• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

After Effects 2024 slow rendering even when comp is fully cached to ram?

New Here ,
Jun 02, 2024 Jun 02, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Just wondering if something is going on and whether I'm missing something here. My comp caches to ram pretty quickly and 'pre-renders' in AE. However, when I hit render on a sequence from the queue - in this instance a PNG / JPG sequence - it takes ~25minutes to write out 360 frames.

 

The PNGs are about 5Mb each. The footage is FHD. I swear in older versions of AE this would have exported out in minutes due to it being cached already. I can't understand why it's taking so long.

 

Anyone have any ideas? 

 

Thanks in advance! 

Jordan366164316x0e_0-1717357351402.pngJordan366164316x0e_1-1717357372228.png

 

 

TOPICS
Error or problem , Performance , Preview

Views

424

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Community Expert , Jun 04, 2024 Jun 04, 2024

You may find this article interesting:

https://www.provideocoalition.com/after-effects-performance-part-14-make-it-faster-for-free/

 

Scroll down to "Don't use PNGs".

 

The article also gets into writing a frame from a cached render versus rendered from scratch.

 

 

Votes

Translate

Translate
Community Expert ,
Jun 02, 2024 Jun 02, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

How does the render time compare if you queue the Comp up again but use TIFF instead of PNG?

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Jun 04, 2024 Jun 04, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Wow, yes, the TIFFs are pretty much instant whereas the PNGs take way longer Jordan366164316x0e_0-1717486681615.png

I just don't remember it being this slow before! 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Jun 04, 2024 Jun 04, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

just tried JPEG too and they're a similar speed to writing the TIFFs (6 seconds) 

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 04, 2024 Jun 04, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

You may find this article interesting:

https://www.provideocoalition.com/after-effects-performance-part-14-make-it-faster-for-free/

 

Scroll down to "Don't use PNGs".

 

The article also gets into writing a frame from a cached render versus rendered from scratch.

 

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Jun 04, 2024 Jun 04, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Cheers Warren, I had no idea that they were so slow.
TIFFs it is then! 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines