I have to say that the results I get from generative fill in photoshop are absolutely terrible. Why is adobe including a poor quality function? Not only do the image results look unrealistic but the reults are in low resolution, so absolutely no use whatsoever to a print designer. Might be fun for someone trying out photoshop for personal use, but when I pay a lot of money for a professional application and it includes a function that is dreadful then there is big problem in my opinion. Can adobe either make functions that work to a high standard or drop the monthy subscription price to reflect how poor AI is.
To be super clear, AI in Photoshop is possibly the worst software experience one could have. It is shameful that it is let out, a clear sign of greed to let people think something exists.
Victor, you need to be specific. Photoshop has used Ai in multiple ways for some years now with the various Sensei enhanced functions. I agree that Generative Fill can be challenging to use, but the much improved selection and cleanup tools are sensationally good. We can work much faster than we could ten years ago, and so more accurately with much better results.
4
Replies
AdChoices