Participant

解決済み

Could someone please provide advice on the reasons behind the rejection of these pictures?

Forum|Forum|2 years ago
June 27, 2023
返信数 4.
3942 ビュー

Are these AI-generated pictures being rejected due to the out-of-focus background? Any advice regarding this matter would be highly appreciated.

このトピックへの返信は締め切られました。

解決に役立った回答 Abambo

How on EARTH is someone managing to upload thousands of assets a week??

When I was making AI Images

1) I had to first brainstorm the idea,

2) Then run it through midjourney..(usually at least twice to get what I actually wanted)

3) Upscale it

4) write up a property release via a pdf editor release if it needed one

5) upscale the property release

6) upload the image to adobe stock

7) write tags

😎 submit the property release

9) pray it doesn't get rejected

All this takes time and you say one guy is doing THOUSANDS?

does he have literally no life?

That's insane........

and i'm not sure if people should even be allowed to discriminate and filter out AI Images. It's a bit like racism ..but for pictures lol.

and i'm not sure if people should even be allowed to discriminate and filter out AI Images. It's a bit like racism ..but for pictures lol.

By @Anthony280912442jrz

Well, customers asked for that. If a customer wants a real person instead of a fake one, they want a real person. And as it's the customer who pays, they are king.

But the reason behind those furious demands from the customers was and is the bad quality of AI assets. Six fingers, three hands, six legs… and artefacts, artefacts and artefacts. You name the fault, you get it!

Abambo

Community Expert

3.52... : Artefacts in the out of focus area:

but also with the glass and the chips:

The whole image does not look to be very sharp.

3.32xx: Obviously, as you use the same process, you find the same or similar artefacts.

I agree with @Test Screen Name 's mutant olive. Looks nice, but not realistic. In addition, the picture is not level. The stick is also somewhat strange:

3.42XX: idem. In addition, what really stroke my eyes was this item:

If you can explain the physics of that, you will get nominated for the Nobel Prize.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

A

Anthony280912442jrz

Participating Frequently

"If you can explain the physics of that, you will get nominated for the Nobel Prize."

I'm dead 😂😂🤣

Abambo

Community Expert

I'm dead 😂😂🤣

By @Anthony280912442jrz

But I hope only generative AI death! 😉

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

A

Anthony280912442jrz

Participating Frequently

at a quick glace I can't spot nothing wrong with it. Had you uploaded that before February it would have gone through no problems but since then the flood of AI images has got so great that they are now really really picky over AI images and will study your image under a microscope and literally nitpick at everything..

How much are you earning from your AI pictures? I had about 50 images images up that were getting the occasional download between janruary and april but since then absolutely nothing and i suspect it's to do with increased competition due the floods of people looking to get rich quick off AI images...

anyways i've stopped uploading anything for like 3 months now. The Return On Investment for this just isn't worth my time..

Abambo

Community Expert

at a quick glace I can't spot nothing wrong with it. Had you uploaded that before February it would have gone through no problems but since then the flood of AI images has got so great that they are now really really picky over AI images and will study your image under a microscope and literally nitpick at everything..

By @Anthony280912442jrz

For a moderator, the refusal of these assets comes with a very quick glance, as they only need to see a first reason for refusing. You do not need a microscope. You only need to look at the picture at 100%. You should do the same with your assets.

I had about 50 images images up that were getting the occasional download between janruary and april but since then absolutely nothing and i suspect it's to do with increased competition due the floods of people looking to get rich quick off AI images...

By @Anthony280912442jrz

Maybe you are right with the flood of submitted AI assets. They are now in the millions present in the database. And many buyers simply blend them out when searching for assets, as a) quality is not good and b) they want real images. It will be as always: some contributors are getting the downloads. I read about a contributor with 40,000 AI assets adding thousands of new assets a week. Your 50 assets won't show up in a search…

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

A

Anthony280912442jrz

Participating Frequently

How on EARTH is someone managing to upload thousands of assets a week??

When I was making AI Images

1) I had to first brainstorm the idea,

2) Then run it through midjourney..(usually at least twice to get what I actually wanted)

3) Upscale it

4) write up a property release via a pdf editor release if it needed one

5) upscale the property release

6) upload the image to adobe stock

7) write tags

😎 submit the property release

9) pray it doesn't get rejected

All this takes time and you say one guy is doing THOUSANDS?

does he have literally no life?

That's insane........

and i'm not sure if people should even be allowed to discriminate and filter out AI Images. It's a bit like racism ..but for pictures lol.

Jill_C

Community Expert

I agree with the comments of @Test Screen Name. Each of these images have rendering errors in one or more of the objects in the frame. Additionally, you should not be submitting AI assets in PNG format.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

HaraLine作成者

Participant

Thank you for the response. It is much appeciated. What format should the assets should be submitted in?

Jill_C

Community Expert

Generative AI assets should be jpg. PNG should only be used for images with a transparent background.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

T

Test Screen Name

Legend

Since these are photorealistic they will be checked for realisticness. It's a weakness of much AI work, often needing a lot of time consuming correction. My opinions (for what they are worth):

#1 - out of focus is fine, but I don't think the background out of focusness is realistic, especially the light spots.And what shape is the table?

#2 - that's one strange mutant olive

#3 - shadow from glassware is too sharp and the light angles are wrong. But more to the point, what is that thing behind the glass, or perhaps through the glass, and what is holding it up.

HaraLine作成者

Participant

Thank you, that was helpful.

サインアップ

ソーシャルログイン

コミュニティへログイン

ソーシャルログイン

ファイルをウイルススキャンする。

このファイルはダウンロードできません