Skip to main content
O
Olivi
Participating Frequently
November 17, 2023
解決済み

Lots of rejected AI images

  • November 17, 2023
  • 返信数 4.
  • 10329 ビュー

Hello everyone, colleagues.
I encountered a problem with many AI rejecting images and I don’t understand why, because sometimes images with worse quality are accepted, and images with better quality are rejected. Sometimes images are of the same quality, half are rejected, half are accepted.
I generate in Midjouney, increase in Topaz Gigapixel without applying the enhancement settings.
What do you think is wrong?
Here are some images for example:

    このトピックへの返信は締め切られました。
    解決に役立った回答 Jill_C

    In addition to the valid comments from @RALPH_L  and @daniellei4510 , I also see the following:

    zagr 8 - 354.jpg - the bright spot in the woman's hair looks like a mistake. The bokeh spots of light in the background don't make sense because there is no source.

    zagr 8 - 355.jpg - definitely should not have been accepted. The girl's teeth, ear and fingers are poorly formed. If a Buyer licenses this and then takes a closer look, they'll ask for a refund.

    zagr7 - 186.jpg - spot of light in her shoulder, the hand is oddly shaped and green.

    zagr7 - 190.jpg - pupils aren't round; inner corners of eyes very unrealistic.

     

    As you've learned, moderation, which is done by humans, can be inconsistent. I think they're under pressure to maintain a high volume of reviews, sometimes resulting in flawed images that are accepted. 

     

     

     

     

    返信数 4

    Olmyntay
    Olmyntay
    Known Participant
    November 19, 2023

    Some kind of terror of AI content just started, I encountered the same thing.
    And yes, the problem is that it is impossible to understand the essence of the problem!
    I think this is simple envy and downgrading of ratings, which ensures a decrease in sales. Since a lot of generative content began to reach the top, it is clear that photographers and artists who are also moderators suffer because of this.
    I realize this sounds like a conspiracy theory, but what are the options?
    All these comments about pointing out quality problems are completely unhelpful! Thus, problems can be found in anything! Three fingers on the hand are still clear, but otherwise there is no logic, and still no one answers the main question.

      Jill_C
      Community Expert
      Jill_CCommunity Expert
      Community Expert
      November 20, 2023

      If you believe that "All these comments about pointing out quality problems are completely unhelpful! " you are totally missing the point of the moderation process at Adobe Stock. Adobe wants to ensure the best experience for Buyers and provide assets of high quality. They have also provided this forum so that Contributors can gain some more clarity on the reasons for their rejected images. Many new Contributors do not properly understand the quality levels desired, nor are they experienced at evaluating their own images for compliance. The OP was apparently unaware of the technical issues in their submission, and has acknowledged the feedback. So how is that not helpful?

      Jill C., Forum Volunteer
        Jill_C
        Community Expert
        Jill_CCommunity Expert
        Community Expert
        November 20, 2023

        I don't know if you want to understand me!
        1. I really appreciate what you do here and how you help!
        2. But this is where you ignore the main question! Not only you personally, everyone who helps here ignores him!
        This question has been raised on this forum more than once, and no one has answered it!
        You simply take an unaccepted image and point to the reason why it was probably not accepted!
        But the question is not at all why a specific image was not accepted!
        Question: - why wasn’t this accepted, but another one that was of even worse quality was accepted?  

         Because, for example, even in the most striking case where there are three fingers in the image, there will not just be accepted images with three fingers, there will be images with three fingers that are even in the top sales and recommendations!
        So it's not about quality that they want to improve; if they wanted to improve, there would be clear and understandable criteria for rejection! And not so that two works with three fingers were rejected, but one was still accepted! 
          


        I really am trying to understand you, but your message is a bit garbled. When presented with a rejected image, the Contributors here will point out the flaws for which we think it was rejected. Sometimes, though not very often, we conclude that the Moderators erred and should have accepted the image.  We cannot comment on images already in the database that are of poorer quality than the image for which feedback was requested. That's not the purpose of this forum. And the fact that poor quality images have made it into the database does not mean that more poor quality images should be accepted...

         

        As stated here frequently, Moderators are human, and there can be inconsistencies in their decisions. 

        Jill C., Forum Volunteer
          Jill_C
          Community Expert
          Jill_CCommunity Expert解決！
          Community Expert
          November 17, 2023

          In addition to the valid comments from @RALPH_L  and @daniellei4510 , I also see the following:

          zagr 8 - 354.jpg - the bright spot in the woman's hair looks like a mistake. The bokeh spots of light in the background don't make sense because there is no source.

          zagr 8 - 355.jpg - definitely should not have been accepted. The girl's teeth, ear and fingers are poorly formed. If a Buyer licenses this and then takes a closer look, they'll ask for a refund.

          zagr7 - 186.jpg - spot of light in her shoulder, the hand is oddly shaped and green.

          zagr7 - 190.jpg - pupils aren't round; inner corners of eyes very unrealistic.

           

          As you've learned, moderation, which is done by humans, can be inconsistent. I think they're under pressure to maintain a high volume of reviews, sometimes resulting in flawed images that are accepted. 

           

           

           

           

          Jill C., Forum Volunteer
            O
            Olivi作成者
            Participating Frequently
            November 17, 2023

            Thank you very much for your opinion, I will try to improve the quality through retouching

              daniellei4510
              Community Expert
              daniellei4510Community Expert
              Community Expert
              November 17, 2023

              zagr7 - 186
              There's something about the hand that I can't quite put my finger on (no pun intended). Is the middle finger abnormally long? The decorative hat/mask: jewel-studded costumes raise problems when it comes to AI. All of the jewels are misshapen or have random facets, while some seem a cross between a jewel and decorative cloth.

              zagr 8 - 355
              Although accepted, it should have been rejected. Look at the teeth at 200%. The eyes lack detail and there are fly-away hairs that could be removed.

              zagr - 354
              Same deal with the teeth and eyes. The woman's earring adds nothing and could have been removed. The decoration on the girl's head lacks distinct ball shapes and in spots look like a mass of jelly.|

              zagr7 - 190
              This should have been rejected as well. This is one of those Midjourney hybrids that are part photorealistic and part illustration. The pupils and lips, for example, are far from photorealistic.

              Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
                O
                Olivi作成者
                Participating Frequently
                November 17, 2023

                Thank you very much for your opinion, I will try to improve the quality

                Abambo
                Community Expert
                AbamboCommunity Expert
                Community Expert
                November 19, 2023

                355 needs to be deleted, even though it got an initial approval. If you have many of such assets and Adobe reviews your account, your account could be suspended.

                 

                You will need to be much more critical of your own pictures. Hoping that the moderator does not see the errors is not a good strategy. That could backfire.

                 

                ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
                  RALPH_L
                  Community Expert
                  RALPH_LCommunity Expert
                  Community Expert
                  November 17, 2023

                  Spend less time creating images and more time editing them.

                  Just a quick glance at number 354 and I see:

                  --the image is too soft and not in focus.

                  --the berries in the girls hair are melted together.

                  --the lady has an orange spot in her hair.

                  --her left eye (the bag underneath) does not match the right eye.

                  -- her ear ring is formed wrong.

                  --her ring is formed wrong.

                  --the finger nail on her pointing finger is wrong.

                  --the bridge of her glasses is formed wrong.

                  Should I keep looking?

                  Seriously, don't waste your time sending bad images. AI is a new frontier, but it does not take away the need to review and edit.

                    O
                    Olivi作成者
                    Participating Frequently
                    November 17, 2023

                    Thank you very much for your opinion, I will try to improve the quality 

                    M
                    MindGems
                    Known Participant
                    November 20, 2023

                    Basically if anything is Off in the image, it there are tell tail signs of Ai it wont be accepted. Plus you do yourself a diservice submitting bad content, I'm quite sure the more refusals the lower your standing and we all suffer with large volumes of crap waiting for reviews.

                    契約条件Accessibility statement
                    Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices