Build better products with our product team
I did some research recently due to a massive playback issue not too long ago with some HEVC footage I recorded with OBS Studio (for some context, the OBS footage was constant frame rate, not VFR). Here is the link to that post for reference:https://community.adobe.com/t5/premiere-pro-bugs/hevc-8-bit-4-4-4-footage-is-very-hard-to-playback-in-premiere-pro-sometimes/idi-p/14229324 To sum it up, I realized that one of the main causes for my playback issues was with Adobe's lack of support for hardware accelerated decoding for a majority of the flavors of H.264 and HEVC codecs. Here are a couple screenshots as well as links to the articles from Puget Systems back in December, 2022: Premiere Pro: https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/what-h-264-and-h-265-hardware-decoding-is-supported-in-premiere-pro-2120/DaVinci Resolve: https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/what-h-264-and-h-265-hardware-decoding-is-supported-in-davinci-resolve-studio-2122/ For some context, here are a few specs from my PC setup: CPU: Ryzen 9 7950x 16-Core, 32-ThreadGPU: NVIDIA RTX 4090RAM: 128GB of DDR5 My GPU is an RTX 4090 and even though it can decode video with NVDEC in all flavors of H.264 and HEVC codecs (including AV1, which Adobe currently doesn't support as of this post), it doesn't get used due to Adobe's lack of support for the footage I'm editing in (HEVC 8-bit 4:4:4 in MOV and MP4). And so that task is given to my CPU. However I have an AMD CPU, a Ryzen 9 7950x, and unfortunately AMD doesn't put their Video Core Next hardware core in their CPUs; unlike Intel, which puts their Quick Sync Video hardware core in their CPUs. So really, the video decoding on my system becomes software only instead of hardware accelerated. This makes the editing experience in Premiere Pro extremely difficult to manage with poor video playback in my timelines to the point where it's sometimes impossible to even work without transcoding to another codec. For now, I've been transcoding to ProRes proxies to get around my issue. Suggestion:I highly recommend Adobe enable more hardware accelerated decoding support for the different flavors of H.264 and HEVC codecs. While I understand that a lot of people are often editing 8-bit 4:2:0 footage with these codecs, having support for only this heavily overshadows editors and filmmakers that are recording in higher quality flavors of these codecs either because they want to or they simply can't afford to use ProRes due to high file sizes. Other editing platforms, such as DaVinci Resolve, currently have more hardware accelerated decoding support than Premiere Pro (as seen from the chart above) and so I would really appreciate it for Adobe to really up their game on this. I love Premiere and so I'd love to see smooth playback in my editing timelines for more types of footage!
Seria possível fazer um plugin p fazer captura vinculada pelo wi fi usando o tablet? Seria perfeito. Sem cabo e sem programas caros
Hi,I'm using the latest cloud-based version of Lightroom (not Classic), and I noticed something that makes no sense from a workflow perspective. When you delete a photo, it goes into the "Deleted" folder with a countdown (e.g., “59 days remaining”) — but Lightroom hides the file name, even though it clearly retains it internally (as it shows up again after restoring). This becomes a real problem: I want to restore a specific image because I know its filename (e.g., DSC_4025.jpg), but I can’t identify it in the deleted folder without restoring everything blindly. For professionals working with large sets, this is a serious limitation — especially when filenames are the only clue to identify files after cleanup. Please consider fixing this: just displaying the filename and maybe basic metadata (like star rating or capture date) in the Deleted section would make a big difference. Thanks.
Simple as that. I work in a team of editors in both my full time job and my freelance work, so I'm often working in the latest (read least stable) version of AE. I'm sick of only having a tiny window per year where things actually work properly before this year's new version breaks it all again. It's too much for me and obviously too much for Adobe.
Is there Generative Fill in Premiere 25.2.3? I see Generative Extend but was looking for Generative Fill (to cover TV station bugs in archival footage).
Adobe continues its practice of colluding with other corporations (AMD, Intel, Microsoft) by leaving out perfectly competent computers with AVX (up to 2013), capable of running professional programs much more demanding than LR and PS, in order to force subscribers to buy new computers with AVX2.
I'd like to see the abilty to render lights rays and haze/fog. (attached is a quick and crude example from Toolbag 4). The depth pass allows for some degree of adding fog in Photoshop. But that is not so easy to get a good look. BOGOs for the lights could be handy as well.
