Cześć. Ostatnio kilka zdjęć, które przesłałam zostało odrzuconych z powodu słabej jakości. Proszę o opinie co było nie tak, czego unikać w przyszłości?
Your first is underexposed as shown by the histogram:
You also have visible noise in the picture.
Your second has similar issues with exposure and noise. In addition, you desaturated the background. As @Ricky336 said, Adobe stock does not appreciate that.
Your third is also underexposed, and the DOF is too narrow.
Your fourth is again very noisy. I think it's missing contrasts. In addition, you missed the focus on the flower heart.
ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Bardzo dziękuję za konkretne wskazówki. Zastanawia mnie "desaturacja tła" stwierdzona na 2 zdjęciu. Poprawiłam to zdjęcie jedynie kadrując i zmniejszając ekspozycję. Tło było nie ruszane, wygląd zawdzięcza zastosowaniu nietypowego obiektywu (helios M44). Będę tego unikać.
It may well be, that reducing the exposure is creating the desaturation effect. Reducing the exposure on a white background creates a gray background, and that's the same optical effect than desaturating the background.
ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Although the photos you have submitted are actually quite good, unfortunately, they are not for stock. I think the main reason is the focus. although you intended to have a shallow DOF, again for stock it isn't suitable (generally speaking).
Also, in the second photo, don't do selective colouring if intended for stock! I think this is the main reason.
I would also like to point out that there are gazillions of flower photos in the stock database. They have been done to death; you will be better off putting your attention to something that isn't heavily represented!
When submitting photos for stock you have to think about their commercial use!