Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
  • 한국 커뮤니티
0

After effects render speed vs premiere

Explorer ,
Dec 23, 2019 Dec 23, 2019

Hello are there explanation why, in after effects rednderin mxf files aren't in real time when playback and render times is 4 times more than in premiere, both exporting to prores with lumetri fx only. media encoder also slow, same as ae.

TOPICS
Performance , Preview , Resources
4.5K
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Employee ,
Dec 23, 2019 Dec 23, 2019

Hi there,

 

Thanks for reaching out. Here's an article that explains how Premiere and After Effects are different in terms of processing the video: https://community.adobe.com/t5/after-effects/faq-why-doesn-t-after-effects-preview-in-real-time-like...

 

Let us know if there are any other questions.

 

Thanks,

Nishu

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Explorer ,
Dec 23, 2019 Dec 23, 2019

I understand about previews, my question was also about final render time which is 4 times more in ae with same effects. just color correction with lumetri, premiere has ~15fps while final render and ae ~5fps.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Dec 24, 2019 Dec 24, 2019

If your want the comunity to help you better, please give us more system info:

- OS version

- Versions of the Adobe application(s) used

- CPU and RAM

- GPU and vRAM

- Resolution of your Comp

- Resolution and codec of the footage used

- etc.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Explorer ,
Dec 24, 2019 Dec 24, 2019

does it have any reason if i am comparing 2 apps with each other?

ok source is mxf files, output prores hq both 4k

win10

both apps last versions

3950x 64gb ram

2080 super 8gb

4k, but this doesn't matter because if it will be 1080 it will be the same difference 4 times faster in premiere

 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Dec 24, 2019 Dec 24, 2019

MXF is not a codec, but a wrapper, but let's not get into that discussion.

What I can tell you is that Pr, traditionally, has way better GPU performance then Ae. But Ae offers far more control. So if you do basic effect, like Lumetri, I'm not surprised Ae is slower.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Explorer ,
Dec 24, 2019 Dec 24, 2019
LATEST

ops sorry h264 422 10bit  from fs7

hm strange when i am exporting gpu load are slightly lower in pr.

And what about ame is it using premiere process or ae?

I know that ae has better control and it is useful, but why is it so slow. adobe software not utilizing hardware at all, i have 15-20 cpu load and 8-13 gpu load(

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines