It's not about editing; it's about using.  Also, if you save it as a PNG, you have to scale it WAYYYY up if you're going to potentially do any zooming. ... View more

https://forums.adobe.com/people/Ged+Traynor  wrote The first Gradient is not done in Photoshop, the author is comparing two different Gradients from two different applications. Yes, that's the whole point.  Other applications handle gradients competently, and have done so for decades.  I added another one to the comparison; Affinity Photo is relatively new, and its gradient tool is (like almost everyone else's) actually useful: ... View more

Thanks, dnuff, but that doesn't work as far as I can tell. Correction: That doesn't work with regular markers.  If you've set up a range, clicking on either marker does select the range. But (in addition to the obvious question of why you can't click on the waveform) it's baffling that you can't click anywhere in that timebar area between the markers to select the range.  You have to click exactly on the tiny marker triangles and nowhere else. This is a limited workaround, but it requires you to set up everything as a range instead of simply dividing up your file by dropping markers. Please fix this, Adobe. ... View more

https://forums.adobe.com/people/Meg+The+Dog  wrote Here is a quick and sloppy demo of one way to do it in Premiere by adding a track that carries the reverb only: Very informative!  Thanks for taking the time to do that.  Good info about the submix for this or other purposes. ... View more

MHoecker  wrote I have done this same thing, and the best way I've found to do it within Premiere is still a bit of a process, but gets good results, so here goes Thanks!  While we clearly shouldn't need that rigamarole, it's an interesting workaround. I'll try it. ... View more

https://forums.adobe.com/people/Richard+M+Knight  wrote Have you tried adding reverb in the track mixer? No, because that would add reverb to everything in the track, wouldn't it? The reverb needs to be applied only to the very end of the clip. ... View more

gener7, thanks for the info.  It doesn't apply here, but I appreciate the reply. D, I don't need advice on disk partitioning. It has nothing to do with the fact that Photoshop presented a defective, lazy dialog box that didn't provide essential information.  Rambling on about ancillary aspects of the situation is pointless. And, as it turned out, Photoshop was perfectly capable of launching with the available disk space; apparently it was still suffering from the decades-old malaise of "corrupt preferences file."  That's what emerged after a lengthy exploration of my system by an Adobe rep. ... View more

fhttps://forums.adobe.com/people/Test+Screen+Name  wrote We told you how to get the dialogue to change/set scratch disk. So?  THE DIALOG didn't. Again, no excuse. ... View more

Latest version of Mac OS, latest version of Photoshop as of yesterday. The boot drive had 6 GB free, and the next-fullest drive had over 100 GB. And again, there's no excuse for the dialog not to show what the scratch disks are. ... View more

Really glad they fixed this. GJ, Audition team. Now, PLEASE let us double-click to select between markers somehow!  This is a glaring and significant impediment to using Audition. ... View more

Thanks.  This is the old delete-the-preferences-file "solution" that has been trotted out on Mac programs for 20 (or 30?) years.  Sad that this is still the workaround. In the end, I switched printers and (despite the problem happening on the other printer too earlier), Photoshop did finally start communicating with that printer.  I knew something was different when it badgered me about ColorSync three times in a row for ONE printout; then it did in fact invoke the printing function. When I switched back to the other printer, the paper-size issue had magically disappeared and PS invoked printing on that printer as well.  Therefore I didn't delete my preferences file, because I really don't want to have to go back and fix them all over again. ... View more

Thanks for the reply.  Here's what's happening under Mac OS 10.13.2, latest Photoshop CC 2018. And then if I press Print, nothing happens. The dialog closes, but Photoshop makes no attempt to print. Illustrator and all other apps print fine to the same printer. ... View more

emmrecs  wrote Audition will then play that section and the equivalent length after the marked section and it will remember your choice for each subsequent use of a marked section. Cool. I never even knew about the "skip section" option. And remembering the user-specified range around the selection is good attention to detail, sorely lacking in other CC apps (especially Photoshop). +1 for Audition ... View more

Thanks, Kulpreet! ... View more

Great, hced. I considered making a video too, but figured it was easily reproducible so I didn't take the time. Good job for doing so. By the way, what screen-capture utility did you use? I use QuickTime player, but to add captions I'd need to pull it into an editing app. Just wondering if you have one that lets you add captions conveniently. ... View more

Thanks for the responses, guys. Apparently this used to work: Re: I want to be able to play a selection and then play it again (CS 5.5) Bug report filed. ... View more

Thanks. Unfortunately, there does not appear to be one that resolves this. Does it behave the same way on Windows? ... View more

Thanks Ry! I did submit requests to address all of this. Selection extension could work as is standard on the platform (Shift + arrow, honoring the correct "end" of the selection) while maintaining current functionality. The only change necessary would be to use a different modifier key instead of Shift to manipulate the In and Out points separately. So on the Mac, Ctrl-arrow would move the In point, and Command-Ctrl-arrow to move the Out point. Not sure what the appropriate key would be on Windows (since Ctrl jumps between markers there), but you get the point. I don't think it's possible to address the Shift-based selection extension with keyboard mapping, because of the aforementioned ignorance of the correct "end" of the selection. Also, extending the selection between markers doesn't work on the Mac, so that seems to be a platform-specific problem. Adobe has been great about responding to my feature request, which is refreshing. To me the biggest deal is being able to select a region between markers by double-clicking in the waveform. That is, for me, the single biggest impediment to working in Audition; and could be easily fixed. ... View more

Thanks for the replies, everybody. SteveG(AudioMasters)  wrote You seem to have overlooked the words 'such as'. Nowhere does that statement say that you are required to be able to extend a selection using the shift key - it merely suggests the possibility. First, how did I "seem to overlook" "such as?" That means "for example," so what? The sentence could very well say, "All Microsoft-approved applications must allow keyboard users to make extended selections such as selecting two or more items in a list or highlighting several paragraphs of text."  So there we have the phrase "such as" in a statement of requirement. One has nothing to do with the other. Second, you can cite guidelines, but when I do so they're just vague "possibilities?" That's not the tenor of the documentation at all. They are guidelines, and explicitly state A well-designed keyboard UI allows keyboard users to make extended selections such as selecting two or more items in a list or highlighting several paragraphs of text They go on to provide guidance on a comprehensive set of selection situations. Not exactly "behold the wonderland of possibilities!" And finally: There's absolutely no benefit to defying this convention. It's not as if Adobe has re-used these hotkeys for some innovative new approach; they currently do nothing. Not to mention that this convention is observed elsewhere in Adobe's own applications, so not only is Audition inconsistent with the vast majority of GUI applications on every platform, but with Adobe's own. Incidentally, I'm not condoning this in any way; I'm merely trying to explain why it is, and in fact why Adobe think that there's a good reason for it, although only from their POV, admittedly. Understood, except for the last part: I've yet to see any justification for this missing functionality, let alone a good one. ryclark Using the Shift key with the Left or Right arrow keys moves the In point of the selection to the left or right whilst Shift+Ctrl moves the Out point of the selection on the Waveform view. Thanks, ryclark. But that's still a problem, regardless of whether there is a Mac-specific bug here or not. 1. If your playhead is just sitting there in the waveform with no selection, and you press Shift + right arrow, does it extend a selection to the right? 2. If you set a couple of markers and use Alt-arrow to navigate to one and then Shift-Alt-arrow to navigate to the next, is the range between then selected? 3. If you click and drag from left to right in the waveform to make a selection, and then use Shift-arrow to adjust that selection, does the right end of the selection move? Because that's what you should be adjusting if you dragged from left to right; the right edge is the active end of the selection. If you dragged from right to left, the left edge (In point) should be the active one. Otherwise, how are you supposed to adjust the Out point? You should see similar behavior if you select part of a line of text in your favorite text editor and adjust the selection with the arrow keys. I just tried Word, and it worked as I described. Thanks for the further info about the spectral view. Audition switches to the marquee tool by default when you enable it for some reason, even though only the standard insertion-point tool is shown in the waveform pane. I'll experiment with your method and see how I like it. Unfortunately, the spectrum pane still suffers from the same selection problems as the waveform pane, except for being able to move the selection. Looking at it again, this brings up an obvious question: Why can't you drag the selection in the waveform pane in exactly the same way you can in the spectral one? ... View more

No evidence other than decades of GUI implementations. And you claim to be citing Microsoft guidelines, but the ones you're citing are irrelevant here because they refer to specific functions like printing, which not every application supports. That's what Microsoft is attempting to explain to you. Here's what Microsoft says about extending selections (source: Guidelines for Keyboard User Interface Design (Windows)  ) The initiation point for an extended selection is called the anchor. The final point for the input focus is called the destination. When a user makes an extended selection, such as when highlighting a paragraph of text by holding the SHIFT key and moving the cursor, all of the items between the anchor and the destination will be in the selected state. So Audition is violating guidelines from your own source. Like it or not, those guidelines haven't changed since the '80s and there's absolutely no reason for them to. ... View more

Thanks a lot for the replies, guys. But I disagree that everything is working "correctly." The primary display is the audio waveform; it gets the vast majority of screen real estate, and you can move about and perform editing operations there. If that's not "intended," then this is a grossly misguided UI design that Adobe itself has presented by default. None of the above comments addresses the failure of the selection extension to work. If you can select a range of something in a GUI and move the selection point, the Shift key extends that selection. This isn't an application-specific or even an OS-specific convention; it is and has been a universal standard of every major GUI I'm aware of since the '80s. There is absolutely no benefit to defying it, and doing so is a profound hindrance. I've never heard of anyone editing in a spectral display, but hey, if that works for you, great. But it makes no sense at all to expect users to guess that certain basic selection mechanisms are only available within it. I would bet that a solid majority of users have never even pulled up that display; I've never felt the need to do so. It totally lacks the precision required for the majority of editing I do. One thing I asked about that you can do in the spectrum pane is move the selection region. But again, why on earth would someone guess that he has to pull up the spectral display just to do that? Why not just let us do that in the timebar or the main editing pane, even if it requires a modifier key? The spectral display does offer some very interesting cutting and pasting options for band limiting, but I don't see how working in this pane exclusively could ever be considered faster than working in the waveform display. In addition to the profound lack of precision in identifying where specific sounds begin and end, drawing a selection rectangle and making sure it goes all the way from top to bottom of the pane is far, far fussier than clicking and dragging in the waveform editor (as just one example). Therefore I submit that using the spectral display as your main editing window is not intended. Also it is not necessary to use markers for selecting the audio, unless you wish to come back to that exact selection in the future. Which is exactly what I want to do, and which I do a lot. As I asked above, isn't this a major reason for setting up ranges in the first place? If you click on either of the grey handles on the marked selection (or in the item in the Markers window) it will select the range. Thanks for that info. That is just terrible UI, and inexplicable. And finally: I discovered that Mix Paste will indeed allow one to limit the pasting to the selection. Just set the existing-audio level to zero, and select "overwrite" under Paste Type. So all good on that one. I also notice that Audition offers a "paste to new" option in the Edit menu, which Adobe has huffily refused to add to Photoshop despite years of complaints. Go figure. ... View more

This defect still hasn't been fixed. Approaching the end of 2017 here. Clients regularly provide me with logos as EPS, which is exactly what they should be using. Premiere doesn't handle vector images in Adobe's own format? There was no excuse for this in the first place. Embarrassing. File a bug report on this, people: Feature Request/Bug Report Form ... View more

All good. I just wanted an answer to that one main question. I did file a feature request about it. I hope the dev team understands the importance of being able to see all of our project's assets in one place. ... View more