Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hello. I have hundreds of layers with a very specific opacity flicker on them. I have linked them to a 10 master nulls that have opacity key frames on them. To get variation and avoid repitition. The reason for linking to the nulls is to avoid lots of re-editing in the future. With hundres of layer you can't keep editing every set of keyframes.
The problem is I need another way to fade out each layer in a side ways wipe/wave. (and keep it flickering) As if I had another opacity which isn't overiden by the the exhisting opacity. I have found that just adding a mask can achive the same result, but I can only add a mask one at a time on each layer. Which is very slow and labour intensive. Is there away of having two opacity controls on a layer?
I have tried using expressions, even though they are good they seem to lack control an fidelity with easing.
Thank you 🙂
Julian
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Pre-compose, apply the mask or whatever effect in the parent comp.
Mylenium
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thank you for the reply. I need the layers to be separt layers and have individual opacities so I can flicker and also fade them out.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Have you tried the Transform effect? That has all the layer property controls, including opacity.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thank you. Tranform it does work as a double transparency.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Here's the hierarchy for opacity. Every control you add below the first one adds to the value of the previous control. Opacity is subtractive, so if you set opacity to 70% with the first control on the list, you can't increase it by adding value with the next one down the list.
If you want to just flicker the opacity using an expression, then you want to keyframe the opacity to fade out the entire layer try using an expression that adds the flickering expression to the value of the mask.
Something like this would work:
value + effect("Opacity")("Slider");
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thank you Rich. Yes, I realised the order was wrong was wrong, and it would make sense to do it this way.
Find more inspiration, events, and resources on the new Adobe Community
Explore Now