Inspiring

質問

I'm confused - original modeled and rendered abstract images refused acceptance for IP violation.

Forum|Forum|3 years ago
July 1, 2022
返信数 3.
3657 ビュー

I had submitted four original images that I had modeled and rendered - all four were refused at the same time and for the same reason - "Intellectual Property Refusal." There are no recognizable protected images or descriptions .. The images are attached. How can these be IP violations? To add to the confusion - the last image has a "sister" image I did that is similar (same model, same lighting but with outward radiating waves instead of turbulent waves) that was already accepted. How do I fix this and prevent it in the future?

Confused...

このトピックへの返信は締め切られました。

RALPH_L

Community Expert

You, as the artist, have to submit an IP release.

D

DarkClearSky作成者

Inspiring

Is there a way to create a single blanket release for a series of images that contain the same IP elements?

Abambo

Community Expert

Is there a way to create a single blanket release for a series of images that contain the same IP elements?

By @DarkClearSky

The first three would be OK with the same reference. If you include the second reference too, you could work with one release assigned to all variants.

In addition, you can prepare a property release prefilled with your data, where you just need to add the dates and the reference.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Davida02

Inspiring

Una de las cosas que pudo haber pasado es que las 4 imagenes son iguales si subes varias fotos y todas tienen el mismo patrón no te la van a aceptar.

D

DarkClearSky作成者

Inspiring

Thanks but the images were distinct - although three of them had the same "theme."

Abambo

Community Expert

If you are the original creator, submit a property release as suggested in the manual. How can the moderator know tgat the creation is yours. And how can Adobe prove tgat, when the buyer gets attacked in the courts.

Read the contributors nanual for more information. If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Abambo

Community Expert

Adendum: The "sister" image has been accepted, because hunans take the decision. That moderator was probably persuaded, that the creation was yours. But only a property release can get the required confirmation.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Abambo

Community Expert

Thanks for the quick reply!

Let me make sure I understand this.

The moderator / reviewer was not convinced that these are my images and my IP - and I need to submit a property release to get past this? If that were the case - should I be doing this for every image I submit from now on? I completely understand the need to cover all the bases legally, but wondering why I am facing this pushback now after all the prior images I have submitted and subsequently were accepted without this.

As moderation is done by humans, within limits, you may expect different decisions, depending on many factors you can't influence. Yes, you should submit a property release for each of your creations. It may be, that they pass without, but you won't get IP related issues, when you do. Just sign as both, artist and owner, and you're done.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

サインアップ

ソーシャルログイン

コミュニティへログイン

ソーシャルログイン

ファイルをウイルススキャンする。

このファイルはダウンロードできません