Is it wrong to remove the watermark of an image even if I want to use it in a non-commercial way?

Question

Sometimes I like to make photo manipulations on Photoshop using the pictures that I find in Adobe Stock, when doing that I usually remove the watermark of the pictures using the tools inside Photoshop, but is it okay to do that? Most of the time I save the finished image on my computer but when I really like the result of it I post it on my Instragram and on my Twitter, I want to know if doing that is illegal or something. I've heard somewhere that removing the watermark of stock photos and selling them it's illegal and it can result in a $25,000 fine, but I'm not selling the pictures that I make, I am just sharing them with my friends on social media, it's okay to do that, right?

PS: If you're asking why can't I just license the pictures, it's because Adobe haven't made it possible to do that on my country yet.

twaritar3263062 · Accepted Answer

Hi Caleb,Ideally, you should not remove the watermark of an Adobe Stock image even though you are using the low-resolution file. Adobe Stock only grants a right to use images and does not transfer the ownership.However, if you still wish to use the low-resolution file, you should give a credit line to the photographer when you put them on social media, however, if you use modified images the credit line will become optional.Note: It entirely depends on the modification you make. If the modifications are minor, credits are necessary.Also, you may want to check with the resellers whether there is a purchase option for Adobe Stock in your region.Please see the link provided:find partners Feel free to update this thread in case of any additional questions.RegardsTwarita

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.