Stock Contributors

"AESTHETIC OR COMMERCIAL APPEAL OF IMAGEThanks for giving us the chance to consider your image. Unfortunately, during our review we found that it doesn't have the aesthetic or commercial appeal we're looking for, so we can't accept it into our collection." Sometimes it seems automated image reviews systems have no logic to them at all. Shame

Merhaba profilime 767ürün yükledim.Bu ürünler yalnızca kendi hesabımda görünüyor. Farklı tarayıcılardaki aramalarda, farklı doğrudan aramalarda veya anahtar kelimelerle aramalarda görünmüyor. Bu nedenle indirmeyi başaramadığımı düşünüyorum. Destek için 3 kez form gönderdim ancak herhangi bir yanıt alınamadı.Boşuna dosya yüklüyormuşum gibi çalışıyor.  

Hello, I need your help with that.Your account has a validation status issue. You should Contact us." I sent a message to the "Contact us", but no answer, "spam" directory is empty. What should I do? I've never tried to break the law if i have done it then it will must be unintentionally need to know why my account has a validation issue I'm a Digital Calligrapher & work since 2015All of my submissions or 100% genuine

Hello, I deleted my contributor stock account. But my Photo site is not deleted. It has been reported that 1 has been sold. (https://stock.adobe.com/de/contributor/209244726/cemkaya) I re-opened an account from the same email, but I can't access this page anymore. What should I do?

Hello folks. I'm new here and I need help to understand and know what to do in a particular case: I have uploaded an image that I did many years ago using photoshop filters. I had a refusal due to non-complaiant with the following comments: "Possible reasons: - Non compliant use of another artist’s name. - Undeclared Generative AI Content. - Content not compliant with overall guidelines" Witch one you think that was the reason. Of course for sure it is not AI generated because this image was done when AI was not available. I have a group of images and illustrations of the same kind that I did with photoshop filters, do I have to discard all? thank you so much in advance   [moderator corrected subject for clarity. Was: Non-complaint …]

Hello everyone, I've been looking for the answer but I honestly haven't found it. With images generated by AI one can "check" and leave proof that they were generated by AI. But... in vectors? I tried to upload an .EPS and there is no "check box" to mark the same as in images, should I clarify it in a title and that would be enough? Thank you

Hi! I've made payment output by 30 of October but money still didn't come. Can somebody help me?

Hello. I would like to know the exact reasons for the rejection of the attached illustrations. Thank

Hi all I'd like to know your opinion about this photo and why it was rejected due to quality issues? I use 5000 x 5000 px  Thank's 

Please help me! I can't find the option to download photo of my ID. I have alredy  filled in the tax form, and when uploading a photo, it does not give me the option to upload an ID. 

Good day.I have 1 image rejected today for non compliance.Possible reasons:- Non compliant use of another artist’s name.- Undeclared Generative AI Content.- Content not compliant with overall guidelines: I created and rendered an image using blender 3D. I usually just set the size to 6k or 8k, make some adjustments and then submit it for review. This would normally take 8-18 hrs or more for 1 image with the current PC I'm using depending on the complexity.  So I tried cutting the image render size in half to save some time and just upscale the rendered image (resize using  AI). Below is the test image I submitted for review and it was rejected for the above possible reasons: My question is, for my next submission if I plan to resize another image, should I title and tag it as 3D rendered or just go straight with AI Generated Content with no mention of "3D rendered" to avoid rejection? Maybe the reason is something else under the third one, but it's not a Quality iss

Hi, I generated a picture and further edited with Photoshop more than 60-70%, such as adding icons that I drew myself, adding lighting effects, retouching, etc.  Should I submit by selecting Generative AI?

Hi, I posted some photos, none of which are AI generated, and after 17 days they are still under review. Could you please guide me? Thank you   [Moderator moved the thread to the correct forum]

Olá amingos, tenho dinheiro por receber da Adobe Stock, e estou com minha conta bloqueada por problema de Validação que até o momento não sei o motivo. Já tentei de todas formas tentar falar com alguém e até o momento, nenhuma resposta, como tenho dinheiro por receber, gostava de saber qual o procedimento.    [Moderator moved the thread to the correct forum]

[Filter: sexual] anthonyd48118428's post subject matched "nude" and body matched "nude", board "stock". Post Subject: nude stock photo model release Subject text "nude" matched filter pattern "nude". Post Body: Hello   Is a model release needed for a nude stock photo if the subject's face is not in the photo? Just the legs and buttocks. Body text "nude" matched filter pattern "nude". Post by User[id=1878498,login=anthonyd48118428] was rejected for the following end-user facing error(s): The message subject contains nude, which is not permitted in this community. Please remove this content before sending your post. The message body contains nude, which is not permitted in this community. Please remove this content before sending your post.

Please help me. When i click button 'My Portfolio", i can't find find it.

Why my image rejected. You gave reason of this please can you explain more, so I may repeat same mistake everytime. thanksthe reason was: "Common issues that can impact the technical quality of images include exposure issues, soft focus, excessive filtering or artifacts/noise." and the second reason for rejection was: During our review, we found that it contains elements that appear to be protected by intellectual property (IP) laws, so we can't accept it into our collection. Elements protected by IP may appear in the image or in the description, title, and/or keywords. Thanks and waiting for your response.

Hello, I am enjoy photography as a hobby (lol...hence the screen name). But I also happen to make a few dollars here and there selling on Adobe Stock. I would really like to hear back from the more experienced professionals photographers who have been selling stock photos (or just in the world of photography) for 10(+) years. Question: knowing what you know now about selling stock photos (or photography in general). What would you have done differently when you were first starting out?

Hi allI got images rejected with this explanation: We are looking for imagery intended to illustrate articles on current events and news, focused on conceptual imagery using real brands and products to convey strong ideas. From other side the artefacts are located in place with entrance fee and by my understanding (of the Adobe rules) they can't be with commersial license and must be educational. So is this mean Adobe do not want at all ordinary images from museums (for example)?

Hello everyone, I would like to ask you at the forum for advice on why this and other similar images were rejected for the following reasons:- Incorrect use of another artist's name.- Undisclosed generative AI content.- Content that does not comply with general guidelinesI can confirm that the images are real photographs taken with DSRL and not produced by AIThank you very muchEnrico

It appears that the Adobe server is down, and as a result, I am unable to use it.

Image 1: All cabins are AI generated. Appropriate, AI boxes were checked. Image was accepted.  Image 2: The cabin is AI generated. Appropriate boxes were checked. Image rejected due to non-compliance. Question: I do not know what is wrong with this image or what makes it non-compliant. I would like to fix this image. But I cannot do so if I do not know what I have done wrong. 

Good afternoon. Can someone explain to me why about 70% of the images I generate in Midjourney that I upload are rejected with "QUALITY ISSUES"?I am always very careful about the quality of the images, checking them for defects and doing upscales and clearly follow these guidelines for AI images but always about 70% of the work is rejected without explanation.For example today I got a message that only 4 out of 25 images of the room with the fireplace were accepted. All images was generated with the same prompt and upscaled and I don't see any quality issues there at all. Why is this happening all the time?For example, what are the problems with this image that I attached to the post? Where is any quality issues here? 

Hello respected CS!i was received email from adoeb for 09 oct,2023. your account is tempory blacok and you need to contact adobe stock conteributor team. sent a message to the "Contact us" link, but no answer. i was contact them in my 1st priority. But since i have no received any reponsed form them, also  i checked my spam box and fillterd the messages.  i read all guidelines and next time i will follow all policy requirement.What I should do next ? What is wrong ? How can I validate and what to validate ?Kind regards !https://contributor.stock.adobe.com/en/account-issue