Feature Requests

Hello! I've been experiencing a frustrating issue with my stock library, where I have saved over 1,000 assets. When I open the library, assets load continuously on a single page as I scroll down. However, this causes my browser to freeze every time, preventing me from reaching the bottom of the page. It would be extremely helpful if the library were paginated, similar to how search results for new assets are displayed or how other stock libraries manage large collections. This is NOT a processor, browser, or RAM issue—other pages and websites work perfectly fine. Additionally, I am unable to delete assets because the page becomes so slow that it either lags severely or crashes entirely. Please address this issue as soon as possible. I would greatly appreciate any improvements to make the library more functional. Thank you!

Hello,I kindly request you to add a watermark on the thumbnails of SVG files. It is very easy for people to take screenshots and use them without permission. Thank you.

Dear Adobe Devs,I've never uploaded photos to the stock site but need to use it often for developing educational materials. Trying to search this site has brought me near tears of frustration many times. Here's a list of things that would make a user's life better and we would be more inclined to use this site instead of competitors.   Add search defaults. My company doesn't allow generative AI, I can't use Premium with our licensing agreement, and can't use Editorial-only images. Please be mindful of your customers' time and allow default search options. Allow short phrases or multiple words for a description. Boolean searches have not worked well and searches can be painful when I get 200 pages of unrelated images to sift through. Add locations for the images, both name and location coordinates. If I'm searching for Manchester, New Hampshire, it's confusing and can lead to inaccuracies if the search includes Manchester, England. Or if there's no location at a

Hey Adobe -- Maybe use your AI superpowers to write longer image descriptions that could be used for alt tags, and display the descriptions on the photo's detail page. The mini description/title isn't enough in many cases.

Has anyone in this community thought about pushing Adobe to provide a natural-language search function on Stock? I'm asking as a designer who uses Stock, and would love not to have to fiddle around with awkward keyword searches that often end up taking hours to find a few images.   Generative AI doesn't have the quality yet, so I'm not going to waste time with text-to-image, but if I could describe what I'm looking for in the same way someone might write a prompt, and a Sensei-powered algorithm could surface the non-AI images or illustrations that fit... boy, would that save time! Why can't I search for "A quiet Mediterranean beach at sunset with sailboats anchored offshore."?     The technology is already out there. A NLP front-end to Adobe Stock, as distinct from text-to-image generative AI (that, honestly, mostly wastes time), would save designers a boatload of time and has the potential to free contributors from the tyranny of keywords.

We prefer to use images of models NOT looking at the camera, especially the classic yet boring stock image of someone crossing their arms and looking at the camera. How do I filter out these types of images?  If it is not possible, please consider adding this to the filtering preferences. Thank you. 

I would love to be able to filter by number of people in an image; one, two, or group. This would help significantly when looking for a portrait or a more active group image. I would also like to be able to exclude things with Boolean terms. For example, I rarely use beach images but they come up a lot in my searches. I would love to be able to add "NO beach" or "NOT beach" and have that filter out those images in my search.

I need a better way to organize my library "boards" in Adobe Stock. There's no way to bulk move images from one library to another and everything I purchase lands in the last library I used which is not necessarily the correct library. iStock and Shutter stock do a better job with organizing and managing image libraries.

For the daily use of Stock, especially with a bigger team, it would be very valuable to have a filter within the search for the already licensed/downloaded pictures/videos etc. So that you could still use every filter and the normal search. With this feature, Stocks could act as an easy image database.  The license-view is not useable for this as the pictures are way too small, you need to hover over those to see it accordingly, and you have only 10 pictures per side. Also, the marking of already licensed pictures is really hard to identify and could be optimized. 

Hello!My idea is that the files can be configured for a certain type of action, such as that you can print the number of times that the author wants, that way you put an end to indiscriminate copying and piracy.Everyone who obtains a license will take care of their file to be able to print with their license until the file has no more number of prints.I send you a kind greeting, thank you very much! [Link removed by moderator]

Could a search option be available for the individual's My library assets?  Yes, I could create many categories, but it could be valuable to search assets selected for use later.It saves time, especially if the My Library category has many assets.

It would be great to have a regional or geographical filter.  Cars, trucks, the lane they drive in, etc. are different in the US, Mexico and Canada for instance than in England, Europe, Australia, African Nations....It would be great to add a field for the contributors to share the geographical region the photo was taken in, or the illustration or vector is model for.

It would be great to have a regional or geographical filter.  Cars, trucks, the lane they drive in, etc. are different in the US, Mexico and Canada for instance than in England, Europe, Australia, African Nations....It would be great to add a field for the contributors to share the geographical region the photo was taken in, or the illustration or vector is model for.  

I would like to have the option of offering project packages. I've seen this on other websites like envato, and I would like to provide similar options for Illustrator, InDesign, After Effects, and Premiere Pro project packages. These packages would consist of the original source materials, possibly including masked-out source files or replacement reference images—that can be replaced and used for future updates. Having a single file, such as an Illustrator file with all images embedded and assets pre-built, can make it very confusing to relink and update the images. The same applies to InDesign, After Effects, and Premiere Pro. I need to be able to zip package my project and provide the zipped project file to my clients. Unfortunately, I cannot currently do this on Adobe Stock, but I would like to start selling my premaed projects there once this functionality is available.

