a small circle selection and got everything but

[ddv84]

Hi,

i use the PS Beta 24.7.0 on Windows 10 and constantly get the error "The generated images were removed because they violate user guidelines." The images, however, do not violate the community guidelines. They are mostly photographs of a woman wearing a red sommer top and a summer skirt.

What can i do?

I do understand that this feature is still in beta, so im posting here with the intention to help identifiy mistakes.

[Andreas254530901626]

The test of guideline violations is way too sensitive. I found this with numerous astro images like the one of the Moon attached. I simply wanted too remove the writing SINUS IRIDUM, by selecting it with rectangular marquee  tool and applying Generative Fill. This triggered the message that the results were removed because of violating the user guidelines. 
Of course, the old Fill / Context aware did the trick.

[Bob5E9A]

Again, auto fill can produce weird, bizard stuff. I posted 2 examples a couple of pages back. It has to see it is struggling and probably just pops this message up.

PS is not going to give you a message that says, "our beta is drawing some real crap based on your request and we are too embrassed to use it." No it will not say that, so YOU at fault. You violate community standards by giving us something we messed up on." 🙂

[Graham24508943nobd]

Autofill on the whole has been ok with me. Just wish the bot would learn English though

[MontyWales]

British English, or that American version ?  🙂 

[Graham24508943nobd]

British English, as it widnae understand Scottish  😆😆😆

[Justin3020633906eq]

Hi there,

I'm a big fan of this new feature and most of my requests have been done very well but only one case today, I've been trying to remove a doll in the wooden chair but nothing happen and a notification about "violet user guidelines" show up. Can someone tell me what should I do to make this work?

Sincerely,

Justin

[NCARalph]

But whose triggers and what's in the "etc."? Personally I find Trump and all his MAGA minions extremely upsetting.

If we're going to limit AI to not generate any triggering material we're going to need a public repository of triggers everyone can freely append to, obviously no one would have deletion permissions.

[NCARalph]

For many faiths, depictions of religious figures or even humans of any gender, clothed or not, are forbidden. It shouldn't be very difficult to have the AI scan for human figures and delete the files.

Allowing such images is really the height of  Eurocententrism!

[NCARalph]

Eurocentrism (sp)

[Graham24508943nobd]

I've found by prompting posing, it'll come up with scantily clad people, which you can then clothe

[Fishercat]

I've had some success by adding a prompt like "remove doll", rather than giving no prompt. If you haven't tried that yet, I hope it works for you.

[Pete.Green]

Hi all,

The team would like to investigate some of these false flags for guideline violation (not related to a rejected prompt) and would love more info.

This is the error:

What we need:

1. The FULL PSD file
2. The selection you used. See How to save a selection
3. Prompt or unprompted? If prompted, please name your saved selection with the prompt. Otherwise name the selection "unprompted" or "blank"

For those willing, could you please upload the PSD files to the below dropbox?

https://www.dropbox.com/request/wS5onkxYfau7HKtV9EUK

Thank you!

Regards,

Pete

[Audrina30533276h260]

 

I encountered an issue while working on an image in Adobe Photoshop Beta. I utilized the generative fill feature to conceal the cleavage area and hide the bra. Surprisingly, I did not receive any warning while using the fill tool, which worked out great as you can see. However, I am now unable to access the tool, as it indicates a violation of user guidelines when attempting to add bracelets to the wrist area. I am perplexed since I did not intentionally breach any rules or request any improper actions. This situation is frustrating, particularly because it interrupted my ongoing project. Could you assist me in recovering the functionality of the tool?

 

 

[MontyWales]

heres one. I tried changing the girls hand, I used no prompt and got the violation message. i added hand to the prompt and got a monster 🙂