Build better products with our product team
I would love the ability to toggle certain UI items off for a more minimal interface on IPad. 1. The bottom bar showing library, device and community tabs. Since I import directly from an SD card I never use the device tab, or the community tab, so I would prefer to disable this bar altogether for less distraction. 2. Photos view on the library sidebar. Due to adobe's data harvesting I will never use this feature. Please give us the option to permanently hide it away.
Just wanted to create a post to highlight some things that really hinder my Premiere Pro experience, in the hope that others agree and changes can be made:The Graphics Templates rely too heavily on thumbnail to understand what they're actually offering. About 75% of the time I purchase a template, it doesn't have all the features I need. For example some have limited font options, or limited options to control timings etc. By the time you realise this, it's too late and you have paid. The model feels - to me - like a revenue trick. There isn't a straightforward way to cancel the purchase that didn't meet expectations, unlike items you would purchase in a shop or supermarket (which I believe is a customer Right in many jurisdictions).Secondly, almost all templates are in HD and not 4K. This is very outdated, particularly for a paid service. Scaling down beats scaling up.I'd love to see these improvements made.
It's Translating the Brand "Trackless" to the word "Sans chenilles." Is there any way to select words so they cannot be translated for names and brands?
Hello Adobe Community. So, when I am working with Adobe Products, I prefer "dark theme", but why context menu in white(I am working on Windows 10)?Okey, you will say "On Windows the contextual menus have always been white", but why in Avid MC and DRV they got own context menu with dark theme? And I think, will be great to create a "new context menu design", because on Mac and Windows they got differect menuBut why you cant create a bar menu like in DVR, because for DaVinci is doesnt matter wich OS do you use And about this roundness on timeline. Right now I'm working on a trailer where I have a lot of cuts and, frankly, it's impossible to see the cuts when moving away from the timeline, click on the file without pressing the fx button.Yes, you took these roundings from DaVinci, but even there it's not done very clearly and well. Previously, when there were straight edges, the fx button was normal - no complaints at all. Now yI have to think, is there a gap between the clips or is it because the design is so new and incomprehensible. The new fx button is not intuitive because before when using this or that effect, it was displayed in color (yellow, green, purple), now it is impossible to understand what is applied, plus since this button was not active, then when selecting a clip I did not think whether I pressed this button or not, now I select a clip, but in fact I press the fx button and the effects control panel opens, which is annoying and I have to turn off the display of this button altogether, which is also not an option, because I want to see in which clip I applied the effect and in which I did not.
Many times, in a long project, certain items are repeated.Dragging them with Alt does not have always desired results. Some times opacities get selected, or if one is zoomed a bit out and has to move a long way things can get messy. Same with copying and pasting if all tracks are not targeted etc. If Premiere could have a Split TimeLine View option, a vertical split line , where one side could move separately than the other, have different timeline zoom levels in each, then one could grab items from say the left view and drag (alt etc) to the right view, copy paste multiple clips etc way faster and with accuracy without errors.(A bit like the color match feature in Lumetri where one can scroll two protions of timeline to match the colors). Even Word proccessors have this option for reviewing different parts of the same document simultaneously.Then with a click, Split view closes and one continues editing normally.it would boost productivity immencely!
Not sure if this feature or something similar exists, but my stupid ass can't find it, so here goes. Adding hotkeys for the actions of:Increasing/Decreasing the HSV sliders of my brush.Example: F = +Value // Shift + F = -Value --etc. "Color Harmony" addon for Hue. Instead of just pressing the buttons to go up and down the slider, it'll jump you to specific hues based on the first color you picked. Basically the "Adobe Color Wheel" site being imported as a functional feature inside of substance painter + its harmony presets. If this or anything similar exists, please let me know 😉
Hi, I am using Lightroom Class version 11.4.1in my Mac Monterey. I am trying to see if we can change the anchor points of watermark for each of the photo while exporting multiple photos using the export button. Because if i export all the photos with the same anchor point in certain photo the watermark is placed over the face. So wanted to check if there is a way to position the watermark for each of the photo while exporting multiple photos
It would be really useful to expand the shortcut capabilities in Photoshop. Currently, there are some limitations. I can’t assign just any key combinations because many are already reserved. Why not try implementing sequential key combinations, such as (CMD+SHIFT+Y, Y)?Additionally, it would be great to have the option to assign shortcuts to the Tool Presets panel.
Description:As the lead editor in our company, my workflow involves importing video footage into the timeline and adding markers to indicate where edits and B-rolls should be placed. Our editors then use these markers as a guide to make the necessary edits. Once editing is complete, we clear the markers and add chapter markers to finalize the edit. It would be extremely helpful if Premiere Pro had a feature to save and manage multiple marker sets. This could be implemented as a dropdown in the Markers panel, allowing users to:Save existing markers with a custom name before clearing them.Switch between different marker sets depending on the editing stage.Restore saved markers if needed later in the process. This feature would streamline collaboration, prevent marker loss, and improve overall editing efficiency. Hope this can be considered in future updates! 😊
I think it would be great if there was some way that we could name a character in a reference image so that we can let the AI know that if in the future, we ever reference that unique character name in the prompt AND we upload that named character in the form of a reference image, then the AI would be smart enough to put two and two together and realize:"Oh, OK, I recognize that name from a previous image that I created, and I remember what the character's face and body looks like. This is the same character name and the reference image matches that character's face and name, so I am going to put that same face and body on the new image. That would revolutionize character continuity in Firefly!
PHOTOSHOP DEVS: Currently, after making a marquee selection (e.g. selecting a person in a photograph) the procress for contracting and feathering that selection is very number-oriented. 5 pixels? What does a 5 pixel feather look like? 5 pixels looks very different when working with a low-res photo vs. a high-res photo. If you don't like the feathering amount after you apply it then you have to start over. I propose a visual way to contract, expand, and feather a marquee selection (similar to the brush adjustment mathod). What if holding control+option+click dragging left, right, up, and down could give you a red overlay that showed you visually what that new selection would look like?
Generative fill used to respect selections a lot more than it currently does.Now it seems to have an extreme "feather" where it edits areas that are not selected. And not just a tiny bit on the edge but pretty far into it. I understand it needs to blend but cant it generate that blend on the outside rather than the inside? I mean it used to do that.I understand they want people without photoshop skills to be able to use generative fill so for those who are bad at making selections can roughly circle and area and generate something there. But can we have an option for professionals to be able to respect your selection bounds and only generate within the selection?TLDR: Have a preference setting to allow Generative Fill to respect selection bounds.
Hello! Here's an extension of something I posted as a suggest/feature request for the Adobe Creative Cloud Desktop app, but applies equally well to the Stock service and Bridge too. URL of original post: https://community.adobe.com/t5/creative-cloud-desktop-ideas/allow-sorting-and-filtering-library-assets-by-licensed-unlicensed-or-non-stock/idi-p/15219236#M2600 Copy and paste content of original post: Hello! I would love, love, LOVE to be able to filter and sort files in my Adobe libraries by what kind of license they have: Licensed (from Adobe Stock), Unlicensed (also from Adobe Stock), or Non-Stock (anything else). We can already do this in the Stock site's library, but not in the CC Desktop App library, or the CC online equivalent library, or in Bridge. But sadly the Stock site doesn't let us move licensed images from one library or group to another - at least, not easily enough that I'd have found it within the last few years. In other words, I would love to have one designated place I can access and manage my Adobe Stock library in detail. Currently different important features are split across several different places - the Stock site, the CC central hub app (whether desktop or online), and Bridge. But if I could do all those features at once in just one software/site/program? Oh, I'd swoon. Here's some screenshots to illustrate what I mean. CC DesktopHere's the CC Desktop app library interface for one of my libraries of Stock images, unsorted and unfiltered.And here's the sort options for that library in this interface.But I can move files here from one library to another. Stock SiteMeanwhile, here's the Stock site's interface for the same library.That same library, filtered to just have Unlicensed.And the same again, but filtered to just Licensed.Here's one of my licensed pictures. There's no option here to move it to another library. Bridge LibraryAnd here's the same library in Bridge.And here's the Filter options. These do not include anything about licenses.And here's the sort options. Again, no mention of licenses.Bridge also allows moving files from one library to another. RequestI'd love to have all of these options together at once in one of these platforms, if not in all three. Specifically, that's the functional option to do all of these:Move files from one library to anotherSort by Licensed, Unlicensed, or Non-StockFilter by Licensed, Unlicensed, or Non-Stock Thank you!
Able to loop active scenes for cycling backdrops or other ideas. It's like tweening the last 1000 frames to return to the same starting point. Ideas for Water rippling or a mountain stream or waterfall shot, wind-blowing trees and fields of wheat, or other static scenes with active cycling. The first frame is held in memory and when there only remains a few seconds the render goes back to the first frame. A loop render would be oh-so-handy for many uses. Can only be done with a still camera. No movement so the software can get back to the exact scene start.
When importing from LR classic into Portfolio the subtile may be shown in Portfolio, but in Béhance the subtitle has to be added manually for every picture. I see no add-in or else making it possible to have (sub)titles shown in Béhance pictures automatically with the imports from LR. As a nature photographer I would at least have the name of a species shown with the photo. Adding these again one-by-one although these are already in Lightroom and Portfolio is a lot of work, but when these are absent the search engines will not find the pictures whilst Portfolio does not feed into the search engines, and Béhance does. Is it not an option to feed automatically (sub)titles and preferably also countries and dates into Béhance. I understood Béhance is meant to feed search engines as a main purpose but that seems to be forgotten in a way. Cheers, Louis
The People interface becomes cumbersome to manage with photo collections of any size even on large monitors. Request the People user interface be extended to support groupings of people, and initial capability and use case would be families based on the meta data of the last name. Future releases could support a person being tagged as not part of the family name and and/or give it a seperate family objects.The feature could be implmented with a slider showing Groups on|off and would then place the images in groups with a face shown allow the user to dive deeper. For example, if I clicked on Brown, it would show all the people with Brown as the last name. The initial group on view probably shouldn't include unmarked people.
I record voiceovers in the multitrack mode of Adobe Audition. This allows me to edit non-destructively. After recording, I go through the track and delete all breath sounds which separates the file into separate clips.Next, I apply subtle symmetrical fades to each clip on the track to smooth transitions between silent and audio sections, eliminating subtle 'pops.' Applying the symmetrical fades can be a very time-consuming process depending on the length of the recording. I've been wanting this for years. Somebody please make this happen!
Hallo, Wie kann ich in dem automatisch generierten Transkript Fehler beheben und Anpassungen machen? Leider lässt sich nichts ändern in dem Transkript.Danke für Ihre Hilfe
Hello community and Dev Team!Currently, the "Lightroom" provides a crop overlay for grids, etc. A slight inconvenience about this is that the grid does not appear when you are using the up/down keys to fine-tune the straighten. (It appears when moving the bar with the mouse and when hovering over the image.) It would be helpful if the overlay could be enabled when hovering the straighten bar or at any time, so that manual adjustments could be easy and accurate.Thanks & Regards,
The uhm detection and removal feature is quite useful!However, to avoid jump cuts in visuals, some clients prefer the "mute" method, where the audio is muted for uhms but the visual track is untouched, creating a smoother more natural continuity. Currently I have to do this manually, but it would be nice to use the same tool that removes and creates a cut, to also have a mute option.
It would be really nice if Adobe had a way that users could list out EXACTLY what they spent every one of their generative credits on. I'm down to only a little over 200 generative credits, and I know that I have only generated about half of the images that I would have needed to in order to burn through that many credits. When I ask Adobe support, they just tell me :We don't have the ability ti see where all of the credits were spent on on a credit by credit basis. Yep I know. Hence my post.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.