There are several intances of clearly generative Ai images on Adobe Stock that are not labeled as Ai. Is there a way to report these images? For example: FILE #: 623577639 from user Artofinnovation is clearly and Ai image but not labeled. In fact, all of this particular user's images are clearly ai images but many are missing the Ai label. Just looking through the 1st page of their portfolio I found no less than 10 Ai images that are missing the label:FILE #: 607885007FILE #: 623578485FILE #: 619605798FILE #: 623577640FILE #: 612087689FILE #: 610057244FILE #: 619604437FILE #: 583095681FILE #: 572620297FILE #: 605499016 Users need a way to report this while browsing and so far I have found no means to do this besides posting to the community. I am coming across this far too often. I want to avoid Ai images at all costs and filtering the search results to exclude generative Ai should not mean I still run into this many Ai images.    

Would be great to have a rollover popup that says the name of the file, etc... so we don't have to click and open that image. Just hover and we can see what the title of the image is. Would save a lot of time...  

I've seen several other posts in other threads saying this but I just wanted to add my voice to the chorus and say that as a user of stock photography I'm sick of AI-generated images showing up in my searches even when I've selected to exclude them in the filters. There are certain users who keep showing up in my searches as doing this (when you go on their libraries it's wall-to-wall AI stuff, so I have to imagine it's an intentional thing).  From what I've read this isn't against the rules currently but I just wanted to say I think it should be, and I'd like to be able to report or flag these posts. I know I can't do much as an artist against the tide of AI art but the least we can do is keep it separated from the more thoughtfully created stuff. Thanks!

User has uploaded Video Copilot Action Essentials assets, user is not Andrew Kramer. https://stock.adobe.com/au/video/sand-falling-slowly-and-continuously-from-the-top-over-a-black-background-shot-at-60fps-from-the-sahara-collection-dust-vfx-video-element-more-elements-in-our-portfolio/550515042 Adobe is the worst. I hope Andrew Kramer/VCP sue you for profiting off their stolen content.  No report button means they do not care about fake/stolen assets, only profits. Adobe is the worst. 

So much AI crap uploaded with no AI tag, give us a simple way to report/flag these. https://stock.adobe.com/au/video/the-ground-erupts-in-a-violent-explosion-sending-plumes-of-dirt-and-debris-high-into-the-air/683131768https://stock.adobe.com/au/video/a-car-exploding-on-impact-engulfing-the-surrounding-area-in-a-dangerous-inferno/678974100https://stock.adobe.com/au/video/an-intense-blast-rips-through-an-oil-refinery-causing-a-chain-reaction-of-fiery-explosions-and-billowing-smoke/678974688  My work has a licence deal with Adobe for unlimited stock, but we are no longer using Adobe Stock due to all the AI generated crap. "Stock footage" is footage that has been filmed not generated. Having AI generated content on a "stock footage" website is stupid. They are 2 completly different things, and no one wants to use AI generated crap when they are looking for stock footage.

I have an corperate account. All the assets that are already licensed by my colleagues will be marked as "Licensed" when they appear in my search results as well.As a result, I wanna search for assets that has already been licensed by my colleagues, before venturing out for new assets and license them.Is there a way to do that in Stock asset search page? I know I can go through the licensed history and search there. But, there I could only see a thumbnail of the asset which is tiny! And I don't know why Adobe Stock does not provide a 'grid view' or sth. Anyway the licensed history is pretty much useless when it comes to looking for assets visually.

Adobe, why are you spending so much energy on integrating/improving AI in your products, while your horrendous & frustrating stock image search is completely ignored??? And while youre at it, revamp your abysmal Adobe Fonts site. How is a design company so unaware of it's own terribly designed products? Do better. Fix the garbage that goes ignored for years.

I am very surprised that these simple basic features are not available in Adobe Stock. It is very incovenience to user and difficult to navigate. I also spent a lot of time in order to understand the t&c of the subscription. Please make it obvious and indicate that it is saved and can unsave to library. It would be good if can select which library to save also. It's funny that I have to do manual calculation by checking back license history to know how much is my plan's balance instead get a glance by hovering over profile just like generative credit.

helloAfter I went on a photography trip workers installing solar panels it's very difficult and hard very hot work. I was surprised that on other agency this group of images sold really well. But it couldn't be sold on the Adobe website. When I looked into the buyer page, I found that This group of images is occupied by a large number of AI images.I would like to call on Adobe to support real photography quality works. that builds with manual skills and physical strength as well as true human potential by "setting image search to exclude AI images as default"Please consider this request as well. For the survival of society, high quality photography work Thanks, Best regard.

When you download AI images from Adobe Stock, they aren't saved with "Create PDF Compatible File" checked. That means the thumbnail image in Finder is the AI Icon, requiring users to open files to see what they are. Makes it hard to organize files. 

As a pickleball player and president of a large pickleball club, I have searched Adobe Stock for pickleball images for flyers and the club website. The selection I have found is atrocious. Particularly bad when you consider how many millions of pickleball players there are in the US and how fast this sport is growing. For one thing, all the balls shown are indoor balls, which have fewer and larger holes then the outdoor version, which is in far greater use. There are literally no outdoor walls picture that I could find. The other problem I had was that the AI generated content for both balls and paddles was often erroneous. It showed people playing with all manner of strange rackets as well as balls that appear to be alien in origin. Adobe can do better! I submitted this input through a chat agent and had to fight like hell just to get and to agree to pass the input along off the food chain. Now I have gotten what appears to be an automated message explaining that my tic