Connect with our global Camera Raw Community.
Recently active
Lens Profiles apply to Camera Raw, Lightroom Classic, and the Lightroom Ecosystem products (Desktop, Mobile, and Web). Lens Profiles are available for a wide array of lenses. Not every lens is currently profiled, and of those profiled, not all are profiled for all camera and file types. For example, there may be a profile for a particular lens and camera mount for the raw file but not for the JPEG. Normally, profiles for JPEG are not supplied unless the camera does not apply a correction (e.g. iPhone, GoPro). A complete list of profiled lenses can be found here: https://helpx.adobe.com/camera-raw/kb/supported-lenses.html other helpful info: https://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/multi/lens-profile-support.html#Supported_lenses Lens correction for all Micro 4/3 (MFT) lenses and many newer cameras, including Panasonic and Olympus cameras, and other cameras (including Fuji X, Leica Q, and Nikon Z series)plus many point-and-shoot models from Ca
For a complete overview of camera support in Photoshop and Lightroom, visit the following article:Why doesn't my version of Photoshop or Lightroom support my camera? Make sure your version of Photoshop or Lightroom is updated for the latest camera support. If you own an older version of Photoshop or Lightroom, Adobe provides backward compatibility for the latest cameras through the FREE Adobe DNG Converter. Note: ETAs for specific cameras are not available.
Camera-matching Profiles are applicable to Camera Raw, Lightroom Classic, and the Lightroom Ecosystem products (Desktop, Mobile, and Web).Note: Not all cameras will receive camera-matching profiles. This thread is a place to request missing camera-matching profiles for specific models. Please include a complete camera model designation and a list of the specific camera-matching profiles you are requesting in your request. If your camera is already listed in this thread, please reply to the specific camera’s post rather than just posting in-line. Camera-matching profiles are provided for some camera manufacturers and models. As raw support is added for individual camera models, camera-matching profiles for some cameras may be added when raw support is initially offered. Other cameras may see camera-matching profiles added at a later date. It is also possible that a specific camera may see a long delay or perhaps not ever receive a specific camera-matching p
The August 2026 release of Camera Raw (v18.5) introduces powerful new retouching capabilities, expanded control over AI-powered features, and enhanced Vectorscope. Whether you're refining portraits, managing AI-assisted workflows, or performing precise color grading, this release gives you greater flexibility and control throughout your editing process. What’s NewOne of the headline additions in Camera Raw v18.5 is the new AI-powered Remove Blemishes from a Photo feature, which automatically detects and removes skin blemishes, moles, freckles, and other facial marks. You remain in control with adjustable Amount and Fade sliders, and can fine-tune individual corrections by removing or restoring specific spots as needed.For users who prefer a more traditional editing experience, Camera Raw now lets you manage generative AI features directly from the Preferences dialog. Features such as Generative Remove, Generative Expand, and Distraction People Removal can be enabled or disabled based o
The July 2026 update to Camera Raw (v18.4.1) pairs the creative power of Generative Expand with a new Fullscreen Presentation mode for showcasing your work and a new autofocus points overlay for supported raw files. What’s NewCamera Raw (v18.4.1) gives photographers more creative range and a smoother workflow. Generative Expand is ready whenever you need it, letting you extend your photo's canvas and fill the new areas with content that blends naturally with the original image. The new Full screen presentation mode lets you showcase/ review your photos in a focused manner, move through them with the arrow keys, and right-click to customize the background color and layout. A new autofocus points overlay shows your camera's focus points directly on the photo preview for supported Canon, Nikon, and Sony raw files, so you can check focus at capture time without affecting your edits or the file's metadata. This release also adds support for new lenses.Learn more about the latest updates her
When presented with a New Post screen in the Adobe Community, you are given three options for Conversation Type: Discussion, Bug, and Idea. If you were searching in Discussions, the New Post window will default to Discussions. If you are searching in Bugs, the New Post window will default to Bugs and likewise for Ideas. Many customers instinctually report problems they are experiencing as “Bugs”. It is natural to think that a problem you are having might be a bug. A bug is defined, for our purposes, as “something in the software that is not functioning as it was designed to function”. Interpreting whether a behavior is a bug or not is not always easy, however. Here are some reasons why you might want to consider posting first to Discussions rather than jumping straight to reporting in Bugs: Most items reported as Bugs are not actual bugs. In a typical group of reported bugs, only about 3 out of 25* bugs reported turn out to be actual bugs. Of those, typically 2 ou
Adobe is excited to receive requests for additional features you need to enhance your workflow. What can you do to increase the chances of being heard? Don't use the words "Feature Request" in your post's title. Search for and add to existing feature requests rather than creating duplicates. There is no advantage to creating a second request for any existing feature request. One request per thread!When creating an Idea or Feature Request thread, please keep requests for features to ONE request per thread. Doing this will allow others to vote on a single, specific feature and not confuse Upvotes amongst a list of feature requests. If an Idea thread has multiple requests in it, a moderator may ask you to split the multiple requests up into multiple threads so others can vote. In the event there remain multiple requests on a thread, the first item requested will be the arbiter of where the thread will be cross-referenced or merged. Describe how the featu
