Lordy me I've tried so hard to get this right with multicams and audio tracks. I'm cutting a film that in any given scene as 1 to 10 actors mic'd up. It is inconsisten which actors are on which channel. Often times the sound mixer would record with 10 channels running, but only 2 actors are speaking, so when building/syncing my clips in a multicam sequence, I'd go through and delete the empty or noisy tracks. I'd even then go to modify>audio channels to make sure the sequence didn't retain 10 channels when I now only had, say, 6 that I needed (I'm using 'channels' and 'tracks' kind of interchangeably here).
So here's my problem: now that I'm editing, my eliminating those tracks in the multicam doesn't seem to matter – they still show up in my edit sequence. Where the audio is in the multicam sequence seems to be irrelevant – when I pull it into my sequence it is referencing the original tracks. So after all that work, every time I splice in a new clip into my edit I have to re-figure out and eliminate the offending tracks/channels.
Maybe it's better with pictures...
Multicam: only channels/tracks with audio. Channels 1-4, 7-8, an LR mixdown, and then camera audio (muted). This is how I want it when I edit this clip into my edit sequence. Seems like this would make sense.
What actually happens in my Edit Sequence: Channels 1-8 (including 5 & 6 which are empty and of no use), no LR mixdown.
So here's my question: how can I get premiere to treat track 1 in the multicam as track 1 when I edit, track 2 as track 2, etc. The only solution that seems available is to reroute one-by-one thousands of multicam clips so that this is the case. This is ludicrous. Where did I go wrong?
I'm really at a loss and demoralized. It shouldn't be this GD complicafted. Grateful to the hive mind. I just want to edit!
12
Replies
Hi Paul. Attached is a screenshot of the track mixer and audio channel format settings.
I understand and am aware of your second point, but your first point is confusing and seems to be where the problem lies. I think? Could you elaborate? And what should I have done/still hopefully can do to have it work so that what's in the multicam is what ends up in my timeline? And if the answer is to re-route every single track in every single clip, well – is there something I missed when I made the multicam that would have this not be the case? this just all seems terribly counterintuitive to me as it stands right now. I'm laughing out loud at how extraordinarily frustrating Premiere seems to operate in this matter, but am hoping it can be fixed.
When I first made the multicam clip using the Create Multicam Source Sequence process, it had 10 tracks. 8 for the ISO.wav file, 2 for the LR.wav file (stereo file broken into two mono files); it didn't seem to account for the A cam audio and B cam audio in the modify>audio channels setup. I deleted the two bad tracks from the ISO.wav file (5 & 6) in the multicam sequence, deleted the now empty tracks from the sequence, and then went to modify>audio channels, and knocked the # of tracks from 10 to 8. I thought this would leave me with channels 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8 and the LR mixdown tracks, as that is what exists in the multicam sequence. But upon bringing the clip into my actual edit, that is not the case.
If it helps, to highlight my issue I did a test. It's a multicam that originally looks like this upon initial creation: 8 tracks of production audio + 1 stereo track (which will be broken out into 2 mono tracks) of LR mixdown plus 1 camera audio track that just seems to be ignored for whatever reason, which is fine.
Even if I go in and delete ALL the audio accept the LR mixdown track like this:
it still goes into my edit timeline like this:
What gives? If I had 10 cameras and was to delete all the video tracks but one, it wouldn't still think it was a multicam clip with 10 cameras. I don't know if this simplified/exaggerated example makes me conundrum clearer.
AdChoices