Build better products with our product team
First, I want to say that the recent addition of Nano Banana is fantastic, it's exciting to see how Photoshop keeps evolving. From here, the only way is forward.I’d like to suggest something that could make Photoshop even more powerful and intuitive: enabling voice commands. Similar to how modern language models allow natural voice interaction, Photoshop could integrate a small microphone icon within the interface, giving users the option to speak commands instead of typing or navigating menus.This could open up a new level of accessibility and workflow efficiency, especially for creative professionals who often have their hands full while working.
Please add this functionality throughout the app: Right click on a color swatch inside any effect or panel, to bring up a context menu with Copy and Paste possibillities. The eyedropper is not always the best solution when copy colors from e.g. one Comp to another.
I get Adobe changed to this annual release cycle when it moved to a subscription model and they wanted to make it seem like we're getting our money's worth - but we've accepted that the subscription model is here to stay, so we don't need this ridiculous rushed out cycle any more. It's not helping anyone or anything, it's actually a hinderance and I'm actually quite sick of being a beta tester for a product I pay for annually. Let's go back to the days of stable software and features that have the kins worked out before release. Thanks
Lightroom Mobile for iOS should support background sync. Currently, the app only syncs when opened but stops when switching to another iOS app or the display starts to sleep. This makes the workflow less than optimised and required unnecessary user attention. Please consider implementing this functionality.
Hello Adobe Team,I’m writing to kindly suggest an improvement to the "Flip Horizontal" function in Photoshop, particularly when working with documents that contain a large number of layers.In other software such as PaintTool SAI 2, this action performs almost instantly, even with 500 or more layers. Given Adobe’s leading position in creative software, I believe Photoshop has the potential to achieve similar efficiency.Would it be possible to optimize the "Flip Horizontal" feature in a future update, so it performs more smoothly when many layers are present?Thank you for your time and consideration.
I would like to see the technology for generative extend be used for a generative fill - where you can have two clips on the timeline, that you have cut out a section of the speaker talking, where normally you could use a morph cut or b-roll, but generative fill would use the last and first frames as referance, and create video to seamlessly fill the missing video sort of like morph cut, maybe the this could be called generative morph cut.....
Is there any chance you can consider adding the ability to WARP STABILIZE to support keyframes, so you can turn up or down the levels of stabilize (or even style) on a clip. The technical use case is where clip could just needs different parameters but you want/need it to not be frame aligned between the transition of the strength of warp stabilize. Creative use case, basically if you have an already shaky shot, and just want a frame aligned transition where the stabilize comes in, and stops (eased in and out) to show for example a situation where the action needs to be calmed down. Just some ideas, I have been fusing with warp stabilize to try and get to know it better, and felt this could be something worth while having as I was experimenting with settings.
Bonjour, Dans les nouveaux albums dynamiques, il est possible d'indiquer des conditions basées sur l'inclusion ou la présence. En revanche, il n'est pas possible d'indiquer des conditions basées sur l'exclusion ou l'absence. Voici des exemples de conditions qui seraient alors possibles : "Mot clé" + "n'inclut pas" + "VALEUR" "Empacement" + "inclut" + "Aucun emplacement" "Appareil photo" + "n'inclut pas" + "VALEUR" Qu'en pensez-vous ?
The keyframes displayed in a clip in the timeline should auto-scale. Take this example:I have a clip in my timeline with an animated gaussian blur on it. It starts at 0, then after a second it ramps up to 60. In the timeline, if I right-click the clip and do Show Clip Keyframes > Gaussian Blur > Blurriness, I see the keyframes. But there appears to be no difference (in the y-axis) between the "0" keyframe and the "60" keyframe. Ah - I realise why - it's because the Blurriness value can go all the way up to 30,000, so the keyframes are displayed accordingly - ie. there is an imperceptible difference between a "0" keyframe and a "60" keyframe in the grand scheme of 30,000 things. I suggest that the keyframe graph displayed in a clip works just like the graph displayed in the Effect Controls panel - it auto-scales to show the lowest value at the bottom and the highest value (be it 60 or 30,000 or whatever) at the top. All other valeus are plotted accordingly in between. By the way, what is the purpose of "Add Effects..." under "Show Clip Keyframes"? It does nothing. It would be great to be able to display multiple keyframes in here - for example if I'm keyframing some reverb, I'll often want to adjust the dry out and wet out levels so they 'swap over' at the same time. I have to do this using two separate keyframe graphs (in the timeline clip) rather than seeing them all at once.
It maybe already under construction but I would like to suggest the idea for making entire adobe creative suite like photoshop, primiere pro in AR and the n number of possibilities and convinience that would provide the designers , editors and creators as well as those who would want to learn the suite . It's like you can see multiple layers of a photoshop in AR , and tweak individual layers without getting confused . Editing a video could be a ease and a person could be able to visualise their ideas and concepts . 3D modelling could be just sculpting especially with the feature and powers that adobe bring in .
