Feature Requests

So much AI crap uploaded with no AI tag, give us a simple way to report/flag these. https://stock.adobe.com/au/video/the-ground-erupts-in-a-violent-explosion-sending-plumes-of-dirt-and-debris-high-into-the-air/683131768https://stock.adobe.com/au/video/a-car-exploding-on-impact-engulfing-the-surrounding-area-in-a-dangerous-inferno/678974100https://stock.adobe.com/au/video/an-intense-blast-rips-through-an-oil-refinery-causing-a-chain-reaction-of-fiery-explosions-and-billowing-smoke/678974688  My work has a licence deal with Adobe for unlimited stock, but we are no longer using Adobe Stock due to all the AI generated crap. "Stock footage" is footage that has been filmed not generated. Having AI generated content on a "stock footage" website is stupid. They are 2 completly different things, and no one wants to use AI generated crap when they are looking for stock footage.

I have an corperate account. All the assets that are already licensed by my colleagues will be marked as "Licensed" when they appear in my search results as well.As a result, I wanna search for assets that has already been licensed by my colleagues, before venturing out for new assets and license them.Is there a way to do that in Stock asset search page? I know I can go through the licensed history and search there. But, there I could only see a thumbnail of the asset which is tiny! And I don't know why Adobe Stock does not provide a 'grid view' or sth. Anyway the licensed history is pretty much useless when it comes to looking for assets visually.

Adobe, why are you spending so much energy on integrating/improving AI in your products, while your horrendous & frustrating stock image search is completely ignored??? And while youre at it, revamp your abysmal Adobe Fonts site. How is a design company so unaware of it's own terribly designed products? Do better. Fix the garbage that goes ignored for years.

I am very surprised that these simple basic features are not available in Adobe Stock. It is very incovenience to user and difficult to navigate. I also spent a lot of time in order to understand the t&c of the subscription. Please make it obvious and indicate that it is saved and can unsave to library. It would be good if can select which library to save also. It's funny that I have to do manual calculation by checking back license history to know how much is my plan's balance instead get a glance by hovering over profile just like generative credit.

helloAfter I went on a photography trip workers installing solar panels it's very difficult and hard very hot work. I was surprised that on other agency this group of images sold really well. But it couldn't be sold on the Adobe website. When I looked into the buyer page, I found that This group of images is occupied by a large number of AI images.I would like to call on Adobe to support real photography quality works. that builds with manual skills and physical strength as well as true human potential by "setting image search to exclude AI images as default"Please consider this request as well. For the survival of society, high quality photography work Thanks, Best regard.

When you download AI images from Adobe Stock, they aren't saved with "Create PDF Compatible File" checked. That means the thumbnail image in Finder is the AI Icon, requiring users to open files to see what they are. Makes it hard to organize files. 

As a pickleball player and president of a large pickleball club, I have searched Adobe Stock for pickleball images for flyers and the club website. The selection I have found is atrocious. Particularly bad when you consider how many millions of pickleball players there are in the US and how fast this sport is growing. For one thing, all the balls shown are indoor balls, which have fewer and larger holes then the outdoor version, which is in far greater use. There are literally no outdoor walls picture that I could find. The other problem I had was that the AI generated content for both balls and paddles was often erroneous. It showed people playing with all manner of strange rackets as well as balls that appear to be alien in origin. Adobe can do better! I submitted this input through a chat agent and had to fight like hell just to get and to agree to pass the input along off the food chain. Now I have gotten what appears to be an automated message explaining that my tic

I can't tell you how many credits I've wasted on stock assets that are not what they claim to be. A4 mockups that aren't actually A4, "editable" vector illustrations that have been pathfindered to the point that not much can be changed, "detailed" vectors that have clearly been lazily live traced from a photo.   Please allow users the ability to rank and review stock assets so others don't waste their credits and we can improve the overall quality of stock assets. 

May I recommend the tech support gurus create a way for Adobe Stock clients to set default search parameters for their accounts? For example, rather than having to update the filters every time a new search is initiated, I'd like my default search settings to look just for:ImagesPhotosStandard ContentExclude Generative AIHorizontal I know I can always change the search parameters if necessary. However, it would be a tremendous time saver if those parameters could be set as defaults. Thank you!

Je trouve la gestion de la bibliotheque assez laborieuse. Serais-t-il possible de pouvoir retirer ou déplacer nos images en "batch"?Merci

Adobe Stock has a very large number of InDesign templates, which is great. But having more filtering options would help make it easier to find templates that match project requirements.Adding a filter for page size would be a big help. If I'm designing a letter size document, I'd like to filter out A5 templates. Similarly, filters for templates designed as spreads or single pages would be nice.