Bugs should only be reported for the latest or current version of Camera Raw. If you believe you have a bug it must be verified on the latest version of Camera Raw. New bug reports will not be accepted for older versions of the software. If you believe you have encountered a bug, it is important to first search the existing bugs to see if your issue and a possible solution or workaround have already been reported. If so, please add to that thread. If not, it may be prudent to start a new thread.Greater than 90% of the bugs reported are not actually bugs. Before starting a new thread, please read:P: Do I post in Discussions or Bugs? When logging a new bug report, it's required by the Camera Raw team for the information in the report to include steps to reproduce the bug experience. Once we can reproduce an issue, then we can start to investigate a fix. Bug reports without reproduction steps will be moved to discussions.If, after some troubleshooting, we find
When reviewing and culling photos in Adobe Camera Raw, the counter displayed at the top of the interface always shows the original number of loaded images, even after some of them have been marked for deletion.For example:Load 100 images Mark 25 images for deletion The counter still shows 1 of 100This makes it difficult to see how many images will actually remain after the culling process.I would like the item counter to reflect images that have been marked for deletion, or at least display that information in real time.For example:DSC_XXXX.NEF (1 of 100 • 25 marked for deletion)This small UI improvement would make the culling workflow much clearer, especially when reviewing hundreds or thousands of photos. Users could immediately see how many images are pending deletion without having to keep track mentally or wait until the files are actually deleted.The attached screenshot shows the current counter, which could be enhanced to provide this additional information. Thanks!
Lightroom Classic version: 15.4.1 [ 202606201310-b9f148a4 ] Operating system: Mac OS 26 Version: 26.5.2 [25F84] Computer: Mac Studio M4 Max Camera: Canon R5 Mark III noticed that in some photos enabling Denoise results in a checkeboard-like pattern, there are very distinct tiles. This is shown in the following photo:Checker BoardI exported a catalog with the above photo including the edit history that demonstrates the issue. I couldn’t attach it as it’s ~100MB, instead I uploaded it to google drive: Exported Catalog with the above photo
It seems like selection zoom has been removed entirely. I mean, seriously? Whose bright idea was this? I HATE scrubby zoom, and don't want to be forced to use it.
This is the kind of message I get from version 18.4.1 to version 18.5.0 when I launch the module from Photoshop.
Updated on July 7th, 2026.This post is to collect in-app customer feedback on the Generative Expand feature in Camera Raw. Generative Expand seamlessly blends the edges of your existing image with newly generated content that naturally fits into the background without taking away from your photo’s original subject. Some use cases for Generative Expand are: Expand the canvas for images that were accidentally cropped Fill in the edges of Geometry Edits Adjust the aspect ratio of a photo for social media We'd love to hear what it does well, what it doesn't, and how you'd like it to work. Please also include the following details in your post: Camera Raw version System details Example image(s) if you wish to share Our team continually monitors this thread. Thanks!Thanks!Peter Baust - Dir, Product ManagementPosted by: Rikk Flohr
Camera Raw 18.4 should include a preference to return automatically to "Fit in View" after crop operations. Earlier workflows were faster because the image always returned to the full-screen view after validating a crop. Please add a user preference to choose between preserving zoom level and returning to Fit in View.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Telephoto DNG is not correctly identified by Camera RawEnvironmentAdobe Camera Raw / Lightroom Classic 15.4.1 Xiaomi 17 Ultra Native DNG files captured directly by the phoneSummaryThe Telephoto camera of the Xiaomi 17 Ultra appears not to be identified correctly by Camera Raw.This causes two independent features to fail:Automatic Lens Profile matching. Automatic DCP camera profile matching.The Wide and Ultra Wide cameras of the same device work correctly.Steps to reproduceOpen a native DNG captured with the Wide camera. The correct Adobe Lens Profile is automatically selected. A custom DCP profile whose UniqueCameraModel matches the DNG is correctly listed and can be selected. Open a native DNG captured with the Ultra Wide camera. Same correct behaviour. Open a native DNG captured with the Telephoto camera. No Lens Profile is automatically selected, although the correct profile exists and can be selected manually. A custom DCP profile with the matching UniqueCameraM
Every time I try to edit raw NEF files from my Nikon camera, camera raw feels unusable. It is so slow and feels like it is going crash or freeze.Looking at other users, these issues are continuous, going back 6 years plus.I was getting so frustrated that I spent a lot of money on a new PC. and its no better.Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-14700 (2.10 GHz)Installed RAM 32.0 GB (31.8 GB usable)Graphics card AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT (16 GB)Storage 277 GB of 2.73 TB usedSystem type 64-bit operating system, x64-based processor Camera Raw 18 what is going on?
