About pixxxelschubser - Adobe Community

Exit

pixxxelschubser

Community Expert

pixxxel schubser

active since 2009 | 6100+ posts

pixxxelschubser

Community Expert

pixxxel schubser

active since 2009 | 6100+ posts

Activity

Hi @karolina_3345 Unfortunately, I can't read the message in your screenshot. However, a very probable cause under Windows could be the use of Opera as a browser. Please try another browser and let us know what happens.

Direct hit @Jeff Arola Yes, this is activated for me. 😉

Hmmh? Not for me (with 26.1.0) - see also my previous screenshot “Clear Layer Style” is still there when I try to delete an existing style. But I usually drag the effects to the trash can.

Strange. I'm on Windows with PS 26.1.0

5-6 days ago there was a problem and the generation did not work well. Apparently the problem has been fixed (at least for me the generation works again since then).

Which Illustrator version are you using? In one of the previous versions, there was a bug that created unclean contours as soon as the contour thickness became smaller than 0.05 mm. Perhaps this also applies to the offset path? I have not yet experienced such an error in more recent versions (nor have I heard of it).

Unfortunately, the 3D features are no longer available in the new PS versions. Sorry Here is the official Adobe statement on this topic: https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/kb/3d-faq.html

duplicate post --> https://community.adobe.com/t5/illustrator-discussions/my-layers-button-disapeared/td-p/15020188 *Locked*

Press [F7] or menu: Windows --> Layers

Hi Ares, Without Alt, the transformation is only repeated for the same object (but no copy is created). This behavior has been the same for years. What other setting do you have?

You can also make a selection and copy the selection into a new layer with Ctrl+j Then transform with Ctrl+T (and confirm). Then Shift+Alt+Ctrl+T The result is the same.

Exactly. Make a transformation. Undo it! Apply "Transform again with last values + copy" 😉

Hi @MahaB82A I always use a slightly different workflow. Instead of Ctrl+J -> activate the layer with the square Ctrl+T with your settings Ctrl+Z Shift+Alt+Ctrl+T (as often as necessary) This creates a copy of the layer and at the same time applies the last transformation values used.

Photoshop Ecosystem is not the appropriate forum for invoice questions. You will probably have to go via the chat. You may find similar questions or advice in this Adobe community: https://community.adobe.com/t5/account-payment-plan/ct-p/ct-account-payment-and-plan?page=1&sort=latest_replies&filter=all&lang=all&tabid=discussions Note : Please do not respond to anyone that contacts you via this forum's Private Message system and asks for account details. Scammers are known to do that posing as employees.

As has already been said, it is not possible. However, if a smart object is also out of the question for you, there may still be a workaround. However, only if the boundary between the two original shapes forms a straight line. Assign a gradient to the combined shape as a "hard gradient" (both colors at the same position)

Hallo @Iwan24905747x70q danke für den Screenshot. Dein Ebenenaufbau erschließt sich mir nicht ganz. Du verwendest ein Smartobjekt mit Ebenenmaske als Schnittmaske für das (gleiche oder ein ähnliches) Smartobjekt? Warum? Könnte eventuell dieses Konstrukt für die Fehlermeldung verantwortlich sein?

On Windows, you can set the view in the folder options. This should work in a similar way on the Mac.

You can draw in the mask. Or you can use a selection in the mask and fill it with black. Or you can group your smart object and assign a layer mask to the group and blur the edge there, or or or or ... If that works for you have fun 😉

It will probably be much more difficult to implement such a design with Illustrator. That's why I personally would favor Photoshop. (There are other alternative drawing programs from Adobe, but these were not initially in demand). A graphics tablet and the use of various brushes is probably a good start.

Hi @Stephen Marsh We agree on that. 😉 That's exactly what I wrote: … They definitely don't want a file with 4 × 32 bit/channel (that would be 128 bit colour depth) … By @pixxxelschubser

I am pretty sure that your print shop wants a CMYK file with 32 bit colour depth. They definitely don't want a file with 4 × 32 bit/channel (that would be 128 bit colour depth) Save the file with 8 bit/channel (= 32 bit colour depth) and send it to your print shop. Best regards

Photoshop Ecosystem is not the appropriate forum for invoice questions. You will probably have to go via the chat. You may find similar questions or advice in this Adobe community: https://community.adobe.com/t5/account-payment-plan/ct-p/ct-account-payment-and-plan?page=1&sort=latest_replies&filter=all&lang=all&tabid=discussions Note : Please do not respond to anyone that contacts you via this forum's Private Message system and asks for account details. Scammers are known to do that posing as employees.

Es ist sehr schwierig, eine konkrete Aussage zu treffen. Andere Bewegungen mit dem Werkzeug, andere Bereiche "überfahren", andere Reihenfolge der Bewegungen mit dem Werkzeug, andere Werkzeuggröße - alles kann durchaus zu komplett unterschiedlichen Ergebnissen führen. In deinem eingangs gezeigtem Bild gibt noch eine zusätzliche Schwierigkeit. An mehreren Stellen hat der Himmel bereits eine ähnliche "geisterhafte" Tönung, z.B. über dem Heck oder auch rechts über dem Gebäude. Aber auch links von dem zu entfernenden Turm ist eine solche "Verfärbung" vorhanden. Möglicherweise wird diese durch das Entfernen-Tool berücksichtigt und mit eingebaut.

Hier?

Danke für die Beispielbilder. Siehst du hier auch einen solchen Ghost-Schatten?

Hallo @vwmatze Kannst du bitte noch das Ausgangsbild zum Vergleich zeigen?

Good that you have found the solution. However, you should still optimise the colour a little. Because the values do not yet correspond to the colour you posted at the beginning.

The colour sampler with two measuring points helps you to find the best values for the black and white adjustment layer (base maximum black).

Try a similar wording.

You can also use a gradient map.