I think it would be a very useful feature if Patterns could be set to follow the direction of the Pattern Stamp tool brush Currently, even if the brush itself is set to rotate and follow the direction of the mouse/pen, the pattern doesn't. It keeps the same relative position to the canvas. I would like to be able to set the pattern to follow the brush and curve/distort etc appropriately.For example, if I was making a cobblestone road, and had a suitable pattern, I'd like the alignment of the bricks to be able to follow the alignment of a road I paint, like so...The Warp tool can be used for similar, but I want to be able to draw complex shapes/lines and have the pattern follow along properly.Thanks
Hi I've noticed that your generation, your Firefly generative model, is quite poor in what it Tries to do. And I think that it would be a really good idea to earn your customers Loyalty and respect if you were to simply give back Any credits after Somebody has Rated a thumbs down image AND "given a comment on why the image was not good". That will Give people an incentive to give you feedback, and it will also provide you and the team opportunities to improve your models And how it operates. All I was trying to do was to generate a coal deposit or something that you might find in Minecraft in the center of this stone texture. There was maybe 40 something results where it could not do what it was I was trying to describe it to do. So I think it would be a productive way To make Firefly better.
Can a option be added so that when an album is shared via a url that there is a download all images option? It used to be there!
Linux support is a strength of the Substance suite, adding support for Intel dedicated GPUs will add to that, especially considering the affordability of Intel GPUs and their strong support on Linux. Intel provides additional drivers for compute and media processing, similar to AMD, for their dedicated GPUs, providing features beyond the Mesa drivers.
I want to be able to use one monitor just for the image under development, or otherwise being viewed, full-screen, and the other monitor(s) for the other stuff, especially library + develop panels.
Hey , here an article : https://www.dpreview.com/articles/3278896840/head-to-head-adobe-lightroom-classic-vs-capture-one-21 So when it comes to speed we are 5 times slower. Why? Can we pls have the GPU use for "import" and "export" ? These are the most painfull tasks, you cant even do anything in the app... So GPU and something like MediaEncoder? for Lightroom. And why can´t we use the MediaEncoder for this? Its there and its fast. So for the export we would have a racehores. Then we only need something like speedy prelude for Lightroom. Who wants more speed ? more : ______ less: ________ thanxs Peter
This already exists in Premiere Pro, being able to mark effects as favourites by copying them into a custom 'bin' (folder) for easy access.
Hello, has the development of this application been stopped? We haven't received any updates for a long time and no development has been reported. I hope it hasn't been stopped. We are doing very successful work with this application. And it is a really useful application. We made about 3 thousand minutes of animation with this application and we really saved a lot of time. If Adobe wants, we can send examples of our work.
We can’t reach the Adobe servers. This may be because you’re not connected to the internet. Check your connection and try again below. If you’re still having issues, please see our connectivity troubleshooting guide. Error code: 12013.
After Effects' Displacement effect is 2D (x/y only), but with the new GLTF/FBX support, we can achieve proper 3D displacement in C4D or Blender, and import them into AE to animate lights, cameras, and other elements. But we cannot do that with animated displacement, so it's pretty limited. This is what we could have if AE got a proper 3D Displacement mode: https://superhivemarket.com/products/video-depth-ai
This is a simple UX change that would help a ton. When I am in a shape layer, and have a specific group or shape selected, hitting a shortcut key (Like R, S, or T) should open the parameters for that specific group or shape. Not the entire layer. This would help workflows a bunch! Thanks!
hello i need a way to enable the hotkey of this command that drives me crazy, forward/backward 1 frame. help me to do it, if it is not possible to do it is there a plugin to do it? has anyone solved or can guide me? my broken fingers will thank you forever. Title edited by Mod.
Grouping clips in the timeline is a very powerful but under-used feature within Premiere Pro. Part of the reason it's under-used is because once you group some clips together, there's no visual indicator in the timeline that those clips have been grouped. Feature Request: Add some type of visual indication of clips that have been grouped together in the timeline. The clip label color should remain as well as all other readable metadata, but by giving the clips a visual indicator that they are grouped, you can quickly glance the timeline and see which clips you want to stay together. This can be useful for sound bites that have been drastically edited but need to stay together. This could be useful for any of you clips in B-roll that you want to easily move and stay together. And this would be different from nesting because when you nest a clip, you can't see what's inside the nest, which is often vital when editing. If you don't know about group clips, then check out this tip: Tool Tip Tuesday for Adobe Premiere Pro: Group and Ungroup Clips in the Timeline
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.