Here's the scenario: I've got a keyframed action with multiple keys, and I'd like to change the speed. No problem. Just select the keyframes and ALT(win) and drag from the last keyframe. The problem: Keyframes no longer sit exactly on any particular frame, so as I scrub/drag around on the timeline it's really easy to think my playhead is sitting on a keyframe because my timeline indicator does snap to the nearest frame. But if the keyframe is actually just 9/10th of the way to that keyframe, I won't know it, I'll make a manual value change (like typing in a Xposition), and because AE will auto-keyframe that change, now suddenly I've got two keyframes so close together that I don't discover it until I zoom all the way in on the timeline, trying to figure out why my animation suddenly jumps in value. The request:-- Give us another modifier key to add (like SHFT-Alt) when we drag, to force all keyframes to snap to the nearest frame-- Have a default action toggle in the Preferences (e.g. Dragged keyframes snap to nearest frame)-- Incorporate a NudgeKeyframes.jsx action with a one-click button for retroactive fixes.The temp workaround to fix problematic keyframes: Kudos for the free asu_NudgeKeyFrames.jsx, by Anders SundstedtThanks!
Whenever you retime a clip / change it's speed/duration, and you apply "Maintain Audio Pitch" it goes from sounding natural to sounding like its passing though a metallic filter, and it becomes more dissonant and tinny, or misaligned stereo-wise. You don't have that problem when you do not maintain audio pitch, however, now it is helium sounding. Both are unusable. I've heard you can work around with using Retime with no maintain audio pitch, and then also apply a Pitch Shifter. That is too time consuming when I need to retime 3-400 clips per project. If Adobe is expecting editors to have to load up all their audio into Audition then back into Premiere, that's a horrendously clunky solution. Is there any way to make it so that Retime along with Maintain Audio Pitch doesn't make clips sound tinny and dissonant? My client hates it and is urging me to use Final Cut because it does not have that problem. Real professionals use Premiere for their work and income source, this is far too simple of a fix to be a problem for professional software that we pay monthly for. Thanks!
I use the Retime feature somewhere between 300-400 times per project, so around 1,200 times per month. Whenever I retime a clip, I have never once not applied "Maintain Audio Pitch". I set my retime keyboard shortcut to 'R'. I like very much that the text field to type in your new percentage number is, by default, highlighted so that I do not have to switch over to my mouse to highlight the text field to type my new speed. I also love that if I select "Ripple Edit" under Retime just once in a project, it remains sticky and does it with every other clip I retime.However I do have to switch over to my mouse every single time to select "Maintain Audio Pitch". It is painstaking and probably compounds to add an extra hour to my edit time just to make all these clicks. As far as I am aware there is no option to turn this on as the default setting. Please, please, please - could Adobe add this, at least as an option. I know many other editors that would cry in relief for this feature to be added. If I could just be hovered over a clip and type "R > [percentage number] > Enter" to retime with Maintain audio pitch selected, I would gain back hours of my life per week, no exagerration. FEATURE REQUEST - Set "Maintain Audio Pitch" to be selected as default. Or, if we select it once in a project, it will remain selected for for all other clips that you retime in that project. PLEASE
I'd like a way to assign a keyboard shortcut to change the FX badge focus on a selected clip in the timeline (motion, opacity, time remapping). I do a lot of keyframe time remapping, and right-clicking each clip gets old. Even changing the default to time remapping instead of opacity would be a win. Any of these solutions would save time in my workflow. Thanks for considering. Upvote if you'd benefit too!
Instead of naming all masks "mask", regardless of the type, it would be very helpful if they're named by mask type. E.g. "brush 1", "brush 2", "linear mask 1", "radial mask 1" and so on. This way it's way easier to pick the right masks when copying the settings from one photo. Most of the time I don't want to copy the brushes, but only the linear and radial masks.
Hi, One thing that would be a good shortcut in my workflow would be the ability to select while using the ripple edit tool. As it is now, I have to go back to the selection tool, select the clips I want to trim, hit B for ripple edit tool and then trim. Even though I'm fairly quick and I know the keyboard shortcuts instinctively, it still feels like an unneccessary extra step in the process. Thanks!
There should be an option to keep the Project panel automatically and continuiously alphabetized. If I add a new clip it goes to the bottom, and my numbered items are always losing order if I duplicate things, which I do constantly. I want that panel to stay A-Z at all times (like Avid).
I would like to make the suggestion for Adobe to add a masking selection for windows. When you have an interior photograph and the exterior showing through the window is a different exposure, it would be super helpful to quickly mask the area of the window to adjust the exposure. I shoot bracketed shots, but even so this would still be a helpful tool.
In "Open Recent" dialog - include File Size and Date Accessed - Date Created & Date Modified are plusses.And in Save As dialog, it will be good to have a secondary flyOut Menu showing poopular options - Same as AEPSelect FolderSurprise Me ... LIke You Always Do 🙂We already have a similar construct in Scripts > Recent Script Files - so hopefully, this doesn't involve crafting a new architecture and can be relatively quick to put out. TIA
As an event photographer (primarily musical theater and dance recitals), I edit large batches of photos (10,000 or more per event). Many of my images have a primary subject with other people in the background who are likely out of focus. Face recognition can be a great resource to help ensure that I have good pictures of each of the participants and to keep those images organized. However, Lightroom's face recognition feature tags faces even if those faces are in the background and out of focus. This severely limits the efficiency of this feature, redering it pretty much unusable for me. I would like to be able to have Lightroom tag ONLY the faces in an image that are in focus.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.