Announcing a new feature now in Adobe Camera Raw (17.2) – Removal of Distracting PeopleUnder the Remove dialog, under Distraction Removal, we have added an item called “People”. This feature supports faster and easier detection and removal of distracting people in an image. It is offered as a Tech Preview in the Adobe Camera Raw Plugin-only and is available now. Please try it out and let us know what works well, what doesn’t work well, and anything that might improve the experience. Thank you! Peter Baust - Dir, Product Management Posted by Rikk Flohr
Adobe Camera Raw 18.5This problem occurs on both Nikon D850 and D500 raw files which have been opened in ACR by right clicking on the files in the Mac finder and selecting open in photoshop. The files have not been previously processed in any way.When I right click on the image in Camera Raw, the option for “Show Autofocus Points” is greyed out and not responsive. I have repeated this with multiple files from both cameras taken using different autofocus modes.I have checked two of the files (one D500, and one D850) in Raw Digger to examine the EXIF data, and both show values for “Focus Position” (0x11 on a D500 file) and “AF Points in Focus” (E9 on the same file), so this metadata information should be available to Camera Raw.Are these cameras supposed to be supported by this feature? Adobe’s documentation says nothing about what cameras are supported.I watched a video today showing someone using this feature (although with a different camera’s files), so I know that I was looking a
I have a 100 year old photo that was oil painted and framed in an oval with bowed glass. I tried very hard to light it without having a reflection of the light in the photo, but because the glass is bowed, I still had some reflections. The distraction remove tool, even at Best quality, doesn’t seem to do much. Honestly, I can’t see any significant different between before and after. Before distraction removalAfter distraction removal at BestYes, I realize the image is dark, but I thought I would brighten it after removing the glare. Any ideas? Is this tool not going to work on bowed glass?
Przydała by sie funkcja Koło barw taka podobna jak
Hello Adobe Team,In a series of identical tripod shots, a manually created mask does not synchronize correctly.When I copy the mask to a single image, it is positioned correctly. When I synchronize it to multiple images simultaneously, the mask appears shifted—even though the camera, subject, framing, and image dimensions remain unchanged. Is this a known issue?Thanks - Michael
This post applies to Camera Raw. Lightroom Classic and Lightroom Ecosystem feedback can be found here. Previous Early Access Feedback can be found here. Generative Remove makes it easier to remove unwanted objects and distractions with a simple gesture, even on complex backgrounds. For more accurate results, be sure to include the object's shadow in your selection and/or expand its size. Detect Objects uses AI to find the objects underneath a brushed area. The masked areas will now appear larger than the Early Access version of this feature. You can also circle objects for quicker selection now. We have also updated the spot selection experience to make it easier to manage variations, switch the fill type, refine the selection area, or re-generate as needed. Batch updating is also now supported for Generative Remove spots. As Generative AI analyzes portions of the image that have been cropped out, Camera Raw has the ability to tog
In Camera Raw, it would be nice to have more precision in the Geometry tab when you want to shift an image along the X or Y axis. Using the slider to the right or left with a mouse isn't precise at all. Ideally, you should be able to increment the values by +0.1 or -0.1 using the <- or -> keys on the keyboard.The “Constrain to Image” checkbox should also be moved back to where it used to be, right next to the Magnifying Glass checkbox. Since the latest version, you have to right-click on the photo and select “Constrain to Image,” which is sometimes grayed out even though it should be active. This is truly an incomprehensible regression.
It seems the “guidelines” warning is back in Camera Raw after having been absent for quite a while. Today, simply trying to remove the edge of a wall in an image generated the “this doesn’t fit in the guidelines” warning message that I haven’t seen in Camera for over a year now. I realize that perhsp I hadn’t conisdered the wall’s feelings about being removed from the final image, but in all seriousness, removing things like softbox edges and other minor background intrusions seems to be exactly what these sort of tools can make short work of. Please have a look and see if the guidelines can be adjusted to be more useful. I can easily go fix this in PS and will, but something simple like this shouldn’t require a trip to PS.
SummaryPanorama Merge with Perspective projection anchors the output projection plane on the first image in filmstrip sort order. The geometry of the merged panorama therefore changes when only the filenames change, with identical pixel data, EXIF and capture times.EnvironmentCamera Raw 18.4.1, macOS 14.8.7, Sony SLT-A77, 3 frames shot right to left.Steps to reproduceSelect the 3 frames, Merge to Panorama, Perspective, Boundary Warp 0, Auto Crop off. Repeat twice, renaming the files so that the centre frame, then the left frame, sorts first.Actual resultThree different output geometries.Case 1 - Right image first.Case 2 - Center image first.Case 3 - Left image first.Cases 1 and 3 are exact mirror images of each other, indicating the output plane is aligned with the optical axis of whichever frame sorts first, with no re-centring applied.Expected resultOutput geometry depends only on image content, not on filenames.Suggested fixDerive the output plane orientation from the estimated came
Remix with Firefly Community Gallery
Thousands of free creations to fall in love with and remix in Firefly.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.