Every time I want to search for a photo on Adobe Stock I have to log out of my current profile, which forces me to save all of my documents in every open Adobe App on my desktop, close all Adobe Apps and log back in so I can "switch profiles" and gain access to Stock images. Who designs this crap? What a pain in the arse. Isn't there a better way to switch between profiles under ONE master profile without having to close everything? It is so counter productive. Why can't my educator account include Adobe Stock?

Hi All, A while back, I was expressing my concerns on AI being on by default in Stock. Post was entitled Persistent Account Based Setting to Disable Generative AI? (sorry - I don't know how to create a link to another post). I posted a rationale for my request at that time, and noted that I prefer (strongly) to work with original artists and not AI.Today, I did notice at a competitor (Shutterstock) that AI generated Images are a *SEPARATE* menu item.  So my question is: Why couldn't Adobe do something similar? That makes it really easy to ignore all of the AI ones. Yes, I did notice that Adobe recently added a feature that shows if an image is AI when you hover over it. But that doesn't solve the problem of all the clutter from AI that I still need to remember to filter out. ThanksMichael 

Is it possible to include an option to choose the size of images/files when downloading from stock? Currently, most of the images downloaded appear to be quite large, and not every image downloaded needs to be of such a large size. Since many of us use these images for web content, the process of downloading, resizing, resaving, and uploading to the website seems to be quite cumbersome. This issue was raised in 2018, and it appears that there has been no resolution to this problem yet. Could you please clarify when we can expect to have an option to choose the file size when downloading? Thank you!

I want the ability to leave a 'Like' on an Adobe Stock item that I like, and would like the ability to return to my 'Liked' stock items,This interaction can have 2 benefits:1. provide feedback to the contributor2. provide a record and repository for items that I have 'Liked' This interaction would be familiar to people who use social media.

Adobe Stock users can use the "add to library" function for every asset type except templates, such as ID: 461127207 . Can you please add this function? It would make it a lot easier when working on fast-paced projects and would likely result in increased sales.Thank you

Move the "Download to Library" modal to a global preference setting – possibly within the Creative Cloud application itself. Hiding this preference in a temporary modal that needs to be manually opened, once a download begins–and subsequently disappears once the download is complete–is not an effective way to set user preferences. My team uses carefully curated libraries to manage brand assets and logos – stock image downloads for specific projects are not part of this workflow. The current setup ensures that our libraries are cluttered with uneccesaary images that need to be removed after the fact.

I want to save a stock item to my library however I can't choose which Library I save it to.The only way to do this currently is if I change my default library. This 'Save to Library' feature would be vastly improved if we had the ability to select the specific library that we would like to save it to.

Our organization has a mix of offerings (Adobe All Apps CC, Adobe Express) that both have access to Adobe Stock. The default entitlement is confusing my users and generates a lot of calls for why they are seeing a mix of products  - Premium content for All Apps CC subscribers, and non-free content for Adobe Express subscribers. (E-001100998) is a case logged because it is not easy for my users to understand their entitlements. A feature request is to identify the user's entitlements and set the entitlements for that user so they do not see content they are not entitled to.IE: User 1 = CC Pro Plus --> set Stock entitlement to Premium on launchIE: User 2 = CC Pro --> set Stock entitlement to Standard on launchIE: User 3 = Express only --> set Stock entitlement to Free on launch I am suggesting that Adobe identify the users entitlement and then streamline offerings for Adobe Stock to increase the usability of your stock.adobe.com site. Thank you. Mik

When you click on the Heart to save a photo to the library, the heart should change to red so with other searches you will see it has been saved. 

I understand there is a filter to exclude generative AI images. I feel like this should be the default in search results with the option to include them as a filter. 

AI is a serious pain in the appendage. The new AI tag system WOULD be great if it was monitored. But when I am searching for a image, click "exclude AI" and my pages are only reduced by a couple of pages.. so I am still swimming through hoards of AI images that I can't even report... it makes the whole system a complete waste of money and time implimenting it. 

Is there a way to remove the AI option in the Adobe Stock search so that it stays off at a usser account level rather than having to remember to switch it off for each search?   [moderator modifided the subject for clarity]

I would like the ability to 'follow' stock contributors whose work I like and would like to support. This would enable people like me to be able to return to specific contributors who are providing assets that suit our requirements. Additionally, I would like to filter stock suggestions by the ones I am following. This interaction is something people would be used to from social media and would improve the efficiency of using Adobe Stock to find the assets that we require,

Hello! Some templates and filter add-ons cannot be added to a library unless licensed. Understandable. However, as I search for specific items for projects, I always come across images I like and would like to tag for future reference, much like shopping sites have a 'Save For Later' option. Some sort of bookmarking system would be super convenient rather than creating an individual link in my browser. It would also be great for team settings to share categorized selections over CC instead of sending links or screenshots of those finds.I hope this suggestion is helpful.