Skip to main content
D
Di Agustina
Participant
May 11, 2021
解決済み

Imágenes rechazadas por cuestiones técnicas

  • May 11, 2021
  • 返信数 4.
  • 861 ビュー

Hola comunidad, soy nueva, estuve leyendo algunos comentarios para entender el porqué de que se rechazaran mis imágenes, si algunx puede dejarme su opinion me ayudaría mucho para aprender y tenerlo en cuenta desde el principio.

Les agradezco!

このトピックへの返信は締め切られました。
解決に役立った回答 Abambo

8402 - the right part is overexposed, the left part is underexposed. You have missing details. Due to the small sensor, your camera did aggressive processing to suppress noise and other artefacts and that comes at the cost of detail. Despite the processing you still have colour noise, very visible on the left side. And to conclude: because of the lady you need to submit a model release.

8405: Better light conditions, but also here missing detail:

8406: missing detail, missing contrast, colour noise.

 

I stop here as I feel that I will repeat myself. Anyhow, please avoid flooding us with massive copies of refused pictures. The defects are probably always the same and after the first three, you should be able to analyse the rest by yourself.

For this, you absolutely need to look at 100% and 200% at your pictures, or you won't see the defects.

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

返信数 4

ricardoj79910449
ricardoj79910449
Participant
October 21, 2021

No le des importancia, la mayoría de las veces rechazan fotos porque les sale de..., justo, de ahí abajo. Son unos impresentables, las están rechazando de forma sistemática, así les han bajado las ventas. Prácticamente todas las fotos que me rechazan son admitidas en otros portales, algunos bastante exigentes, y muchas veces las vendo, o sea que pasa de estos tipos y busca otros sitios para venderlas, te irá mucho mejor. Además, eso de que no te expliquen el porqué del rechazo mosquea bastante. En general, demuestran que son unos pobres ignorantes yanquis.

jacquelingphoto2017
Community Expert
jacquelingphoto2017Community Expert
Community Expert
May 12, 2021

Hi @Di Agustina ,

In addition to your color not smooth, there is also a white balance issue. For example the plats in fourth photo are not green. 

This shows the color noise on the cliff. You may also take a close look at the grass.

The fifth image also has a white balance issue.

Best wishes

JG

Photographer and Nutrition Author

 

Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Nancy OSheaCommunity Expert
Community Expert
May 11, 2021

Take a look at what other Stock contributors are doing in your keyword category. 

 

 

Ask yourself, what do those images have that mine don't?  What's missing?  Does my image check all the boxes?

  • Good lighting,
  • good color saturation,
  • proper focus,
  • pleasing composition,
  • good depth-of field,
  • proper white balance,
  • a story or message,
  • some wow factor (excitement). 

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
    Abambo
    Community Expert
    AbamboCommunity Expert解決！
    Community Expert
    May 11, 2021

    8402 - the right part is overexposed, the left part is underexposed. You have missing details. Due to the small sensor, your camera did aggressive processing to suppress noise and other artefacts and that comes at the cost of detail. Despite the processing you still have colour noise, very visible on the left side. And to conclude: because of the lady you need to submit a model release.

    8405: Better light conditions, but also here missing detail:

    8406: missing detail, missing contrast, colour noise.

     

    I stop here as I feel that I will repeat myself. Anyhow, please avoid flooding us with massive copies of refused pictures. The defects are probably always the same and after the first three, you should be able to analyse the rest by yourself.

    For this, you absolutely need to look at 100% and 200% at your pictures, or you won't see the defects.

    If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
    Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
    See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
    and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

    ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
      契約条件Accessibility statement
      Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices