Skip to main content

Filter by idea status

10000+ Ideas

Back to top of the list
iaa1Known Participant

Crash Repair Option to QuitOpen for Voting

Currently when recovering from a Crash four options are presented.Can we have an option to Quit?Currently under MacOS there is no ability to Quit except do a force quit.   [Moved by moderator to the Ideas sub-forum]  

0
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
C�sar_Cot�n

Specify output resolutionOpen for Voting

Solicito que habiliten la capacidad de definir la resolución de las imágenes generadas ó al menos, se conserve la resolución de las imágenes originales (cuando son editadas con la IA).

1
N8.
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
Gauher_Jaan3978Participating Frequently

Idea: Reassessing Generative Credit Costs for Firefly Video to Drive AdoptionOpen for Voting

This post is focused on a crucial area for future improvement: the Generative Credit cost model for Firefly Video. My primary goal is to provide candid, constructive feedback that I believe will dramatically increase user adoption and satisfaction with this new feature. First, I want to express my genuine appreciation. The work you are doing is absolutely groundbreaking. The seamless integration of features like Generative Fill into Photoshop and the artistic quality of your image models has fundamentally changed my creative workflow for the better. As an enthusiastic and appreciative Creative Cloud subscriber, I genuinely root for the success of every new innovation you launch. The Value Proposition Challenge: I currently have a subscription tier that provides 4,000 Generative Credits per month. Upon the conclusion of the free promotional period for the video model, I noted the following cost structure: The cost for generating a 5-second, 1080p video clip using model "Adobe Firefly Image 5" is 500 Generative Credits.The Real-World Cost of "Trial and Error" While I understand that generative video is computationally demanding, the current pricing model assumes a high success rate that does not yet exist:The Reality of Retries: From my personal experience, achieving a desired, usable result is rarely a "one-shot" process. In my own testing, I found I often needed 18 to 22 retries to get a single satisfactory clip.The Multiplier Effect: Because every attempt costs 500 credits—regardless of quality—the effective cost for one usable 5-second video can skyrocket to 10,000 credits or more. This makes the feature financially prohibitive for experimentation. Comparison to Market Alternatives: in my testing of other commercially available models (such as Google’s Veo 3.1), I observed a significantly higher efficiency rate:Efficiency: I was often able to achieve a production-ready 8-second clip (1080p) within just 1 to 3 attempts only.Cost: The credit consumption for these successful generations was 400 credits - that is less than the cost of a shorter Firefly clip. The disparity in both cost and success rate makes it difficult to justify using the Firefly model for daily workflows when high-quality alternatives are available at a fraction of the price. The Commercial Indemnity Factor: I recognize that the higher pricing may be tied to the valuable promise of commercial indemnity (legal protection). However, for a large segment of the community—particularly those of us creating content for social platforms like Instagram—this "premium" protection is often not a priority.Social Media Reality: Platforms like Instagram often demonstrate a low concern for copyrighted content when it is clearly made for "fun", "storytelling", and is non-commercial. The primary legal risk arises when a brand attempts to take a piece of UGC and use it in a large-scale public or commercial campaign.Limited Scope: Furthermore, even for commercial users, indemnity is not a universal shield against claims based on explicit, infringing user-supplied prompts. For example, if a generation strongly resembles a famous, protected character like Pikachu, the risk of a legal attack from the IP holder remains regardless of Adobe's indemnity.Paying a substantial premium for a "safety" feature that many of us do not need (or that doesn't fully apply to our specific use caseexample) somewhat feels like a mismatch for the average Creative Cloud user, especially when factoring in the cost of high failure rates. My Suggestion: I strongly suggest reassessing the credit consumption rate for video generation.Lowering the cost (or offering a low-cost "preview" mode) would encourage users to experiment more freely. This would not only drive adoption but also provide your team with the massive volume of user feedback needed to refine the model and close the gap with competitors. I personally really enjoyed this promotion period. We self taught how to work with AI models, and created many videos that I personally find very appealing. For example, take a look at this IG video. Thank you for listening to your community.Respectfully,CQ

2
Scott-name-already-in-use
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
Reem29254214ad3pParticipant

It's so silly that you can't make a dashed line in the entire programOpen for Voting

title

1
JonesVid
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
bbbigelow
bbbigelowInspiring

Link Media window: allow "Match File Properties" to influence "display exact name" in searchOpen for Voting

In an Offfline workflow it's common to edit with low file size proxies of a diferent file type, then for finishing reconnect to the camera originals. Premiere is able to do this with one issue: In the Link Media window, when you seach for a file with "display exact name" checked, it will not find the file if the file extension is diferent. So... you have to navigate to the file yourself, select it, and premiere will reconnect to the file and it will also "relinik other automatically" however only those files in the same bin. This is the issue. If you have a lot of footage nested in bins per card which are also in bins per shoot day, you have to reconnect each bin individually. In contrast, if the file name and extension is the same, you can simply search the top level folder and premiere will find the file, then when it attempts to "relink other automatically", it will successfully relink all your media because it is looking from the root folder of all your footage. But because the extension is not the same and I can't find my camera media in the search, I have to do each bin at a time (can be very time consuming) Possible to add a toggle in the UI which is something like "ignore file extension" when searching for a file with the "exact" same name?

0
bbbigelow
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
nitaimedia

Last frame save for scene extensions on FireflyOpen for Voting

How about a button or menu option to save the last frame of a generated video on Firefly, to then use as the first frame, when extending a scene?

1
Kartika Rawat
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
Rizum
RizumKnown Participant

Change background color in uv viewport?Under Review

When drawing in 2D view the background color is too dark, is there anyway to change the background color.

2
Rizum
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
JR Boulay
Community Expert
JR BoulayCommunity Expert

Generative Fill and GrayscaleOpen for Voting

Hello, Rather than receiving a message asking me to convert the Grayscale image to RGB, Lab or CMYK before using Generative Fill, I would prefer the mode change to be automatic and for the message to tell me that my image has just been converted to RGB and that I am free to convert it to another colour mode. Thank you.  

4
Stephen Marsh
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
kellykrazychic
kellykrazychicParticipant

Pause deletion should have a "reduce to" duration setting, leaving a breath between removed pausesOpen for Voting

Problem: When using the pause filter and deleting silences, Premiere Pro deletes the WHOLE pause, leading to a very unnatural flow of speech between sentences. Fix: Include a "reduce to" duration feature that doesn't delete the whole pause, but leaves a specified length of pause (for example, reducing a 2-second pause to 0.5 seconds instead of the way it reduces it to 0.0 seconds now) The trim multiple clips feature to add frames back is a terrible workaround for two reasons: 1) if there are already cuts in the sequence, you can't isolate the deleted pauses.  2) There's no control to leave frames based on the amount of space deleted.   For example, if I find all pauses that are 5 seconds or more, I want to leave 1 second of pause.  Then, to find all pauses 2 seconds or more, i want to reduce those down to 0.5 seconds. I'm frustrated that with the number of complaints about the delete pauses feature leading to unnatural speach flow that this wasn't fixed by now. It takes way too much work manually adding back breathing room between 100's of deleted pauses with the way the feature works now. 

1
Stan Jones
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
vin_00

IA générative rendus haute définitionOpen for Voting

• La définition des rendus sont exécrables.• L'interface permettait hier l'usage de quatre images de référence (ce qui était déjà très limité), désormais il n'y en a plus qu'une seule ce qui est disqualifiant.• Les formats d'image sont devenus très limités aussi. Hier j'avais accès à des formats allant du 21:9, 16:9, 3:4 etc. en vertical et en horizontal. Ces formats sont désomais limités et certains ne sont plus disponibles.• Le plafond de la llimite de caractères du prompt devrait être bien plus élevé.• Un champ pour le prompt négatif en complément du prompt de base serait bienvenu.• la censure extrème est disqualifiante. Surtout pour un logiciel payant. La censure devrait disparaitre lorsque l'utilisateur paye. La vie réelle est parfois violente. Difficile voire impossible de réaliser des images scientifiques et médicales. Des hybridation techno-organiques, des délires surréalistes. Cela est très disqualifiant également.• Si vous tenez absolument à faire de l'IA générative tous publics (incluant les enfants et les bisounours) alors faites donc une autre application tierce destinée à ce genre de public mineur, qui ne paye pas en général pour l'usage d'IA génératives.• Il serait une bonne idée de pouvoir mettre des images de éférences pour les types de rendus, de lumières, d'angles de vue, etc. Pour ces paramètres en particulier, une voire deux images de référence suffiraient.J'ai d'autres suggestions mais celles-ci sont les principales, les plus intéressantes, les plus concrètes et les plus urgentes selon moi.Merci pour tout.

1
N8.
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
NaisenbergNew Member

P: Add batch update for multiple AI masks.Open for Voting

It would be great to have an option to update the AI masks of multiple images when selecting them. Right now, you need to do it for every image individually, which can be a tedious task.

0
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
D0ugiefreshParticipating Frequently

P: Customize UIOpen for Voting

I was very disappointed when I started work today as I opened up LR Mobile (following the newest 4.3.2 update) and discovered that once again I have to change my entire workflow. As a working professional who uses my iPhone to be my Lightroom main controller in front of a laptop (which one for finer adjustments and things mobile can't do), I used to be able to fly through my work. Now, and increasingly so with every update, I have to relearn my workflow with the added frustration of multiple new actions to complete simple tasks.   For example, if I wanted to auto-adjust the cropping, all I had to do was go to the geometry tab and hit a well-placed button up top. Now, I have to go to geometry and select a separate sub tab that of course isn't defaulted because more amateurish social media options have been made the initial landing under Geometry. More actions, spread farther apart on the UI, and it makes everything I do once again take longer. And the worst part? Every single time I go back I have to do the same thing as the app refuses to remember what I used on my last action.  I'm now at the point where y'all are literally constantly hurting my profitability. And all in the name of features that don't benefit us professionals who pay the lion share of the subscription fees Adobe collects. I can totally respect the need for businesses to attract new users. But this is repeatedly done to attract casual users at the expense of paying power users. Something has to give or I'm just going to move to something cheaper. The only reason I haven't so far is because the idea of hurting my own profitability by startling my a new system all over from scratch seemed unwise. Less and less so now with every LR update.  What I want out of this, as I've asked for in these forums, to Adobe support staff, and on social media, is for Adobe to allow us to customize our UI layout the way that works best for us. Nothing Adobe does (or ever will do) to pretend that we're all going to start posting all of our social media stuff through the LR app is futile and not what I'm paying y'all $60/mo. for. That's awesome that y'all want to continually add new features. But please stop assuming that's what most of us want or need and forcing those additions into the UI at the expense of our profitability. LET US CUSTOMIZE OUR TABS. Please. 

1
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
real_5081Known Participant

Gradient along strokeOpen for Voting

Can we have the ability to have the gradient follow the path of the stroke? The current gradient stroke is mediocre at best.  Feels like a basic thing to include tbh.  

0
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
david@harveywetdog
david@harveywetdogInspiring

Firefly voices are American and not BritishOpen for Voting

When will we get proper British voices with Firefly?

2
david@harveywetdog
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
nilsohman
nilsohmanKnown Participant

P: A shortcut to create a virtual copy of an image into another collectionOpen for Voting

I use virtual copies and collections exensively when I'm working with projects. I often to through images in several collections and folders looking for images in a new project. And I want to create new virtual copies of found images for the new project.   I start a new project by creating a collection and set it as the target collection. I then start looking for images for the project in different folders and collections and use the shortcut B to have them appear in the project collection. After the "hunt" I mark all images in the project collection and create virtual copies of all images (Shift-V). With alla virtual copies still marked in the Metadata pane I then give them a copy-name (usually the same as the name of the projectfolder). Then I go to Edit/Invert Selection and then I remove those from the collection. I now have a collection with virtual copies unique for this project. This way I don't risk to alter images that are used in other projects.   To make this process easier I would like a new Shortcut (Ctrl-B) that creates a virtual copy of a selected image in the target collection. The copy name should be the name of the target colletion.

2
nilsohman
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
Thales Magno
Thales MagnoParticipating Frequently

Improve Portugese supportOpen for Voting

faz um esforco pra sua ferramenta aprender portugues

1
N8.
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
Jason34766293123uParticipant

Proposal for a Unified Creative Engine: Integrating After Effects Tools Directly into Premiere ProOpen for Voting

I have used Adobe for over 12 years and its been great. I work with a team of editors and our needs have changed over time and we need a better solution then what adobe is currently offering. I would switch to some thing else if i could right now but can not. I am stuck with adobe for now so i am writing this hoping it will spark some kind of change. The Problem: Currently, the "round-trip" workflow between Premiere Pro and After Effects via Dynamic Link is becoming a significant bottleneck for modern creators. While Dynamic Link was revolutionary years ago, the requirement to manage separate project files, deal with "Media Offline" link breaks, and wait for background render engines to initialize is no longer competitive. In an era where "all-in-one" ecosystems are becoming the standard, the friction of switching between two heavy applications is a major pain point.The Solution: I am proposing a Unified Workflow. Instead of After Effects being a separate application that requires a separate save file, Adobe should integrate the After Effects compositing engine as a dedicated "Compositing Workspace" or "Page" within Premiere Pro—similar to how the Lumetri Color panel integrated SpeedGrade.Why This is Crucial for Adobe’s Future:Project Management: Eliminating the need for separate .aep files would drastically reduce file bloat and the risk of broken links. Everything should live within one project container.User Retention: Many long-time Adobe users are currently migrating to competitors (like DaVinci Resolve) specifically because the "single-software" workflow is faster and more stable. By unifying these tools, Adobe would remove the primary reason users are leaving the ecosystem.Performance: A unified engine would allow for shared RAM previewing and smarter caching, ending the "waiting for link" lag that currently disrupts the creative flow.Conclusion: Adobe has the best motion graphics and editing tools on the market, but they are currently trapped in silos. By listening to the community and unifying these programs, you aren't just adding a feature—you are modernizing the entire post-production philosophy. We want to stay with Adobe, but we need a workflow that keeps up with the speed of modern content creation.

3
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
Peru Bob
Community Expert
Peru BobCommunity Expert

Open two instances of Premiere ProOpen for Voting

Currently, opening two projects will allow sequences from both projects to be in the same timeline panel. This can cause confusion when editing and saving projects.   It would be nice if instead of a single instance of Premiere Pro being open, opening a second project would result in a completely independent launching of another instance of Premiere Pro., similar to opening two different programs. Each project would be managed as if it were the only project open.

2
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
mikeymick
mikeymickParticipant

Next image button please...Open for Voting

Would it be possible to include a next image button in Firefly.In Firefly, when you generate 4 images and you open one of the images in full could we have the next image button back please? At present you have to go back to the four images and click on the next one, it's quite time consuming when you could just add a button that opens the next image without having to go back to the four images.

1
Kartika Rawat
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
alex_ivanoff0182

add more TokenOpen for Voting

Hello, Adobe Firefly team!I actively use your service, I use the NANO BANANA PRO model for operational work. Faced with a critical problem: The current token limit is sorely lacking for professional tasks.The main difficulty is the inability to insert a structured prompt in JSON format. When I try to set detailed parameters (composition, style for each object, color scheme), even a compact JSON file does not fit in the input field. The NANO BANANA PRO model, where accuracy and the ability to quickly repeat queries are often needed, this limitation completely blocks efficient operation.I either have to split one idea into a dozen simplified queries, or abandon fine-tuning, which greatly reduces the quality of the final image.Request: Please urgently consider increasing the character limit (tokens) in the prompt input field. This is necessary for:Using structured data (JSON).Improve the accuracy and reproducibility of the results for all users.Thanks for your attention! I hope for a speedy improvement.Yours sincerely,Alex

