Adobe Collaboration Experiences

There are three versions of Lightroom - four if one includes the phone app. They are all called Lightroom.Both Lightroom and Lightroom Classic are described as desktop versions.Lightroom web is not called that; it is also called Lightroom. Not unique or descriptive. CLASSIC is a desktop version.CC? Hybrid? If it is an application one downloads, but which makes one's images available on any device one has access to, it should have a different, DISTINCTIVE name like, Lightroom Collaborate or Lightroom Spectrum, or something that will differentiate it appropriately. Just calling it Lightroom... Why? Lightroom web should not exist. It is garbage, and there are sync issues that need a tech to fix. Adobe needs to have a good look at the inconsistencies in their descriptionsI.e. In the Adobe Creative Cloud Application, in Apps (left side menu), Lightroom (available in your plan) doesn't have a descriptive name. If that is the hybrid that one can access from a desktop, or t

Boa tarde,Na modalidade NAMED, nós conseguimos gerenciar cada licença por e-mail, bem como cancela-la a qualquer tempo. Precisamos que no SDL, tenhamos mecanismos de cancelar instalações irregulares por meio do seu perfil e pacote definido.

Our need with the adobe admin console is: We need a function  for e-mail notifcations if alle adobe cc / dc licenses are assigned (no unassigned licenses in the adobe admin console left) to our users.  We can imagine that others could benefit from this function aswell! 

There needs to be an easier way to save/manage photos on the Adobe Stock site. Allow us to select a "default library". This would be helpful instead of having to select the library every time while we are saving. Right now you have to select the library a couple of times for it to finally start automatically saving to a specific library. A search feature for the library name after we heart an image and click "manage" to quickly change the library location. This way we don't have to scroll to find the name every time.A zoom feature so we can see the details of photos better. I have downloaded many photos that I couldn't tell were bad quality.An easier way to organize photos in libraries on the desktop website - add filters for libraries (sort by recently added to older, asset type, asset status, text search box to find a specific photo in that library)I think Shutterstock has a great UI that should be used on Adobe stock. They make it so easy to manage photos.

I like the idea of CC Libraries. For me, there was a bit of cognitive dissonance at first because I thought I could put assets in the CC Files. This would have been the most convenient way to add assets to my projects. I deal with hundreds, sometimes thousands of assets daily. I opened the Creative Cloud app and noticed I could manage Libraries there. I could create a "Custom group" and then a "subgroup" to organize my assets. This was greatly appreciated, although one observation. This UI is behaving a lot like directories on a desktop computer, without the nicities of directories. In each subgroup I have thousands of assets stored. Their names are suboptimal because most are generated with a script, but I could easily find an asset if I could sort a subgroup by created / modified date instead of the default alphanumeric. This feature is sadly missing. In the MacOS CC App, I cannot collapse subgroups or select subgroups from the breadcrumb menu. This prevents me from quickly

Enable an option for permissions to be changed from CAN VIEW to CAN EDIT, specifically for business storage when using "everyone" folders. Currently, there is only a way to set a VIEW or EDIT setting when first creating the library, but not after the library is created. This is specific to the "everyone" listing and not shares to individual users.

I noticed how much screenspace in the CC Library UI is filled with stuff I rarely use or only serves a 'set up once'-function. Currently it's like this:- Panel name- Library name- Search bar- taskbar with filter options- Finally we arrive at the actual content, which has very large group headers that take up even more space. I think it would be much better to have a cleaner layout that allows you to collapse or hide elements of the UI that you don't need (similar to how the links panel in ID can be customised). 5 cm's of the top of the panel is currently filled with ui. Would love to have a compact file browser at the bottom of the screen, but that's impossible with the amount of UI elements at the top.  

It's pretty annoying when I am constantly kicked out of Acrobat Pro (which my work pays for) when I open up Lightroom or Photoshop (which I pay for). I even canceled my personal email plan and set up a "profile" because an Adobe employee told me it won't kick me out. Guess what? Profiles does it too.I would like to be able to stay SIGNED IN ON A BUSINESS APP while also being SIGNED IN ON A PERSONAL APP on the SAME COMPUTER. This has been requested over 1,000 times (seriously search the forums) going back 6 years! Adobe is the only company making this difficult...

Great idea that saves you time when sending out for review, but I would love to see on this tool the followng:1. Be able to rotate pages2. Be able to copy and paste text when you receive a review in the apps3. Be able to send out specific pages from all the apps, now it is only available in illustrator4. Be able when paste the link in the email to have description and preview of the image like in Dropbox5. Be able to send high res files for SHARE TO PRINT.

when it's time to populate a lib we have to select one color a a time and add it, why not give a choice to add all colors selected   

When replacing an asset in Illustrator with an asset from the CC Library, the search field is greyed out, and it is impossible to search for an asset. 

A review often means proofreading a layout with text blocks arranged upside-down. The inability to rotate the preview renders this whole "shared for review" feature useless.