Feature Requests

I am constantly getting copyright violation notices from YouTube for music I've licensed from Adobe Stock. This requires me to file a dispute with the copyright holder via YouTube. To do this, I have to find the music I used in the video and then find the license number on the Adobe Stock website. To get the license number on the Adobe Stock site seems to require several steps:1) Find the name of the music track - which may no longer be an exact match to the name of the track reported by the copyright holder.2) Use the Adobe stock Search feature to find the track on the Adobe Stock website.3) Copy the track's ID from the search results.4) Copy the track's ID.5) Click on your account icon (top-right corner of the website).6) Click on License History.7) In the results page, copy the asset ID into the Search bar and click the search button.😎 Click the "Info" button next to asset's license type (Standard or Extended).9) Copy the license number. That's NINE operations, jus

Just wanted to create a post to highlight some things that really hinder my Premiere Pro experience, in the hope that others agree and changes can be made:The Graphics Templates rely too heavily on thumbnail to understand what they're actually offering. About 75% of the time I purchase a template, it doesn't have all the features I need. For example some have limited font options, or limited options to control timings etc. By the time you realise this, it's too late and you have paid. The model feels - to me - like a revenue trick. There isn't a straightforward way to cancel the purchase that didn't meet expectations, unlike items you would purchase in a shop or supermarket (which I believe is a customer Right in many jurisdictions).Secondly, almost all templates are in HD and not 4K. This is very outdated, particularly for a paid service. Scaling down beats scaling up.I'd love to see these improvements made.

Hello! Here's an extension of something I posted as a suggest/feature request for the Adobe Creative Cloud Desktop app, but applies equally well to the Stock service and Bridge too. URL of original post: https://community.adobe.com/t5/creative-cloud-desktop-ideas/allow-sorting-and-filtering-library-assets-by-licensed-unlicensed-or-non-stock/idi-p/15219236#M2600 Copy and paste content of original post: Hello! I would love, love, LOVE to be able to filter and sort files in my Adobe libraries by what kind of license they have: Licensed (from Adobe Stock), Unlicensed (also from Adobe Stock), or Non-Stock (anything else). We can already do this in the Stock site's library, but not in the CC Desktop App library, or the CC online equivalent library, or in Bridge. But sadly the Stock site doesn't let us move licensed images from one library or group to another - at least, not easily enough that I'd have found it within the last few years. In other words, I would love t

Hey,Right now there seems to be only 1 option for download which sometimes is a huge file. Could we get some options to download additional (smaller) file sizes? Thank you

Can we please get location tagging on individual photos? If a photographer is geotagging their photos already, please allow that location to appear in the search. Or, allow a contributor to add the location data.   Since the search functionality in Stock is less than stellar, at least a location tag would help. When searching for a specific place, it can currently take hours and then I often have to fact-check the location using external tools to verify accuracy. This process takes so much extra time for people who are licensing the photos. For example, when looking for photos of Mexico City the search returned all sorts of results that were not actually Mexico City. Having to verify search results using web browser tools is not a good user experience 

as mentioned in the subject line. An extra filter for vectors with editable stroke saves a lot of time and unnecessary purchases. A clearer filter function would be desirable anyway, as images/vectors are now always... are displayed that have nothing to do with the search term. So maybe a field: exclude images... or something similar. An AI search plugin that recognizes the content shown and then assigns it correctly would certainly be helpful here, so that you don't always have to rely solely on the keywords used by the creators, making a quick search obsolete. PS: when I entered the title, no corresponding post came up..if there is one here: sorry.

Bonjour.Etant un client d'Adobe Stock, il m'arrive souvent de tomber sur des images proposées dans les résultats de recherche dont la qualité n'est pas du tout au rendez-vous. Aujourd'hui, mis à part le forum, il n'est pas possible pour un client de les signaler.Exemple sur cette photo :                                            N° de fichier :  304635841                                       Il faudrait avoir une solution plus simple pour les clients de pouvoir signaler une mauvaise qualité des fichiers proposés, depuis le panneau ''Report Issue'' par exemple qui ne permet que de signaler un abus de droits d'auteur ou de copyright à l'heure actuelle.S'il y a une autre méthode ce signaler ce genre d'image de mauvaise qualité évidente, faite-le moi savoir.Cordialem

Can we please get an option to block contributor accounts? I'm seeing a lot of Gen AI content that is not labeled and it's frustrating. I don't want to waste my time sifting through their spam content and would like too simply block their account entirely.  We also need a flagging option for unmarked Gen AI, please. Since I have to keep choosing the option to exclude Gen AI, which needs to be a default option, when Gen AI still shows up, it's wasting my time, and I have deadlines to make.  

Hello! I've been experiencing a frustrating issue with my stock library, where I have saved over 1,000 assets. When I open the library, assets load continuously on a single page as I scroll down. However, this causes my browser to freeze every time, preventing me from reaching the bottom of the page. It would be extremely helpful if the library were paginated, similar to how search results for new assets are displayed or how other stock libraries manage large collections. This is NOT a processor, browser, or RAM issue—other pages and websites work perfectly fine. Additionally, I am unable to delete assets because the page becomes so slow that it either lags severely or crashes entirely. Please address this issue as soon as possible. I would greatly appreciate any improvements to make the library more functional. Thank you!

Hello,I kindly request you to add a watermark on the thumbnails of SVG files. It is very easy for people to take screenshots and use them without permission. Thank you.

Dear Adobe Devs,I've never uploaded photos to the stock site but need to use it often for developing educational materials. Trying to search this site has brought me near tears of frustration many times. Here's a list of things that would make a user's life better and we would be more inclined to use this site instead of competitors.   Add search defaults. My company doesn't allow generative AI, I can't use Premium with our licensing agreement, and can't use Editorial-only images. Please be mindful of your customers' time and allow default search options. Allow short phrases or multiple words for a description. Boolean searches have not worked well and searches can be painful when I get 200 pages of unrelated images to sift through. Add locations for the images, both name and location coordinates. If I'm searching for Manchester, New Hampshire, it's confusing and can lead to inaccuracies if the search includes Manchester, England. Or if there's no location at a

Hey Adobe -- Maybe use your AI superpowers to write longer image descriptions that could be used for alt tags, and display the descriptions on the photo's detail page. The mini description/title isn't enough in many cases.

Has anyone in this community thought about pushing Adobe to provide a natural-language search function on Stock? I'm asking as a designer who uses Stock, and would love not to have to fiddle around with awkward keyword searches that often end up taking hours to find a few images.   Generative AI doesn't have the quality yet, so I'm not going to waste time with text-to-image, but if I could describe what I'm looking for in the same way someone might write a prompt, and a Sensei-powered algorithm could surface the non-AI images or illustrations that fit... boy, would that save time! Why can't I search for "A quiet Mediterranean beach at sunset with sailboats anchored offshore."?     The technology is already out there. A NLP front-end to Adobe Stock, as distinct from text-to-image generative AI (that, honestly, mostly wastes time), would save designers a boatload of time and has the potential to free contributors from the tyranny of keywords.

We prefer to use images of models NOT looking at the camera, especially the classic yet boring stock image of someone crossing their arms and looking at the camera. How do I filter out these types of images?  If it is not possible, please consider adding this to the filtering preferences. Thank you. 

I would love to be able to filter by number of people in an image; one, two, or group. This would help significantly when looking for a portrait or a more active group image. I would also like to be able to exclude things with Boolean terms. For example, I rarely use beach images but they come up a lot in my searches. I would love to be able to add "NO beach" or "NOT beach" and have that filter out those images in my search.

I need a better way to organize my library "boards" in Adobe Stock. There's no way to bulk move images from one library to another and everything I purchase lands in the last library I used which is not necessarily the correct library. iStock and Shutter stock do a better job with organizing and managing image libraries.

For the daily use of Stock, especially with a bigger team, it would be very valuable to have a filter within the search for the already licensed/downloaded pictures/videos etc. So that you could still use every filter and the normal search. With this feature, Stocks could act as an easy image database.  The license-view is not useable for this as the pictures are way too small, you need to hover over those to see it accordingly, and you have only 10 pictures per side. Also, the marking of already licensed pictures is really hard to identify and could be optimized. 

Hello!My idea is that the files can be configured for a certain type of action, such as that you can print the number of times that the author wants, that way you put an end to indiscriminate copying and piracy.Everyone who obtains a license will take care of their file to be able to print with their license until the file has no more number of prints.I send you a kind greeting, thank you very much! [Link removed by moderator]

Could a search option be available for the individual's My library assets?  Yes, I could create many categories, but it could be valuable to search assets selected for use later.It saves time, especially if the My Library category has many assets.

It would be great to have a regional or geographical filter.  Cars, trucks, the lane they drive in, etc. are different in the US, Mexico and Canada for instance than in England, Europe, Australia, African Nations....It would be great to add a field for the contributors to share the geographical region the photo was taken in, or the illustration or vector is model for.

It would be great to have a regional or geographical filter.  Cars, trucks, the lane they drive in, etc. are different in the US, Mexico and Canada for instance than in England, Europe, Australia, African Nations....It would be great to add a field for the contributors to share the geographical region the photo was taken in, or the illustration or vector is model for.  

I would like to have the option of offering project packages. I've seen this on other websites like envato, and I would like to provide similar options for Illustrator, InDesign, After Effects, and Premiere Pro project packages. These packages would consist of the original source materials, possibly including masked-out source files or replacement reference images—that can be replaced and used for future updates. Having a single file, such as an Illustrator file with all images embedded and assets pre-built, can make it very confusing to relink and update the images. The same applies to InDesign, After Effects, and Premiere Pro. I need to be able to zip package my project and provide the zipped project file to my clients. Unfortunately, I cannot currently do this on Adobe Stock, but I would like to start selling my premaed projects there once this functionality is available.

There are several intances of clearly generative Ai images on Adobe Stock that are not labeled as Ai. Is there a way to report these images? For example: FILE #: 623577639 from user Artofinnovation is clearly and Ai image but not labeled. In fact, all of this particular user's images are clearly ai images but many are missing the Ai label. Just looking through the 1st page of their portfolio I found no less than 10 Ai images that are missing the label:FILE #: 607885007FILE #: 623578485FILE #: 619605798FILE #: 623577640FILE #: 612087689FILE #: 610057244FILE #: 619604437FILE #: 583095681FILE #: 572620297FILE #: 605499016 Users need a way to report this while browsing and so far I have found no means to do this besides posting to the community. I am coming across this far too often. I want to avoid Ai images at all costs and filtering the search results to exclude generative Ai should not mean I still run into this many Ai images.    

Would be great to have a rollover popup that says the name of the file, etc... so we don't have to click and open that image. Just hover and we can see what the title of the image is. Would save a lot of time...  

I've seen several other posts in other threads saying this but I just wanted to add my voice to the chorus and say that as a user of stock photography I'm sick of AI-generated images showing up in my searches even when I've selected to exclude them in the filters. There are certain users who keep showing up in my searches as doing this (when you go on their libraries it's wall-to-wall AI stuff, so I have to imagine it's an intentional thing).  From what I've read this isn't against the rules currently but I just wanted to say I think it should be, and I'd like to be able to report or flag these posts. I know I can't do much as an artist against the tide of AI art but the least we can do is keep it separated from the more thoughtfully created stuff. Thanks!