• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

Offset effect has different behavior with LoopOut expression than expected?

Explorer ,
Jul 30, 2017 Jul 30, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi,

Im trying to use LoopOut("continue") expression on the Offset effect, AE 2017.

The problem is that it seams the continue loop has some relation with the Comp size vs the Layer Size.

If ratio is the same the offset effect continues at the same speed, If ratio is smaller or bigger the speed is smaller

or bigger respectively.

Does any one has a solution?

Thank you

01.JPG02.JPG03.JPG

TOPICS
Expressions

Views

1.7K

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Explorer , Aug 03, 2017 Aug 03, 2017

Glad you found it helpful! If you don't mind marking it "Helpful" and "Correct" in case another user has a similar issue that would be great.

Per the issue with the loopOut("Continue") :

     I was able to replicate your issue, I'm unsure as to whether it would be considered a bug or not.

If you use : loopOut("offset")

     Your progression will remain linear regardless of the layer resolution.

Votes

Translate

Translate
LEGEND ,
Jul 31, 2017 Jul 31, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Effects are always relative to the layer size. Of course this will affect certain calculations. Nothing unusal here.

Mylenium

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Explorer ,
Jul 31, 2017 Jul 31, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thanks for you reply.

Im sorry, but that is not true.

In cs6 that didn't work like that.

Second, all the idea of loopout continue expression is that it holds the same velocity at the last keyframe.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Explorer ,
Aug 01, 2017 Aug 01, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hey Coresmith, would be helpful to have more info on what you're attempting to achieve with this.

From the looks of your images, it may be more prudent to use a time based expression if you want the value to increase perpetually (ie. [time*50, 500]

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Explorer ,
Aug 03, 2017 Aug 03, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi,

Thanks, that was a grate suggestion.

I also reported that behavior as a bug as I still dont understand

why it considered as an usual behavior(?)

Thaks again

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Explorer ,
Aug 03, 2017 Aug 03, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Glad you found it helpful! If you don't mind marking it "Helpful" and "Correct" in case another user has a similar issue that would be great.

Per the issue with the loopOut("Continue") :

     I was able to replicate your issue, I'm unsure as to whether it would be considered a bug or not.

If you use : loopOut("offset")

     Your progression will remain linear regardless of the layer resolution.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines