Stock Contributors

Hi!I'm new in the comunity and I would appreciate your help to find out why this photograps were rejected. Is it because high-key? (cut out whites) or too shallow depth of field? I am confused... 😞

  Hi all, I just had this images rejected for Stock Upload.Could anyone give me a reson why?Many thansk.

Is there any way to change the credit cost once an image has been uploaded?  I have noticed that many of my pictures are mispriced.  Thanks Mike

Dear Adobe Contributor Relations,                                                         Sir, I am very respectful of you but I can ask a question my Adobe Stock/Fotolia account has been blocked because you will have become aware of activity in my account that is non-compliant with your Terms of Use. So kindly tell us your term. So that we can correct our mistakes maybe I get a mistake because we are all human and most mistakes work on humans. So I apologize for this mistake kindly ignore my mistake and please you can unblock my account I will wait for your answer.  ReplyForward

Buenos días, Me gustaría saber vuestra opnión del rechazo de las siguientes fotos.  

welcomefirst time i tried to put my collection on stock, i was rejected by "quality problems" as experts please tell me what to improve and what to avoid and if these example photos are salvageable one is a panorama made in jpeg and the other using a 48MPx drone. Also a question, maybe someone is adding mockups rendered from Blender, what size is best to use for rendering

por que la foto fue rechazada con el motivo de "PROBLEMAS DE CALIDAD" cual puede ser el problema.  

Hi everybody I posted those three pictures but Adobe told there is a quality issues on these . Please can you give me some advices for the next time ? 

Hey folks, I've been reading through everyone else's reasons for why things get kicked out due to quality. A common theme appears to be underexposure or ISO noise.  So a couple of questions on that. The drink shot here I'm guessing is getting flagged as either underexposed or out of focus. To the latter, that's unfortunate, b/c the image actually is in focus but the condensation on the glass might trick a reviewer to think it isn't. Not much I can do about that if that's the case. However, at what point is contrast not flagged as an exposure issue? Is this as simple as correcting the black point of the image? Or is it simply one they have a bazillion of and are telling me no? I'm not sure why the Hawk photo & songbird were booted, open to any insights. I'm guessing they didn't like something in the color balance in the Hawk photo as the background looks like it might be skewing a certain direction but I have no clue about songbird. Appreciate the feedback! 

Hello, all of the following were rejected due to quality issues, do you have some recommendations? Should I just make them brighter?

Hi, Any thoughts as to why this was rejected? Will

I've recently joined Adobe Stock and have successfully submitted a match of illustrations which have already started being downloaded by users, so I got excited and spent a lot of time uploading almost 100 more! However, the most recent batch were mass rejected for 'certain keyword or title errors'. I don't understand why, as I kept the titles and keywords very simple and relevant. The images were of cute animals in winter sweaters that I think would be highly suitable for Christmas cards. Here is an example of what I added: TITLE: Illustration of a ferret in a Nordic sweater, fantasy winter forest scene with festive lights and snowKEYWORDS: illustration, drawing, christmas, xmas, seasonal, festive, cosy, snow, forest, woodland, portrait, card, ferret, cute, funny I have resubmitted with minimal keywords now, stripping out stuff like 'cute' and 'funny' (even though these were actually 'suggested keywords' I clicked to add, thinking 'more info is better'). I've seen

These two photos taken in a winter dawn, maybe they have little light..but i think 100% no noise or blur. What is your opinion? 

I'm a new contributor, so please bear with me.I've 41 approved photos, however my public portfolio page shows the older 26 photos, newer ones are not visible. I thought it would take time for them to show up, but it's already been nearly 3 weeks. Any ideas on how to resolve this issue?Portfolio URL: https://stock.adobe.com/contributor/200465538/russellThanks!

Je me demande combien il y a de contributeurs ?..j ai entendu dire que c etait la plus grande concentration d artistes dans le stock photo...Je suis curieuse..

Ich habe bereits hunderte Illustrationen veröffentlicht allerdings kam ab und zu mal die meldung dass ich einen Property release oder eine Modellfreigabe dazu schicken soll obwohl in meinen Illustrationen keine echte menschen zu sehen sind sondern meine eigene Kreationen (bei welchen man auch sieht dass dies keine echten Menschen sind). Nun wurden 13 Illustrationen auf "Errinerung" gestellt damit ich einen property release bzw eine Modellfreigabe anhänge.Nun meine Frage. Ich habe schon einmal versucht einen Property release an 3 bilder ran zu hängen allerdings wurde dieser abgelehnt. Mache ich etwas falsch ? ich habe wie bei Eigentümer als auch bei Künstler meinen Namen und meine email reingeschrieben, daraufhin habe ich direkt zwei emails erhalten in welchen ich erst für den Eigentümer dann für den Künstler unterschreiben musste. Soweit sollte dies doch richtig sein oder ?Und ist es möglich einen Property release zu erstellen ohne angehängte Illustration und diese dann bei all meinen

Hello! Can you please tell me what are the quality issues? All these photos are not accepted. Thank you!    

Hello.. I am new to adob stock.. I submitted an image for the first time but it was rejected. Can anyone help me please understand why?

I WANT TO SUBMIT MY PHOTOS VIA IPHONE, IS THERE ANY APP VIA I CAN DO SO?

Bonjour pourquoi que j' ai un PROBLÈMES DE QUALITÉ avec cette image ?

This was rejected somehow.  Here is the full res link: https://postimg.cc/mhtV8CKH  I don't see any artifacts, nothing is out of focus, etc... Thanks... 

Please provide a reason for rejecting recent photos.Please specify exactly what is wrong.thank youRobert

I pay as a Contributor to Adobe Stock and have noticed that my submissions have been in review for longer and longer times.  Right now (2 December) I have stuff in there from September, still in review status.  I'm extremely frustrated after calling (where they referred me to sending an email), chatting (where they just left me hanging several times), emailing (haven't heard anything days later still), and sending a message through the Contact Us link (I guess it went to NoWhere).  This is my last resort before canceling my Contributor account and saving the approx. $100/month.  Is this happening to anyone else?  If there's something I'm doing wrong (which I was doing right for 5+years) or something has changed, they had several chances to tell me.   [Moderator moved the thread to the correct forum]

HiEveryone feels happy as a contributor when he/she check thier statistics and find a great downloads hits in a short time, then suddenly you begin to wonder why and what's the purpose behind it, a re-selling! for example. So do Adobe proivde protection to our content if that happened? considering that the content is uploaded only at Stock Adobe. Thanks