Build better products with our product team
now before you turn captions into graphics you are able to join subtitle boxes together for example if the subtitles were "i" "want this" but you instead wanted it to be "i want this" you can click a keybind and BOOM they are joined together would it be possible to have this same feature after they have been converted into graphics? as i do a lot of subtitle work and i find it much easier to do subtiling after they have been converted to graphics (so i can add effects, adjust ect) but the one thing that is much less efficient is being able to join them together
Why on earth is there STILL not an option to automatically scale strokes and effects in Photoshop like there is in Illustrator? This is 2025 and has to be one of the easiest thing Adobe could possibly implement. As somone who usually has to make 10+ sizes of most graphics, it quite literally drives me crazy to go in and "guess" what the right manual effect scaling could be for every single size. Every rounded corner gets ruined... every stroke... every drop shadow... ALL OF IT.Please Adobe, I'm begging you to fix this. (On a similar note: Please also add a better resize option like Canva has. Or at least a function that lets you rescale an entire artboard with the art proportionately. It's nearly impossible to make a 1080x1080 square into a 2000x2000 square with all of the artwork in the exact same place if I choose to change the size after the fact.)
Quite often I've got a long clip which I'd like to chop up into separate bits and then save each as an individual video file which can be dropped in as needed for use as B roll etc in a project. For example, a 2 min vid will be split into 5 vids named something like "Beach day B roll 1 - John waves". then ".....2 - John dives", "...3 - Mary laughing", "...4 - Kids buying icecream" and "...5 - everyone building sandcastle" etc.But whereas some DAWs make it easy to simply select a clip in that sequence and select 'save as new clip', (thus exporting whatever's selected in the timeline), APP wants me to go through about 20 clicks (select in, select out, etc etc etc etc). It's ludicrous.Can't we have a simple 'export higlighted as new clip' option?
Add option to put a strikethrough line through text.Put it next to the other text options buttons.
The transparency grid is a very useful feature but not always needed for video editing. After Effects conveniently offers a switch button in the viewer. It would be nice if Premiere Pro also offers the option to add it as a button below the program/source monitor so we can get to it faster than the menu option. Even the keyboard shortcut is slower because it requires a mouse click first to activate the Program Monitor. That mouse click could already be on that button...
I am dreaming of having this kind of tool in Essential Tool panel or as an "effect". There's millions of us editing podcasts with Audition and one of the most boring and time consuming tasks is to remove the uhmms and aaahhs one by one in the waveform view. Please see how they do it as Descript. It first creates a transcript of the entire interview and therefore it can highlights any filler words that we can then remove automatically in a just few clicks. It's pretty great right? Yet pretty simple.I wish that Audition aligns with what's being made this year and it's all about AI. I hope you make my dream come true. Thank you for your great work,
This seems straightforward to implement. I would like to see a tool in Premiere Pro that allows the editor to remove sections of video that are silent in their audio track. We would need to define "silence" (maximum audio level) and Length of slience to remove (longer than X seconds or milliseconds or frames.) For an extra option, perhaps a way to move all the removed video slices to a new timeline or at some timecode on the current timeline. Another option would be to join these new automatically created edits with straight cuts, or with a choice of transitions. Example: I edit lectures. Sometimes the speaker takes a dramatic pause, usually less than a second. Other times, he or she pauses to review their notes. These are often 2 seconds or longer. If I could remove the latter while keeping the former, I could get through that busywork and down to the creative editing work quicker. I usually use crossfade between these edits. Thank you.
Exports sometimes fail if the number of channels in the volume normalization on the “Effects” tab does not match the number of audio tracks in the SEQUENCE during export. This is a complete conceptual error!Why does the normalization effect NOT follow the number of tracks as defined on the “Audio Export” tab?Imagine a sequence with 16 mono audio tracks (20 + 51 OV, 20 + 51 M&E) from which I only want to export the first two tracks as a stereo audio file:If I want Premiere to check the audio's compliance with EBU R128, I have to set up the export in a very cumbersome way. According to the currently defined workflow, I have to define the volume part for all 16 audio tracks specified in the sequence properties, even though I am only exporting a stereo file. In practical terms, I have to add all these channels just so I can disable them again. Why do I have to do this to export an EBU R128-compliant stereo audio file?
It would be great to be able to have a model or illustration style be recycle-able for different poses or scenes. For example, to be able to use the same male figure, but be able to submit prompts to generate various poses or expressions, such as happy, angry, or sad.
