Skip to main content
T
timmreiner_mediadesign
Participant
January 18, 2023
解決済み

Want to lern the reject reasons of my photography

  • January 18, 2023
  • 返信数 3.
  • 293 ビュー

Hello all,

I would like to offer some of my photos on adobe stock and have only received rejections on my images so far.
Maybe you can help me to improve my work.

The pictures are mostly atmospheric, dark and with little depth of field - is that always a criterion for exclusion?

Are the pictures generally too noisy?

 

このトピックへの返信は締め切られました。
解決に役立った回答 Test Screen Name

You need an IP release for any recognisable product. That is, the maker or designer would recognise this as their design. Picture#2 is a good example of this. Brand names are different - they are not allowed in normal submissions at all, not even with a release, I think. Picture#1 is a good example of this.

 

Remember your photos may be used in adverts to sell anything, even rival products, and you must confirm you have all the rights to do that. Yet, if the picture of Kentucky Highway Honey was used to advertise Kentucky Road Super, with bad references to the Kentucky Highway Honey, we can see lawyers getting involved. Nobody wants that.

返信数 3

Ricky336
Community Expert
Ricky336Community Expert
Community Expert
January 18, 2023

Hello,

Start with this:

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html

 

    Jill_C
    Community Expert
    Jill_CCommunity Expert
    Community Expert
    January 18, 2023

    1. Noise is the primary reason for rejection, though composition is also not good. Additionally you would have needed to submit a product release because of the label in the bottle.

    2. Underexposed, blown highlight, not well composed 

    3.noise and chromatic aberration. 

    Read all of the Adobe stock help pages before proceeding in order to improve your chances of acceptance.

     

    Jill C., Forum Volunteer
    RALPH_L
    Community Expert
    RALPH_LCommunity Expert
    Community Expert
    January 18, 2023

    Yes the photos are all too dark.

    The 1st photo is too noisy and needs an IP release.

    The 2nd photo has aberation in the background and needs an IP release.

    The 3rd photo has overexposed highlights.

    T
    timmreiner_mediadesign作成者
    Participant
    January 18, 2023

    Hi Ralph, 
    thanks for your quick response. Did I also need an IP release for products without brand names on it?

    1st one... yes think you are right

    2nd... ok, but do you think after fixing it is a chance for the picture?

    3rd... Okay, but this is a sparkler, how can I photograph without overexposed lights? all the lights on a firework are overexposed, aren't they?

    thanks a lot for you helt

    T
    Test Screen Name解決！
    Legend
    January 18, 2023

    You need an IP release for any recognisable product. That is, the maker or designer would recognise this as their design. Picture#2 is a good example of this. Brand names are different - they are not allowed in normal submissions at all, not even with a release, I think. Picture#1 is a good example of this.

     

    Remember your photos may be used in adverts to sell anything, even rival products, and you must confirm you have all the rights to do that. Yet, if the picture of Kentucky Highway Honey was used to advertise Kentucky Road Super, with bad references to the Kentucky Highway Honey, we can see lawyers getting involved. Nobody wants that.

      契約条件Accessibility statement
      Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices