Build better products with our product team
When editing captions I often resize the bounding box depending if they are one line or two. Auto-generated captions always have line breaks - sometimes after a single word. Which means going to each caption block just to delete these superfluous spacings
I currently utilize the keyboard shortcut to move all video targets up or down in Adobe Premiere, which is a valuable feature for copying clips across tracks. However, I propose adding a similar or new keyboard shortcut to move source patching up or down. This would significantly streamline the workflow when inserting or overriding clips from the source monitor, as it would eliminate the need to manually adjust source patching.Benefits:Increased efficiency: By automating the process of moving source patching, users can save time and focus on creative tasks.Improved workflow: A dedicated keyboard shortcut would provide a more intuitive and streamlined experience for editing and post-production.Enhanced productivity: By reducing manual steps, users can potentially increase their overall productivity.Possible Solutions:New keyboard shortcut: Assign a unique keyboard combination to move source patching up or down.Option within existing shortcut: Add an option to the existing "Move All Video Targets Up/Down" shortcut to toggle between moving targets and source patching.Contextual menu: Implement a contextual menu that appears when a clip is selected in the source monitor,allowing users to quickly move source patching up or down.I believe that this enhancement would greatly benefit Adobe Premiere users and contribute to a more efficient and enjoyable editing experience.
When multiple clips are selected on the timeline, we should be able to use the effect control panel to adjust basic parameters like Zoom, Position, Rotation, Opacity, and Crop simultaneously.Crop should be added to the default parameters in the effect control panel.Ripple trim should have an option to affect only selected clip(s) and leave the rest of the unselected clips alone.Copy and paste should happen on the same track regardless of the project or active track.The overlay should have a dedicated shortcutA power bin should be added to premiere to house frequently used graphics or footageThe effect Control panel lacks a lot of useful features. Searching for those effects in the effects panel is a bit waste of time. Useful audio effects like EQ, Denoiser, and Compressor should be in the effect control panel by default.
Please add b&w gradient map feature to Lightroom/Lightroom Mobile for high contrast black and white images.
Right Click > Close should be an option on the apps. Similar to how all other programs behave in Windows.
the app frame under windows is extremely getting in the way of my photoshop workflow. having used PS since the early 90s on macs, the last 10 years i was working more on PCs. not having the app frame as an optional item in photoshop is annoying.please make the app frame optional under windows. feel free to turn the app frame on by default, so most windows users won't get confused.
For a lot of poeple now using stiching software, doing large format printing, or digital muraling, we're limited by a 4gb tiff limit. This means for prints bigger than around 15ft x 9 ft we need to start chopping ppi to export as a tiff. As someone who works with tech often printing 40ft murals, it would be so helpful to be able to save as Big Tiff files instead of just Tiff. I know this is felt by many people in the gigapixel and large print world.
I am an editor of social media content, including vertical reels. After a podcast is edited, we sometimes need to reposition the clips so that one person is stacked vertically at the top and another at the bottom of the window. Because the horizontal YouTube-version edit comes first, we use enabling/disabling of tracks to cut between the two people. After this, we have to enable all disabled tracks so that we can then reposition them side by side. This can take 10-15 minutes to do. Current way: Let's say you want to enable all the disabled clips on a track. Currently, you have to hand select each one and then enable/disable, to toggle their visibility. Another way is to lock the other tracks and either use up and down arrow keys, or drag the playhead, with Selection follows Playhead enabled, and then page to each one and enable/disable. Proposed idea: On the left side, where you choose track toggling and source patching, it would be great to be able to right-click a track (like when you are going to add/delete tracks) and choose "select all enabled clips" and "select all disabled clips". This would then pick every clip on that track that is enabled/disabled. This would be a huge time-saver.
Dear Adobe Premiere Pro Team,I am writing to bring attention to a significant feature gap in Adobe Premiere Pro. Unlike competitors such as DaVinci Resolve and Adobe After Effects, Premiere Pro currently lacks a fundamental feature that allows users to cut clips at the playhead to the start or end of the clip with a shortcut key, without affecting other layers.Issue Summary:Missing Feature: The ability to trim or cut a clip from the playhead to the start or end without impacting adjacent layers is essential for efficient editing. This feature is available in both DaVinci Resolve and After Effects, which makes its absence in Premiere Pro particularly noticeable.Impact: The current process requires manual adjustments and frequent changes in track targeting, leading to inefficiencies and disruptions in the editing workflow.Request: I strongly urge the Adobe Premiere Pro team to consider implementing this feature to match the capabilities of competitors and enhance the editing experience. The ability to quickly cut a clip from the playhead to the start or end using a shortcut key—without affecting other layers—would greatly streamline the workflow and improve overall productivity.Thank you for considering this enhancement. I believe it will be highly beneficial to many users and align Premiere Pro with the industry standards.Best regards,CineSabbir
For working with solo layers, I often need a second level of soloing.In compositions with over 100 layers, after soloing 20+ layers, I often want to solo a few of them without affecting the current solo list.Pre-composing usually impacts absolute parameters, and I don't want to tweak them using JS control layers.A double-solo or multi-level solo system, where the user can choose the number of solo levels, would be a handy feature to work with.
In my campaign to try to release HDR paintings I discovered an annoyance with saving the format that might actually see broad support (thats not JXR) AVIF due to it's compression (in my test a 8GB JXL is 200kb in AVIF both HDR) Then i tried to save one of these files and it took me a LONG time to figure out how, and it turns out I had to open camera raw which is split between a filter version and an entire other interface I had never used before. The simple thing is just let people normally save an AVIF like they can HDR and EXR rather than having to go through the roudabout process of opening camera raw, the other one not the one in the filter menu I guess. This is just confusing and frustrating for no reason. At the very least make opening Camera Raw easier, like this old thread says.Re: how do you open a photo in Camera Raw without ... - Adobe Support Community - 2812875 I don't need bridge, don't make me have bridge to open a photoshop feature, or have to save a particular file in a particular format and open it to open camera raw. This is all very confusing and I don't understand why. If I have a painting, and I want to save it as an AVIF, the workflow for that is ridiculous currently.
I applaud that Adobe wishes to promote transparency around the use of AI in imagery.However, forcing the addition of Content Credentials (CCs) is a bad move for several reasons:The whole point of the AI debate is that humans should be in control, not computers. Forcing CCs is exactly the opposite of this. The chain of trust must always begin and end with humans, not software. That's the whole point.Minor use of AI to touch up a photo is basically equivalent to Content-Aware Fill or Healing Brush, or traditional airbrushing.It is actually less transparent. Adobe does not make it clear if there is a threshold for the amount of AI usage that triggers the forced addition of CCs. Clarifying this threshold doesn't help. No threshold can truly reflect usage of AI that is deceptive vs benign.People already know that images – even before the age of AI – can't always be trusted. CCs don't really add anything to this, in fact they create a false sense of security when CCs are absent.It is trivial to remove CCs from an image for anyone who actually wants to deceive. This further emphasises the problem of a false sense of secuity.The current implementation often erroneously forces CCs when no, or extremely minimal, AI was present. This can occur for instance if a file was loaded that previously used AI, but all trace of the AI has actually since been removed. This isn't a bug that needs to be fixed. It illustrates the fundamental problem with a system where the software decides.CCs don't make any difference if the end medium isn't digital, or isn't able to display the CCs.I would put it to Adobe that Content Credentials is an excellent initiative, but it is a feature that must be in the user's control.It is up to me to decide whether it's important to disclose that AI has been used. If I removed a few dust marks in the background, no one cares. If I'm trying to sway an election, let my conscience be my judge. If I've made a satirical image and I want people to laugh, but not get the wrong idea, I certainly would choose to include CCs.A forced digital watermark is not, and cannot, be a magic solution to the moral questions that surround the manipulation of images.
In the Develop module, when selecting the crop action, the default crop ratio that is selected to be applied to the image is set to 2:3 by default. That default cannot be changed. As a result, when editing a large number of pictures that would ALL require the same crop ratio but different from the 2:3 default (4:5 for example), you will need for each image, to select the crop action, then select 4:5, then do your crop. It would be great if the Default could be changed so when selecting the crop action you do not have to select the same different ratio all the time (which could lead to errors and waste of time). Current workflow: For each images: Select crop Tool > Select new crop ratio (4:5 for example) > Crop New workflow: Once: Set default to the desired ratio (4:5 for example)For each image: Select Crop tool > Crop
I've been a CC subscriber for years, working heavily on the photo side the past few years, with only occasional video projects nowadays, and I am baffled at how PP is supposed to be a stable program for working professionals. With a brand new M3 Max MacBook Pro, PP has locked up after trying to use warp stabilizer on a dozen clips (4K from Canon mirrorless). It's simply choking and doing nothing, with no frames being analyzed and none of the timers going down. Is the app not smart enough to analyze one clip after another and get it done? Worse, I try to save the project, and the save dialog box just sits there. I can press cancel, and go back to editing, but the dialog box stays up on screen because the UI is borked. I try to close out of PP and it asks then if I want to save, and I say yes, and then those dialog boxes are stuck on screen, without any saving happening. This is SO basic. I'm not even complaining about the memory leak I had to deal with last week before this where PP and AME would just eat up 100gb of RAM and crash. I managed to get that part of the project done, and am literally just trying to consolidate some b-roll clips to export, and PP can't do it.
Hey guys.There are two shortcuts there that are only enabled when using the pen tool. They are PLUS and MINUS.+: Combine Shapes-: Substruct Front Shape Currently, these tool tips do not appear in the application.It used to be displayed. This is a capture from version 6.0, although I only have the Japanese version. I tend to unintentionally press the MINUS when I accidentally press the keyboard shortcut for zooming out, especially in the case of the MINUS.I have seen this many times confuse beginners who are not used to dealing with paths.I have also never seen a user make effective use of PLUS and MINUS.The default is “Exclude Overlapping Shapes” at the bottom. These two keyboard shortcuts are not user editable.I think they should be eliminated.Or they should be editable.
Dear PS team,Please add a function to Photoshop running on Windows to turn the application frame on and off, similar to the Mac version of the app. As a PS user since the early 90s, and having abandoned Mac as my main work platform a couple of years ago, I find the PS application frame the largest hinderence to work efficiency, and a large source of extra clicks and general annoyance working in PS. My work requires me to work on many files, doing small and short tasks, on my 3-screen desktop setup, and the app frame is just uselessly in the way all the time. PS team, please consider this for the next release.
Hello. I love the Premiere pro but sometime somthings cause slow workflow like below my description.after click on import command in media browser panel, panel automatically changes to project panel so i should go back to media brwoser. when i gonna to import a afew clips it is fine but when i gonna to import a lot off footage, this is makes slow work flow.thanks.Manisoft
Currently, Adobe's SSO mechanisms do not allow you to customize which IdP attributes map to which Adobe profile fields. You are restricted to using the "default" attributes dictated by Adobe: https://helpx.adobe.com/enterprise/using/automatic-account-creation.html#attribute-mappings Adobe support states that the attribute release should be handled/customized on the IdP end and that this feature is not offered by Adobe. In a lot of SAML and LTI implementations, it is against best practice to override standard attributes with new values on the IdP end. Instead, you are able to release additional custom attributes, and the SP or Tool Provider (Adobe, in this case) should be able to map those to Adobe's profile fields. For example - the Canvas LMS, does not allow you to override attributes at all. You can only add new attributes per-tool, that are prefixed with "custom_". This causes an issue with Canvas, specifically, because Canvas allows users to change their default email address. What most Canvas admins do to circumvent issues, is release an additional attribute like "upn" or "eppn" which contains the user's official school email address. Much like other apps, Adobe's user mapping, is done through email address. But other apps, allow you to say, "use the UPN attribute for email address". Given these limitations, the Adobe LTI for Canvas, cannot be used properly in our environment in it's current state, as Adobe cannot properly match up users who have modified their Canvas emails.
Dear Adobe Team,I’ve encountered a few issues with Adobe Cloud and Adobe Portfolio that I believe need improvement:No Option for Batch Download in Cloud StorageWhen sharing a folder with many photos, there is no option for the recipient to download all the files at once. This makes it incredibly tedious to download multiple files, especially when the folder contains a large number of photos.Unnecessary Local Backup When Sharing via CloudWhen sharing files through Adobe Cloud, the system also creates a backup on my local computer. This is unnecessary and redundant, especially when compared to traditional cloud storage services that do not create local duplicates. It would be great if this could be an optional feature.Adobe Portfolio: Images Can Be Enlarged and Easily ScreenshottedOn Adobe Portfolio, images can be clicked and enlarged, making it easier for others to take screenshots. This is a serious concern for those of us who want to protect our work. There should be an option to restrict image enlargement to minimize this risk.I hope these suggestions can help improve Adobe’s cloud and portfolio services.Best regards,
I hate to say it. My clients want that trendy TikTok-retention-fueled captions. If there could be more tools in the captions space (similar to CapCut) it would be incredibly helpful to streamline these captions.
The background of captions should be able to use linear and radial gradients...
if i make my subtitles in preimer pro by transcribing , i wanna animate them in after effects , if i link them all to after effects , it imports all the footage as normal , but the graphic layers imports as comps , and the text layeyrs are inside them , it would be a good idea if the were out and would be easy to animate it by third party apps that only animate text layers not comps.
I would love to see 2 improvements made to the Captioning tool.1. Being able to Export a .vtt file, not just an .srt. I work for an organization that uses a service that only accepts .vtt files. It would be nice not having to go into the file and change all the commas to periods. It's a real time suck, especially to make sure we don't accidentally change the punctuation in a sentense. It's also nice since we can't just install or use online tools to convert files. 2. I would like a "character counter" so I know how many characters are in a line. I think this is a very specific scenario, but when working with captions and transcripts, it's hard to make sure I'm counting correctly and I don't have time to count each character. This is a semi-accessibility reason, for Braille readers, as personally and organizationally, I don't want to have text broken in inconvient spots.
It would be massively helpfull if you could not only export your graphics as a CSV-file but also import them and via Timecode place them directly onto your timeline using for instance a MOGRT as a style. Much like you do with captions. For localization of content this could be incredibly helpfull and set the standard for graphics-list.
I would like to see the tools from Adobe Premiere more aligned with the actual social media content people share:-I think is important to have an option where not only choose from characters and lines on captions. I would like to choose how many words I want to see per caption. So I have the option to keep just one or 2 words. -Also, I would like to have a feauture where is animated the captions like karaoke per word and different style. I think this is time saver for the editors and I'm frustrated to see that everyone stills do it manually. Where some apps in the phones do it easy. Some apps like Kapwing do the karaoke thing so good. Thank you Adobe
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.