I feel like as one of if not the primary editing software, Adobe should be held to a higher standard. It has been 5 years since I switched to PC and I still mourn the loss of FCPX (there I said it).1) Live Updating Audio Waveforms - Waveforms are so delicate in this program. If you use multicam or nested sequences you really notice this. Premiere is the only place that makes that feel like a big ask.2) No waveform preview while dragging an audio clip - This is basic stuff. 3) No speed ramping audio - My phone does this. Also the speed ramping UI is way overcomplicated.4) I can't nest audio clips - Why is this not possible? Layering audio is one of my main uses for Nested sequences. 5) Reveal in Project does not set the in and out times of the selected clip - I feel like you can see how this is useful. 6) Multicam and Composite View are mutually exclusive. This again just feels like an arbitrary dictation of my workflow. If my computer can handle it, let me do it. 7) Effects feel function specific when the software itself like it's for beginners. Half the stuff feels like a legacy version mixed in with newer effects. There are better transitions in windows movie maker. Importing effects and plugins is always clunky. The audio effects are not accessible when the rest of the program feels like it's being catered to beginners. Like just give me an underwater filter for example. Instead I am expected to build it myself. Not the end of the world which is why it's at the bottom of my list but it's inconsistent with how beginner friendly stuff like a Launch Page or Render Tab.From what I've read it appears that Adobe is overdue for a major overhaul of their software but are clearly not able to do so. I know FCPX isn't for everyone and has a little kid kind of vibe to how easy it is to use. But the power of that program 10 years ago exceeds where Premiere is now. Anyone who has used Blender before should know just how intuitive software can be. Even for complex tasks. So it becomes insulting that I have to pay Adobe for software that feels outdated because they can get away with it. Like just copy what Blender does. Honestly. Everything should be able to undo, selections, everything. I should be able to keyframe whatever I want.Sorry I just have to use this for work and every day I'm disappointed by something new. Compared to the rest of the industry, Premiere just seems to be failing upwards and I'm not sure why. Just tired of it.
I understand I can create a style that I can then use in my existing project, but I want the ability to set a default font so when I make a new project and start adding text, that it will use the font I want instead of always defaulting to Minion Pro.It will be less tedious to have a default set instead of having to change my font every time I make a project. It would make sense to put this setting into Premiere's settings window, versus the Essential Graphics panel since this would be a global setting independent of a project.
Dear Adobe Team,First, I want to thank you for the incredible work you’ve done with After Effects and Premiere Pro. I’ve personally used Premiere for over 10 years on major television projects and commercials that have aired on networks like NBC, ABC, and others. Adobe has been at the center of my workflow for more than a decade, and I deeply respect how robust and reliable your tools have been.That said, as workflows continue to evolve, speed and efficiency are becoming just as important as capability. Right now, so many creators are turning to other technologies because they don’t want to spend countless hours keyframing, masking, rotoscoping, and handling repetitive tasks that AI can help accelerate. While After Effects is unmatched in depth and precision, it risks falling behind if AI-powered features aren’t implemented quickly.The reality is simple: if Adobe doesn’t move faster in this area, another company will. Creators need smart, intuitive AI tools built directly into After Effects to handle the time-consuming grunt work, so we can focus more on the artistry. You already have the foundation, the reputation, and the trust of professionals everywhere, please don’t lose that edge by waiting too long to adapt.I share this not as criticism, but as someone who has relied on Adobe for years and wants to see it continue leading the industry rather than playing catch-up. I hope you’ll prioritize the integration of AI into After Effects so that it remains the standard for motion design and visual effects in the years ahead.Thank you for your time and for continuing to innovate.
To more quickly add in colour backgrounds behind text. Currently the user needs to use Rectangle which is tricky to scale to fit the video dimensions (e.g. 1920x1080). Something similar to Solids in After Effects or Colour Matte in Premiere.
I have the need to search for images based on their pixel dimensions. For example I want to find images that have a horizontal or vertical dimension of more than 1000px. The pixels dimensions are recorded in the metadata but I cannot see a way of searching or filtering by such criteria.
Beyond just being too much and too many features to click through with Lumetri, it is an annoyance to force onto editors to remove Fast Color Corrector. Can yall just bring back the fast color corrector and stop removing features that seasoned editors prefer. Beyond the confused posts here, and having talked to editing friends who literally share the old "obsolete" effects they have to load every project; many an editor despised this decision. I use lumetri for many things that it's good at. For a fast color correcting it is clunky. The pivots and wheels dont work the same. It's got too much going on for new editors to easily understand and use.Bring back simple features that are good for quick adjustments.
So, when you stack images in LR (for instance, bracketed groups), then select individual stacks, choosing "Edit in Photoshop as Layers" performs as expected, sending the images in the stack to Photoshop as layers. However, if you select two or more stacks and then choose "Edit in Photoshop as Layers", instead of opening a photoshop file for each stack, with each image in any given stack opened as layers, LR opens a single PS file, wth the top image from each stack as a layer. For the life of me I can't understand why anyone would want this.Wouldn't it make more sense to open a Photoshop file for each stack, with each image in the stack as a layer?
It's necessary to bring back a consistent pixel based workflow even in filter sectiond!I'm tired of using trial and error to find the right percentage so that scaling and cropping hit exactly the desired pixel row or pixel column.In After Effects, you can work correctly in this regard!
I'm looking for the feature of being able to convert a capitalized text to lowercase when we paste it into photoshop (although the font supports lowercase). There is a feature to convert from lower case to upper case, but we cannot do the opposite.
Using the web based assets site doesn't respond in the same was as the app did. I used the app as a part of my workflow to send large Photoshop files that would normally be too large to send to a client any other method quickly. I am not able to download a file in the same way from the web from my phone and send it to a client. Seems that this is a downgrade in an era that should only be technology forward for upgrades for the app.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.