2
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
rossisreality

Apply Mask to Motion RequestOpen for Voting

Hi, I've been loving the ai masking feature! It's great how you can apply the mask tracking to the opacity effect channel. However, I'm wondering if it's possible to add the same feature, allowing you to add mask key frames to the motion effect channel? It would be a huge benefit for reformatting landscape videos to vertical without having to manually keyframe. I know there is an auto-reframe sequence option, but it rarely works when I have an object moving around the frame. So, I feel using the auto mask feature would give a much more accurate motion tracking option if possible.  Quick note, when I first tested the object mask tool, it actually did track the subject and keep them in frame. Although it only worked the first time I tried it, and hasn't worked since.  If there's an option or effect I'm overlooking, please do let me know! Thanks a million!

0
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
Donovan299290298zji

Zoom wheel on timeline is choppy not laggy!Open for Voting

When i zoom in and out of the timeline or even scroll or move my timeline it tends to be choppe on every mouse movement and every scroll, it doesnt just frame by frame zoom in/out or smoothly moves let or right. its almost like its in 30fps instad of my screens refresh rate of 144hz. this has always been the case in premerire pro on windows, but not on mac, I know that windows uses every scroll whell movement as a click but cmon! we can do better! make sure it does it smoothly. also i am not talking about teh magnet attching thing where the chopped video connect tot eh other one im saying when you move anything its choppy and looks framd capped, but when you move the scroll bar at the bottom of the timeline or expand it, its smooth! we can so make a way to make this zoom when you only use the mouse to zoom in and out, drag files or videos, ect

0
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
wainer_2551

sincronizaçao de video e audio em arquivos cortados (video)Open for Voting

Realizo trabalho de ediçao com varias cameras, onde sincronizo as trilhas, naturalmente sendo seguidos pelos videos, apos sincronizaçao, boqueio as trilhas de audio e começo a cortar somente os videos, ficando portanto as camadas de video com varios cortes. normalmente um trecho do video fica vinculado a trilha de audio, mas vejo que seria interessante, uma forma de que todos os cortes, continuassem a ficar vinculados ao audio de forma que a cada trecho, fosse informado, como ja acontece, a quantidade de frames que esta alem ou aquem do audio, mostrando o quanto esta fora de sincronia. Hoje para verificar se saiu de sincronia (o video) preciso ficar conectando/vinculando cada trecho cortado com o audio oque me gera mais trabalho. se todos os trechos de video, mesmo que cortados, pudessem mostrar em frames o quanto estao fora, ficaria muito mais facil. Esta poderia ser uma opçao de ligar ou desligar a sincronia de todos os videos cortados com a trilha de audio...  nao sei se me fiz entender bem ...

1
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
kendallmck

P: A better way to rotate photosOpen for Voting

It used to be pretty easy to rotate your photos, but the new update changed it so the button that used to rotate photos quickly only rotates the aspect ratio. To rotate the actual photo now, you have to tap to bring up a menu, then tap rotate, and then the menu goes away so you have to tap to bring it up again for each rotation. It doubles the taps it takes to rotate photos and adds a lot of time to my workflow. This seems like a very basic function that lots of people need to be able to use quickly and easily, and I hope they can find a way to make it more accessible. 

1
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
Marcos_Love9209

Motion Blur Feature in Timewarp (BRING IT BACK!!!!)Open for Voting

Timewarp used to have motion blur and it actually worked well. Clean, natural blur that matched optical flow and didn’t need plugins.Now it’s gone and there’s no real replacement in Premiere. CC force motion blur is the closest thing to it but that means you need to create a dynamic link everytime you want to use it. Everything else is slower or looks worse.Not sure why it was removed. Would be good to have it back, even as an optional toggle.  

8
R Neil Haugen
Forum|Forum|8 months ago
Show more posts

Filter by product

  • All products
Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices