Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
  • 한국 커뮤니티
0

PSD vs smallest image performance and optimisation

New Here ,
Jul 01, 2020 Jul 01, 2020

I'm setting out to make something with a LOT of layers with a big image, before I start I am wondering if I will see any performance diffrerence between using a layered PSD. (prefered option for workflow) or using seperate images of the smallest possible size. Basically will the empt canvas areas on layers eat up any performance. Would I be better getting a workflow with individual files.

TOPICS
How to , Performance
206
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jul 01, 2020 Jul 01, 2020

Having them on different layers in Photoshop would probably be easier on both the machine and the AE user.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Jul 01, 2020 Jul 01, 2020

That's music to my ears! thanks heaps 🙂

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Jul 01, 2020 Jul 01, 2020
LATEST

AE is a full buffer renderer and doesn't care how pixel data was provided/ generated once it's stored in its internal buffers. The only point of relevance would be file I/O considerations - many small files are more taxing than a single file with multiple internal data streams. That's entirely an operating system thing, though, and beyond AE's control.

 

Mylenium

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines