Build better products with our product team
Hi Kevin,hello Comunity,dear Adobe,today I would like to share this feature request with you, the comunity and to Adobe:For me it would be wonderful (and a real acceleration of the workflow) to simply Drag and Drop audio files from a webpage (e. g. sites offering "sfx" and "adlibs" files or other ai stuff like "text to speech", prepared for this purpose) directly into e. g. the Premiere pro "Timeline" window in the same way as I already can do currently only with files that are located in a local folder on my hard disk.As a senior windows programmer i can provide a short working c++ win32 example how to do, since accepting files from a Webpage via "Drop" event is (in this special scenario) a bit tricky since you can't use the simple way of using the win32 function DragAcceptFiles(hwnd, TRUE); and ... case WM_DROPFILES:... in hWnd message loop.I can also provide the correct javascript sample code for implementing the Drag and Drop feature for audio files on such webpages as well.Would this be a great feature for Adobe Premiere pro and/or Adobe Audition as well?Is anyone interested?Regards,Martin
Hi,there are options for VR180 and VR360 sequences but no option for 3D sbs video.Is it possible to add the frame-packing=3 info to the metadata in the export tab so this info is added to the exported video?At the moment I have to add this metadata with ffmpeg by creating a new video which is a bad solution.Or is there any metadata editor software which can add this info to a video file?Thanks for your help!
Adobe please restore previous PS functionality! In previous versions of PS, users pull out a guide and it remains the color spec'd in preferences. Now, in 2024 PS, when the guides are adjusted, they turn blue. There's no way to disable this, or turn it another color. Blue is hard to see and this is very annoying. Adobe, please return this function to the way it was, or allow users to either disable it or adjust the color. PLEASE!I need your help fellow Photoshoppers, I'd love to see a lot of upvotes for this! Thank you!
I've seen a plugin that adds layers to LR which would save a lot of to-ing and fro-ing to Photoshop. The plugin is actually stand-alon, but also integrates with LR to some extent. It allows many of the layer options found in Photoshop. Not tried it but seems like a cracking idea! 🙂 Making LR more of an editor could make Photoshop redundant for pure photographic work
We should have the ability to create custom frames to make pictures fit in other shapes (e.g., a polygon). I proposed that this idea be integrated into the lasso tools, marquee tools, shapes tools, and even the pen tool via a button that will convert the shape or section into a usable picture frame. This feature should also be available under the frame tool section for added convenience. The frame tool seems lacking, and there should have more functionality. Adding this feature will expand the use of the frame tool functionality for newer releases of Photoshop. I hope this idea will be useful to fellow Photoshop users as well. Let me know what you think about this idea. Thank you!
I would love to see some sort of support for the extra data baked into photos taken on the new iPhone 16 series phones. I'm not expecting it to work exactly the same, but there is clearly more data contained in these files that would allow for more editing latitude. For example, I have been shooting with the tone at -50 in order to add some more contrast to my photos. I feel comfortable setting this as the default becuase I know I am able to recover any of the detail in the shadows that is lost due to this setting by readjusting the photo later. The issue is that when I import into Lightroom I basically lose all editing latitude outside of the image that is uploaded. The good news is the data is retained. I tested by round tripping a photo from Apple Photos to Lightroom and back. Once the Photo was back in Apple Photos I was still able to edit the Photographic Style. It would just be nice for Lightroom to be able to access this data since the round trip is kind of a clunky way to recover data when needed.
When creating AI graphics in 672x384 resolution nothing is visible at least 1000x500. No details and we lose valuable tokens.
This is my first feature suggestion, and it comes as a user of my partners hardware/software (I only own CS6 and share their editor as a result, as an amateur.) Suggestion This suggestion pertains to the introduction of some sort of automatic correction for "non-flat" masks- or to put forward a simple use case, polarizer sky correction. This should be done with masks for the simple reason that this allows more flexibility, and could be added as an option under "Effects" as the new masks panel has beem revamped. Possible Method In the case of "polarizer sky" an easier solution would be something along the lines of using automatic gain control (AGC) with 2D windows on the image mask. This would run into issues where you have e.g. a very busy sky- hence it may be necessary to allow the user to not just state they want to eliminate polarizer sky, but be able to vary the windows used for the AGC (unless they want to knock out all the dynamic range in their sky by balancing all the pixels out to zero.) With large enough windows (and polarizer sky is a fairly broad effect) this should be a non-issue. Being able to specify a colour range for the AGC calculation, but applying the AGC over the entire mask (inclusive of non-selected colours- you could do an intercept for other colours if wanted!), would be good. An alternative solution would be training ML to identify the general "flatness" of the background of the image mask, and then apply corrections appropriately. Alternative solutions? There are already plugins for Photoshop capable of doing this for astrophotos- ProDigital software has a few- but specifically doing this in Lightrooom with masks would be a fantastic addition, in my opinion, and would be something quite unique.
The filter features and font previews in Photoshop are very useful but in Premiere it's a lot more basic and the fonts aren't previewed so harder to judge how they will look.
It would be great if I could crop images in Lightroom while using the Reference View. Right now, a user can edit an image in Lightroom in Reference View. This shows the image that will be edited, and an image reference next to the image that will be edited, so users can edit the photo to match their chosen reference. Once 'crop' is clicked, reference view disappears and is only crop-mode. It would be great if I could crop while still in Reference View, so I can match the angle and positioning of the reference photo. If I want my images to have the same positioning, I have to crop, then click back, crop, click back, crop, click back... having cropping inside reference view would make it a 1 step process to get images to look uniform.
Feature: a dropdown menu within the "Crop" tab that allows you to save/view/compare different crops of an image - i.e. with different aspect ratios, sizing or other adjustments. Note: this would be similar to the "Verions" tool however different in that any following edits to lighting, healing, masking, etc. would apply to all of the crop versions. I also realize some of the this functionality could be done by duplicating images and cropping each differently, but that really clutters my library so having this live within the single image itself would be much cleaner. Benefit 1: The big advantage of this over the "Versions" tool is it allows you to try out different crops much earlier in the editing workflow, for instance during culling even. Perhaps it's just my own preference, but I like to explore crop options pretty early, so that I know the "potential" of a given image - sometimes it seeing how I could crop an image tells me if it is worth it to spend the more time consuming effort of ediitng the lighting, healing, masking, etc. By being able to save crops, I could do this earlier in my editing workflow and it'd allow me to better select which images I should then spend the time to edit further, while my crop configruations remain saved for later. Benefit 2: When I am printing or exporting images, I like to be able to compare different crops and aspect ratios, currently within the "Crop" tab, it's not easy to quickly toggle back and forth (when you select a new aspect ratio is usually isn't sized or placed currently on the image). This feature would allow me to adjust a few different crops really particularly then click back and forth to compare. Theoretically, this one could be done with "Versions", however I often will return at the very end of the process for a few further image edits, and with "Versions" all of the older versions would not get these edits. In short: This feature would streamline my workflow, both at the front end (culling) and back end (exporting). Below I've attached a couple images showing a rough mockup of what this feature might look like. I'd image it could live as a dropdown menu within the "Crop" tab, where you can save and name new configurations. Each configuration could have unique aspect ratios and/or sizing, and perhaps also the geometry/distortion corrections too. Hopefully others agree on the value of this feature. Thanks for the consideration.
Hi, I'm a photographer who's unhappy with Adobe. It's bad enought that we're forced to use a subscription based software that seemingly has issues with every update that causes a loss of time in figuring out how to do the same thing I did before. Now Adobe is advertising "skip the photoshoot", and that AI is the "new digital camera". Have we reached a point where not even Adobe values photographers? I thought it would be budget minded clients that pushed me out of this industry, but increasingly, it seems to be tone deaf Adobe. Is anyone else tired of Adobe's hamster wheel? https://petapixel.com/2024/05/03/adobe-throws-photographers-under-the-bus-again-skip-the-photoshoot/
Now that many of us are on iOS 18, I believe we would all appreciate the integration of its new features in concert with Lightroom, such as an Lr Camera launch option in the Shortcuts app and as a Lock Screen toggle 🙂
When inserting a larger image that exceeds the canvas area, pressing Ctrl+T (for resizing) should have the default position set to the top-left corner (or remember the previous position).In the resize function, there should be an additional button to automatically scale the entire image to fit the canvas size, instead of just having rotate and flip options. This would be a much more useful feature than rotate and flip.The current resizing options are limiting. A "Fit to Canvas" feature would be much more practical and accessible for everyday use than rotate and flip.This function would streamline workflows and save time for users who frequently need to resize images. Many users, especially those working with large or multiple images, face this challenge. It would benefit a broad user base, not just a niche group.
With a big document it can take so long to find things nested within layer groups, often you need to scroll forever. I often have more than 500 layers in a document It would be great to be able to put in bookmarks which would also be acessable via shortcuts to jump around the layer panel. These could be added next to the layer search bar, see attachedFurther more dragging a layer or group over the bookmark at the top would place this layer just above (or below if alt is held) Further to this it would be great if we could split the view of the layer panel into 2 so if there is 2 sections of a document that need work you could keep each part visible. Obviously it would also be great to be able to drag layers between these sub panels if needed.
Missing the zoom scroll that was available in the program monitor - Premiere Pro. Now when you zoom the image gets croppend and there is no way to scroll up and down or side ways and by doing so seeing the image in detail.
This one is a real pain. A lot of people like this feature when Lumetri panel is open, I don't. Is there an option to turn it off permanently? Currently, it gets checked automatically every-time I switch to the Lumetri Workspace. Seriously need a way to stop this behaviour!
Hi Adobe!As for Mac User, i suppose if its possible, please make middle mouse funtion more reliable, for example, middle mouse click for drag around timeline instead of H key, and scroll of middle mouse should zoom in and zoom out at exact point of the mouse on timeline (without hold option key)with precision (if i scoll too fast, premier pro gonna act weirdly).
I work extensively with deeply-layered screen-resolution documents (ie. mock-ups). I like to keep my history -- or at least some of it -- of experiments as Layer Comps. But every now and again, these PSDs will get prohibitively heavy. So what I'm looking for is a command, or script, that will let me purge any layer which is not visible in ANY Layer Comp in the file. Does such a script exist?
Hi guys, I've been working with PS for more than 10 years and I found a few things that should be tackled in future versions. However there is one feature which I am really missing ever since. It would have saved me a lot of time, and (to me) it's so obvious: projects! I simply want to save my current status of photoshop, including my opened documents and their positions on the workspace. The reason simply is, that I am regularely working with more than just a few files at the same time. I am in the games and web business working with lots and lots of smaller assets. If I need to shut down my computer (which is actually required in my company over night) then I have to reload all my files manually on the next working day. I think this feature has to go into PS in one imaginable way or another after so many years. Even more as there are a number of other Adobe Tools (e.g. After Effects) which had that from the beginning. And PS isn't bound to one single field in graphics anymore - it's being used in many different ways - I gave you my example. Please do me a favor and seriously consider implementing this in the next version. If you need more input I'd be more than happy to hear from you ;-) Mig Marn
A small change I think would be helpful is something I'm used to when working in AVID: the ability to name tracks the same thing. I find being able to name multiple tracks "SFX", for example, is simpler than having to name them "SFX 1", "SFX 2", etc. This way you can group them all as the same name if you prefer, but still lets you number them if you’d prefer. Just a thought! Thanks.
Two Suggestions:1) Be able to re-position Reference Image Gallery images toward the top and lock them down from randomly moving each time feature is selected. Makes them easier to find. Also label the reference images so that the process chosen can be documented for future reference.2) Allow the Content Type, Reference Images, and Effects to be applied to an existing photograph and not having to use a prompt to apply the A.I. to a person's own photo.
We need to be able to search shared albums in Lightroom so that all team members could easily find a specific image by keyword, tag, attribute, ...etc.
Dear Adobe Premiere Pro Team,I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to suggest an enhancement to the transcription feature in Adobe Premiere Pro, which I believe could significantly improve the workflow for users who work with video transcriptions.Currently, after generating a transcription, it is segmented into separate blocks of text corresponding to different timestamps. While this segmentation helps with syncing text to the audio, it limits the flexibility for users who wish to edit the transcription in a continuous format (for example, removing line breaks or combining sections). As of now, there seems to be no way to paste an edited, continuous transcription back into Premiere Pro while maintaining its link to the original audio.My suggestion is to enable users to paste an edited transcription back into Premiere Pro and have it automatically re-sync to the audio. This feature would:Allow users to remove unnecessary breaks or combine sections of text for a cleaner and more efficient editing process.Maintain the automatic syncing of the transcription with the corresponding audio, streamlining the review and adjustment of captions or subtitles.Significantly reduce the time spent on manually reformatting or adjusting transcriptions when working with long-form content.This improvement would greatly benefit editors who rely on transcriptions for quick edits, particularly in documentary, interview, and educational content where precise syncing of audio and text is essential.I believe this feature could enhance the user experience and save considerable time during post-production. I hope this suggestion can be considered for a future update to Premiere Pro.Thank you for your attention, and I look forward to seeing how Premiere Pro continues to evolve.Best regards,Gustavo Orioli.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.