• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
533

GPU should be used more especially when using shape in animations.

Adobe Employee ,
Sep 28, 2022 Sep 28, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

GPU should be used more especially when using shape in animations.

GPU utilization too low while working.I want you to use about 80% of the whole.


GPUの使用率が低すぎるので70~80%ぐらいは常に使う様に処理を改善して欲しい。現状ではかなり使用率が低すぎる。
Idea No status
TOPICS
Performance

Views

332

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
20 Comments
Community Beginner ,
Sep 28, 2022 Sep 28, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

GPU AND MULTI-THREADED!

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Sep 28, 2022 Sep 28, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

GPUの使用ですが、標準のプラグインは全て最適化されることも望みます

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
New Here ,
Sep 28, 2022 Sep 28, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

これは賛同せざる得ないです...

WE NEED MORE GPU POWERRRRRRRRRR

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
New Here ,
Sep 28, 2022 Sep 28, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

この案件は結構諸刃の剣の可能性が高いので、できればユーザーがGPUの使用率を決められるようにしてもらうようにした方が良いと思います。
各々の環境が千差万別である事を念頭に置かなければならないので、一方的に決めるよりもユーザーが決められるようになる方が望ましいと思います。

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
New Here ,
Sep 28, 2022 Sep 28, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

GPUフル稼働とはいかなくても、現状より改善して欲しい

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Sep 28, 2022 Sep 28, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

(English content again)

GPU process should be used more efficiently when using shape in animations.

GPU utilization is too low while working.We strongly request you to keep using at least 80% of the whole process.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
New Here ,
Sep 28, 2022 Sep 28, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I too would like to see more GPU utilization when working in a 3D space.

I also think of you're going to use the CPU, you should really make multi threading work for multi core CPUs.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Engaged ,
Sep 28, 2022 Sep 28, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I have recently been learning about Adobe’s poor support of GPU, especially on MacBooks using external GPUs. This whole situation is ridiculous and adobe needs to answer explicitly what they’re going to do.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Enthusiast ,
Sep 28, 2022 Sep 28, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

How many votes before Adobe deigns to communicate with us plebes?

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Participant ,
Sep 28, 2022 Sep 28, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I have a MackBook Pro (2018 i9, 32M, 1TB SSD) and a BlackMagic eGPU (560 Radeon), connected through TB3, and I can't tell you: After Effects ignores all of it. The AE is eGPU enabled, the RAM shared is 27GB and the sracth disk (SSD) has 600GB. However, the app doesn't matter about all of this, specially when there are audiotracks or short footage clips along the timeline. Preview sucks and it takes too longo to work on a couple of frames.

It is very disappointing. What is it happening here?

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
New Here ,
Sep 28, 2022 Sep 28, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Absolutely, Davinci Fusion utilizes nit well, I'm going to switch over soon!

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
New Here ,
Sep 28, 2022 Sep 28, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

If you add just one effect that uses cpu in your composition the whole project will be rendered on the cpu. The gpu support (like the one in media encoder and premiere) is usefull only if you avoid any effects/plugins(and whatnot) that use cpu.

So for example if you render a video in 4k with nothing on it but a lumetri you will have like 1 sec of render /minute of footage and will use the gpu. But if you add something like a threshold you will get 10minutes of render/minute of footage and will use the cpu.

Also there is not much documentation on what uses what(what effects go on cpu what goes on gpu) that would help quite alot...

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Engaged ,
Sep 28, 2022 Sep 28, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

- post nuked -

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Explorer ,
Sep 28, 2022 Sep 28, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Agreed. But I'd be happy if it even utilised my CPU properly.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
New Here ,
Sep 28, 2022 Sep 28, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Super slow render useing shape layers with Master Properties and .csv file.
i7-6950X 10C-20T useing only one core to render and 1080ti at 2%

Attaching Project file!

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Explorer ,
Sep 28, 2022 Sep 28, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

对于多线程的兼容一直不好。我现在是16c。5700xt

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Explorer ,
Sep 28, 2022 Sep 28, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

So long Adobe...

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Engaged ,
Oct 16, 2022 Oct 16, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

o7
you will be missed. (not by adobe, mind you. maybe that's a relief.)

I'm here while the export takes 45 minutes on footage that took 6 minutes in CS6. how has it gotten so bad?

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Enthusiast ,
Jul 26, 2023 Jul 26, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I was considering upgrading my rig to a 4090, bcause I've heard its a monster card. Once I started looking into it I realized there was no point. 

 

Adobe this is how you use a GPU:

 

pic_disp.jpg

Meanwhile AE, every GPU within the margin of error:

pic_disp (2).jpg

 

Premiere also content to just leave the 1600$ basically GPU idle:

 

pic_disp (1).jpg

 

Not an Apple to Apples comparison, I get it, but to illustrate how much more powerful this GPU is and now much Adobe is leaving on the table, and how of our much time they are wasting by not rendering things as fast as they could:

 

pic_disp (3).jpg

 Adobe its 2023. "Mercury Playback" is 13 years old. It's almost old enough to drive. Based on how often things crash maybe don't let it drive. Time to give us Mercury 2.0. I think you've milked the Iradias purchase enough. Maybe buy Blackmagic and steal their code? Seems like the only way to get new features from Adobe half the time is if they decide to purchase another company. 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Enthusiast ,
Jul 26, 2023 Jul 26, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

do-something-comeon.gif

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report