Feature Requests

Because the latest distiller settings are tougher and error frequently, InDesign users need a way to easily export documents as print spreads (imposed from reader spreads) from the “print booklet” option. Currently I can either print to my home printer or print to postscript, but not print to pdf. (There is no InDesign category for Feature Requests, so if you’re going to remove this, please create a category I can post it to.)

call it pre roll and post roll

In addition to numeric data, we work with a lot of text strings as well. It would be helpful, especially when analyzing our search pages and results, to be able to sort breakdowns, freeform tables, etc. A-Z or Z-A

My academic email is  REMOVED IN THIS PUBLIC FORUMI used it to log in, im sure of it, but it doesn't open any feature yet my University is subscribed. 

私は Adobe Creative Cloud の正規ユーザーとして、 Illustrator / Photoshop / Acrobat を業務で日常的に使用しています。その中で、 OS の入力イベント差・IME の挙動差・Adobe 製品ごとの入力処理の違いが 多言語入力の安定性に影響している現象を継続的に観察しています。これは個別製品の問題ではなく、 Creative Cloud 全体の入力パイプラインに関わる構造的な揺らぎと考えています。特に、 Firefly Prompt テキスト入力 多言語ワークフロー 製品間の一貫した入力体験 に影響が出る可能性があります。 業務の中でこの領域について独自に調査を進めており、 いくつかの再現条件や共通点も見えてきていますが、 ここでは詳細には触れません。必要であれば、観察した現象の詳細や、 どのような条件で揺らぎが発生するかについて共有できます。

Here's my idea: Fix the bugs in your current software before spending time and MY money creating new AI crap nobody wants.

​@Andrew Albert could you please assist in activating the linkedin premium offer as I am getting an error when redeeming .Offer unavailable"You do not meet the eligibility requirements for this offer. Please contact customer support for more assistance."

I would humbly suggest adding MEDICAL and UNDERWATER as categories. Nothing comes close to either.I have a lot of medical images, and I am afraid they won’t be found

Contextual Tool Bar Shortcut Key. Allow for the Contextual Tool Bar to hide and reveal with a keyboard shortcut! 

If Adobe are going to put something as unwanted as an “AI” feature to sift through though search criteria then wouldn’t it be a really, really go idea to use the filters (that are already activated) to narrow down the scope of responses?ie don’t look for a Photoshop question in Indesignor an Illustrator question in with Firefly Otherwise voting for it’s removal is the way to go:   

I’m not liking these new changes to the Adobe community forums. In particular there doesn’t appear to be a way of changing the theme when adding code:This is my code;Isn't it lovely;What lovely code.hello world!Javascript as well as the other languages appear to be a Dark theme. Which is all find and dandy if you are viewing everything else on a dark theme. Some of us who suffer from palinopsia when looking at high contrast images really don’t need this. At least give us an option or some semblance of control to have everything as light or dark theme.Otherwise these forums are a literal (and actual) headache.

When I scroll down to see the most recent questions, there is absolutely no indication of what forum I am using. See screen capture. Even the tab (red arrow) in my web browser doesn’t say what forum it is. Nowhere does it say “Lightroom Classic”, those words do not appear anywhere. Please modify the appearance of the forum to say “Lightroom Classic” somewhere below the top of the page so when I scroll down I can still determine what forum I am in; perhaps the words “Lightroom Classic” could appear next to “Questions” under the poster’s name. If I click on a post in a forum, and the post opens and I scroll down to the replies, similarly there are no words on the screen to tell me what forum I am in. This needs to be fixed as well.

As it stands the edit behaviour of the parametric EQ effect (and to my knowledge all audio effects within audio track mixer) is not as I’d expect - this could potentially be a bug unless intentional for whatever reason? It sometimes appears to only register as an edit in the activity log once playback to paused for instance.Ideally each edit made, specifically on a parametric EQ for a track should be logged, giving the user the ability to undo and redo each edit.

Adobe has replaced the community interface with a very very different product. Adobe has apparently failed to provide instructions on using the new community. Please create and post such documentation. For an example, this old post: 

Hierdurch kann schnell gesehen wierden, ob die Zuordnung der User richtig ist, bzw. kann nach Rollen dann die Userliste sortiert werden.

Please create and post documentation as to the new community interface status, and timeline of future modifications and fixes. Also include bug status. Let the community know what is occurring, what is known as issues, what is being fixed, and what is being changed/added, with timelines.  Also, perhaps in the posting, include community input into a centralized post. 

In the "Related conversations" we see the topics with the same keyword, but from other forums. To me they aren't related at all (in most cases). I'd like to see only the topics of the same forum. 

When logged into a banned community account, it's impossible to view any page on the forums. Even though these pages are publicly available when logged out. As it's also impossible to log out of said banned account without clearing all browsing data from browser profile this can be quite frustrating.  Would be great if banned users could view pages and simply be banned from contributing. Thanks for your time!

If part of posting any idea included a field for identifying "what problem or problems is your idea solving?" then Adobe could use AI to identify ideas which are attempting to solve the same problem. This would allow Adobe to quantify which problems are most common (as opposed to only seeing which ideas are popular), and allow users to filter for ideas that are trying to solve specific problems, etc.

I've been an Adobe user for decades, and until a few weeks ago have never bothered to look at or post anything within the "Adobe Community". Nothing against it, just haven't needed it and never wanted to take the extra time to go into yet another app to write up a note like this. I suspect this is true of many "power users" or people who work on large teams where questions can be more easily answered by humans. Especially these days, when it's much more reliable to simply ask chatGPT. The biggest barrier for me personally has been that I didn’t want to leave the UX (Illustrator, Photoshop, etc) to open up "yet another" tab/app. Go to a browser, click a bunch more buttons, etc. Instead of making the user drill down to find an answer, why not bring the answer to them? Why not provide support seamlessly within the app? Leverage AI to supply answers or tell users "we'll get back to you soon with an answer!" while their comment gets routed to Adobe's CRM. AI can also ask for clari

Need one for those "armchair commentors" who don't add to the conversation with their mornic replies that do not add to the solve what so ever!

It's very annoying to find posters posting replies and then automatically marking their reply the correct one. This is particularly silly because once a comment is marked "correct", the thread is labeled SOLVED. Even if the OP still has the problem. This creates an incentive for Adobe Employees to mark problems solved giving the impression that there are fewer outstanding issues AND for  experts to rack up their percent of problems SOLVED. So any one can post anything and then say they solved the problem, which will then bring people in using that solution. This can lead to:People trying to fix problems with solutions that don't work.That in turn leads to more posts on the same problem as people are going to start a new post without the alleged solutionSome people may be helped by the proposed solution. However this will lead to the thread being overwhelmed by responses about that solution. Unfortunately, this means the original poster's problem will be buried!Ideally, only t

I got a shiny new button to explore the new communities! Yaa-...Oh.Oh. Okay, so, it's cool to have some funny new buttons, but of the 5, 2 were just AI ads, several were just ai slop art on buttons, 4 of them led to a page that introduced you to AI and... this was the only one that did none of it... and this forum was 3 pages down. So I guess adobe is intent on just shoving anyone who doesn't consume AI in the corner in an attempt to coddle the ones who do and convince them they're very important and absolutely embraced by corporate managers the community. Consider this my complaint. It's bad. No I won't elaborate. You probably had a thinktank where some think was wrongthink about it.

More & more websites are using newer WebP and AVIF file types.  But not Adobe. WebP and AVIF offer better picture quality & file compression than JPG, PNG and GIF. Most browsers support them: https://caniuse.com/webp https://caniuse.com/avif   This platform still does not allow embedded WebP or AVIF files.  When can we expect that to change?      

I don't see any use of the Top reply feature.Firstly, bots can "promote" any random comment (and often do). Secondly, it just increases the length of the page that needs to be scrolled and draws unnecessary attention from the topics themselves.