Skip to main content
February 22, 2009
Question

My top ten criteria for the new forums

  • February 22, 2009
  • 125 replies
  • 10089 views
This is my view on what the new forums should provide. This is what I'll personally be measuring the new forums against when we have a fully testable beta version.

=================================================================

1 - The new forums should encourage the participation of new members, both to feel encouraged to seek help in the first place, but also to stay and become long-term contributing members of the online community here.

2 - The new forums should alienate the existing users as little as possible, as there's no point in having questions with no answers - though equally there's no point in having answers with no questions. A tricky balance to strike.

3 - Response of the forums should be no worse, and hopefully better, than typical performance here in recent months. If that means beefing up the hardware to accommodate the demands of more graphic-intensive software, so be it.

4 - The forums should look not unlike the majority of typical modern internet forums. This will not be favoured by those familiar with the sparse appearance of the present forums, but incoming new members expect to see something that looks more contemporary and familiar in style, even if there's a modest performance cost.

5 - They should function not unlike the majority of modern internet forums, in terms of the user interface and usable features. If you've got your first problem with Adobe software and you arrive in the Adobe forums for the first time, you don't want then to be confronted with something that looks like another problem and which takes time and effort to understand. The learning curve should be absolutely minimal. There should be a very low turn-away rate (potential users taking one look and backing off before participating or even complaining).

6 - The search function should be state of the art. If you have a good manual for the product software, a good user interface for it, and a good search engine for the knowledgebase and forums, the number of questions needing to be asked should be significantly lower.

7 - To support the regular participants it should be possible to list the discussions which have unread posts in any given member's selected forums, and within those discussions it should be possible to go directly to the unread content without scrolling around to find it. It should then be possible to go to the next unread post in the next unread discussion without first going backwards to the overall list.

8 - NNTP access, though a mystery to me, seems highly valued by some, and providing it does not seem to mess with what the rest of us see (setting aside the quoting problem), so let's have it.

9 - An effective mechanism to enforce the forum rules by restricting access by individuals who persistently break the rules should be provided - and there should be no simple way round it. Failing that, provision of an inbuilt method for users to ignore posts by other specified users is necessary.

10 - There should be a properly functioning list of banned words.

=================================================================

That's my top ten list of criteria - though in five minutes I'll probably think of some key stuff I have left out.

What's yours?
    This topic has been closed for replies.

    125 replies

    February 23, 2009
    > If I have to deal with all the wasted space, I will likely quit visiting the forums.

    Me too.
    Inspiring
    February 23, 2009
    I suggested the preference option about a week ago. Turning off avatars and signatures (and allowing the column to shrink to 0 as a result) would satisfy me and leave them as an option for those that love those things. If I have to deal with all the wasted space, I will likely quit visiting the forums. I just don't have the time to waste scanning things that have always been visible in one screen, but are headed to 2 or 3 screens because of the space waste.
    PJonesCET
    Participating Frequently
    February 22, 2009
    If they could be implemented I wouldn't object. In fact I would probably use the one for signatures. The only one I'd be interested in is the Avatars.
    February 22, 2009
    Yeah, Phos, those options would be very good to have.
    Known Participant
    February 22, 2009
    The problem is, Phil, is that I searched around pretty deeply on the Jivespace site and can find no indication that those 2 prefs I screencapped above even exist in the Clearspace user control panel.

    At least, not without some major customization.
    PJonesCET
    Participating Frequently
    February 22, 2009
    That's perfectly okay.

    That way people that are interested in viewing and posting avatars and signatures can, and those that don't set so they don't.

    If anyone frequents Apples Forum almost longtime members use some type of Avatar. while only the new folks don't. If you notice I've been a long standing member since March 24, 2005. Actaully its been longer, But they went through a major design change about that time and lost all that information in the redesign. I see they have gone through another redesign since that period because for several years I didn't visit because of the original change. I original Joined about the same time I got my G4-500.
    Known Participant
    February 22, 2009
    And here's a screen shot from my prefs page on the MacTech forums, a set of choices that should be available for ANY forum that allows users to post avatars and signature files:

    PJonesCET
    Participating Frequently
    February 22, 2009
    And here is avatar used on apple's forum why represent the major of forum I frequent that use avatars:

    PJonesCET
    Participating Frequently
    February 22, 2009
    No there is no magnification. They reduce the avatar down slightly less Than other forums I use avatars on, their's are larger.
    PJonesCET
    Participating Frequently
    February 22, 2009
    Thanks Kathy Howard3 gave the anser looking for.

    Okay I used SnapzProX to make png image which I put on my website.

    here is image:



    Note if not for the button, and the information boxes used in the same space as the avatar. the area where the avatar would only be as wide as the image with.

    Not sure ift here will be any magnification of the image. But I'll be back to let you know if so.