『アドビコミュニティフォーラム』に質問/トピックを投稿する方法
Questions
新着順
Looking for Feedback on these recent Image Uploaded that have came back with the rejected reason being Quality Issues. What are the possible Issues with the Image and why it has been rejected to work on in future? Thanks
I put this image up twice. I put this as a real image, not AI. It sells really well on other sites, and they keep saying it's an AI image. I have others from the series. I don't know how to get around this. Maybe someone will see this in the thread. I took this with a real camera.
Hello Adobe Stock Contributors and Adobe Team,I am seeking clarification regarding recent video rejections for "Quality Issues."Over the past review cycle, I submitted a batch of AI-generated 4K videos created using a consistent workflow. I have also included a Google Drive folder containing two rejected video files for reference and review.Workflow:• High-resolution AI image generation (4K source images)• Kling 3.0 Native 4K video generation• Adobe Premiere Pro export• QuickTime ProRes 422 LT master files• 3840×2160 resolution• 24 fps• Rec.709 color space• Maximum Depth enabled• Maximum Render Quality enabledRecent submission batch:• Submitted: 33 videos• Approved: 1 video• Pending review: 5 videos• Rejected for "Quality Issues": 27 videosMany of these videos were rejected for "Quality Issues," while only a small number were approved.I understand that Adobe reviews for technical problems such as:• Flickering• Frame instability• Morphing artifacts• Compression issues• Temporal inconsis
i love photography but i do not have a DSLR. the photos all i took was from mobile samsung s24 and i wanted to showcase it but adobe has refused the photographs… there should be some considerations for mobile photography as all were unfiltered ones. i can filter it if its required but just to show the quality i did it
What’s wrong with this photo? Reason for rejection – quality issues. Can the upload process cause quality loss? When I look at the thumbnails after uploading, they really do appear blurry, even though the original photos are perfectly fine.
Back in April, I had $2,280.76 in my Adobe stock account and I tried to transfer the money using Paypal. The money just dissapeard and never showed up in Paypal. There is a history of a cancelled payment but when I asked Adobe for help several times they either ignored my requests or told me there was nothting to they could do. No explanation. II asked to elevate my support request and they said “NO”.
I had $2,280.76 disapear from my account and Adobe tells me I have no recourse. I tried several times to reach out the support would not help.
Photo was rejected for Missing Generative AI FlagMissing Generative AI Flag. This photo was rejected for missing generative AI flag. But this image is not AI. What should I do?
Hello,My Adobe Stock Contributor account (ID: 211898903) was deactivated recently. I received an official link to appeal under Case #00514520 and successfully filled out and submitted the transparency center appeal form about a week ago.However, I have not received any confirmation or status updates regarding my appeal yet. As a vector artist who creates all original content, I am very anxious to know the progress. Could any Adobe Moderator or staff here please help look into this case or forward it to the review team?Thank you so much for your support.
This is an open traffic intersection in my city. The picture shows its night view with all the lights on, and lots of people come here to take photos.
Hello, My Payoneer account has been successfully linked and I have received confirmation. My W-8BEN tax form is validated. However, the payout section still shows "Connecting..." and I cannot submit content because I receive the message: "Submission disabled. Please set up your payout information before submitting content." More than 36 hours have passed since linking Payoneer. Could someone please help resolve this issue? Thank you.
These were accepted at two other agencies. What do you think Adobe is seeing in these images that is unacceptable? These were generated in ChatGPT Pro and finished in Gemini. I am paying for two services to get these right. Six of my other images were rejected for being too similar. I put them into the search, and there was nothing like them. I'm really getting frustrated again.
Hello, I received the following about my photos for quality issues but do not specifically state what those issues are and how I can resolve prior to the next upload. I have read what you are looking for and presented that but they were still not accepted. “Thanks for giving us the chance to consider your image. Unfortunately, this image doesn't meet our quality standards so we can’t accept it into our collection.Common issues that can impact the technical quality of images include exposure issues, soft focus, excessive filtering or artifacts/noise. Learn more about our technical requirements here.To learn more about the type of content we’re looking for, please visit this page.If you are looking for specific feedback on your image, we recommend you create a post in the critique forum where you can solicit feedback from other Adobe Stock Contributors.”If the reviewers are going to critique the images, the least they can do is provide that feedback instead of putting it all in one blank
I stumbled across an image that I found quite disturbing and possibly problematic
How do I delete a previously rejected file? How do I delete a previously rejected file? I can't find any options when selecting a rejected file.😥
I've been an active Adobe Stock contributor for a while, mainly working through the mission-based submissions. About two months ago, after submitting a photo that wasn't accepted, missions simply stopped appearing for me — no new invitations since then.I'd like to understand whether this is a temporary pause related to that one rejection, or if there's something else affecting my eligibility. Is there a way to check my mission status or request a review? Any guidance from contributors who experienced something similar would be very helpful.
Hi everyone, my image was rejected for 'Artifacts/Noise'. I want to know how I can improve the quality for my future uploads. Here is the image.
As a contributer I have according to Adobe respect the local copyright laws for my photos. However when I do so often my works are refused because of Copyrights according to North Ameria by your AI tool (I suppose) In The Netherlands the law says:Building from the public roadPermitted: According to Article 18 of the Copyright Act (freedom of panorama), you may photograph buildings and works of art permanently placed in public space without disturbance.Condition: This applies only if the building is visible from the public road (for example, from a sidewalk or street).In the Netherlands, copyright lasts until 70 years after the death of the architect.Is it possible fot Adobe to respect le local copyright laws so my work isn't rejected by your AI? Thanks in advance.Kind regardsFred Bervoets
Hi, can someone explain why these images were rejected due to quality issues?1234
My Adobe Stock contributor account, active since 2019, was deactivated on March 19, 2026.During six years as a contributor, I never received a warning or suspension and I have always complied with the Adobe Stock Contributor Terms and Submission Guidelines.I submitted an appeal on the same day and have since sent several follow-ups through the official Contributor Support channels. Most recently, Adobe Support advised me to contact Contributor Support directly, which I had already done.It has now been over three months without receiving the outcome of my appeal or any update regarding its status.Has anyone experienced a similar waiting period, or is there another way to confirm whether my appeal is still under review?Thank you.
Can someone please tell me what intellectual property is in this totally made-up fantasy image? Created on ChatGPT.It is made up. It is a fantasy. I don't get it. This is the second rejection from two inspectors. Please help. During our review, we found that it contains elements that appear to be protected by intellectual property (IP) laws, so we can't accept it into our collection. Elements protected by IP may appear in the image or in the description, title, and/or keywords.
Why are assets like this being allowed on adobe stock? When zoomed out it looks ok but is completely unusable. It is not labelled as Ai generated but is definitely not being designed by hand. Everything on their profile is the same. https://stock.adobe.com/ca/images/sleek-red-and-black-graphic-wrapped-pickup-truck-with-racing-stripes/2025585112?prev_url=detailhttps://stock.adobe.com/ca/images/high-speed-race-car-with-blue-and-white-graphic-wrap-showcased-on-a-track-highlighting-aerodynamic-design-and-bold-paint-motif/1940768946?prev_url=detail
Hi! So I just tried to submit this photo right here for sale on Adobe Stock: https://ibb.co/Lzh9XnHDBut it was rejected for quality issues. Any critique would be appreciated. I also attached a photo with a preview of the photo in case you don’t want to open the link for the photo itself.Regards.
Remix with Firefly Community Gallery
Thousands of free creations to fall in love with and remix in Firefly.
すでにアカウントをお持ちですか?ログイン
アカウントをお持ちではありませんか? アカウントを作成
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.