Skip to main content
SPfoto
Known Participant
April 4, 2025
質問

Adobe is very strange now with quality rejections.

  • April 4, 2025
  • 返信数 7.
  • 2407 ビュー

I really don't understand are rejection reasons real or just "fake" cause they need some reasons to reject photos.

I'm a stock photographer for 18 yeas and I'm doing my work on Sony A1 with best prime lenses. So quality can't be a problem. If Adobe reject images with reasons "not for stock" or "too similar" or "wrong keywords" no problem I could understand this and think where is a problem on my side. But quality can't be a problem for this example image and many others. All other stocks are 99% accept these images.

So very strange rejections, very strange new Adobe review process. As an example one image and 100% crop. No noise, no aberrations, no under or over expose, no problem. Wheel is in focus and in descriptions I wrote that this is car drive concept, not just regular landscape, so focus should be on car, on wheel.

返信数 7

robertm49297337
Inspiring
June 25, 2025

I submit about ten AI images per day (don't be mad, I spend a lot of time on them). More than half of them get rejected, and about half of those are for "too similiar". Because Adobe can handle 30,000 blue gradient backgrounds, but that single surreal image of ships trapped inside glass boxes at the bottom of the ocean is "too similiar". (You may not like the image, but it wasn't rejected for quality.)

Another example: a very specific metaphor for a finanical crisis, a bear and a bull hugging each other in support, looking depressed. Yes, there are many pictures using the bear and bull symbols, but none of them have used this particular metaphor. It seems very much like an AI said, "bear, bull, market charts: similar". 

Here's a very simple image of a model posing in a white dress with her arms up. If you do a "find similar" search using this image, 33,877,521 images come up. I suppose they're all similiar in the sense that...some of them have women in sleeveless tops or dresses. Maybe a third of them have their arms up. None of them have the same dress on or exactly the same look. None of them have her hands curling in that exact elegant way. How did Adobe deside that the 33,877,522nd picture of "woman with/without sleeveless top with/without short hair lifting/not lifting her hands in front of a beige backdrop" was too many? It seems entirely arbitrary.

The last one actually got rejected for quality issues. It's an impresssionistic style illustion of foxes, rejected for quality. I've scoured the image. Is it the way their bodies fade into darkness with blueish frost? Is it the way their whiskers are rendered. Both of those look cool to me and fall into the territory of artistic choices. Adobe seems to be rejecting images on matters of aesthetic taste.

Anyway, sorry for the rant. Just wanted to share. Any useful feeback appreciated.



Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Community Expert
June 25, 2025

@robertm49297337 

You've gone off-topic. This topic is about 'Quality,' not 'Similar Content' rejections. 

Please stick to the original topic or start a new one. 

 

Examine your keywords in Stock inventory. I suspect that keywords may trigger the bot to think that there's already too much 'Similar Content' in Stock.  Chose other keywords that are less triggering and resubmit.

 

 

 

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
robertm49297337
Inspiring
June 25, 2025
The image of the two foxes was a quality issue.
Known Participant
May 9, 2025

Another one joining this thread. As I've said in other posts, until things get cleared up, I've stopped uploading images here and have signed up for Alamy along with my usual agencies (Shutterstock and iStock).

By the way, I remember that this started for me a few months ago, and I debated on this forum with some people who signed as "volunteers" that this was an AI (I would upload a batch of about 20 photos, and within 2 or 3 seconds they would be rejected for clearly "false" reasons, and others in that batch would take a month or more to be reviewed). They denied it and even told me to improve my images and my technique and update my equipment (with more than 15,000 accepted), and today I'm reading that it's happening to them too. It's just life!!!
Regards
Jose Luis

https://stock.adobe.com/es/contributor/205079068/josevgluis
Participant
May 9, 2025

Yes, it happened to me as well, I submitted 10 photos and got rejected 10 photos in a few minutes, the other time I sent 11 photos and got accepted only 1 photo,with rejected quality issued is very annoying but on the Shutterstock my photos were approved 💯 percent, with rejected quality issued is very annoying 

Ricky336
Community Expert
Community Expert
April 5, 2025

Hello,

Perhaps this is a small thing, and maybe not.

I think the photos could be lightened up a bit. There is a lot of light reflection coming off the snow, so this has to be taken into account.  

So, maybe increase exposure a bit and tweak the white balance.

Perhaps something like this:

 

 

SPfoto
SPfoto作成者
Known Participant
April 5, 2025

Stock photography is not art gallery, plus-minus 5% in exposure or WB is not a thing that could result in rejection. If we apply this rules to all of 500 millions of photos in stock, then we should remove about 99% of photos from stocks. Cause slight exposure and WB difference is a personal preference, photography is art not just numbers. Anyway my claim to Adobe is that they write very general "quality issue". This could be a lot of things like exposure, focus, noise, WB and many others. May be reviewer thinks that problem is not in WB, may be he thinks that shadows are too deep, too dark, I don't know. My cliam is if Adobe apply more and more strict rules, then Adobe should explain why photo was rejected. Gambling with Adobe reviewers is not what I like, just tell why exactly photo was rejected, and no problem, no new messages will be on this forum.

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
April 5, 2025

"Anyway my claim to Adobe is that they write very general "quality issue". This could be a lot of things like exposure, focus, noise, WB and many others."

 

This is how things work with Adobe Stock and that is not going to change anytime in the near (or far) future. Rejected assets can be uploaded here and contributors will try their best to determine what might be the reason for rejection. Moderators view thousands of images per day and probably only have a few seconds to determine if an asset should be rejected or accepted. They do not have time to give a specific reason (or multiple reasons) why an image was rejected. Welcome to Adobe Stock. 😉

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
RALPH_L
Community Expert
Community Expert
April 4, 2025

I looked at both photos and checked the histograms and I have to agree with you. These photos should have been accepted.

Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
April 4, 2025

I submit only photographs and for many years now have maintained a rejection rate of less than 5%. But my year-to-date rejection rate has shot up to 40%. I also shoot with high-end professional equipment and carefully edit each image prior to submission. AI Contributors are also reporting higher rejection rates, particularly for "similars". Adobe has remained silent on what changes they've implemented to the reviewing process. I'm going to stop uploading any new work until we gain some clarity about these changes. Meanwhile, I'll start feeding my Getty account again, which I've neglected for quite a while.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
yamato713108855
Community Expert
Community Expert
April 4, 2025

Calm down a bit and read the previous threads.
There are many similar threads.
You are not the only one experiencing this problem.

SPfoto
SPfoto作成者
Known Participant
April 4, 2025

I'm calm and relaxed. )

But becase Adobe don't give "submit to another second reviewer" button, the only thing is to write here.

 

But I'm not calm because I read groups of stock AI creators, how people generate and upload 500 images in one day. Where is AI and where is quality? I create about 10 images a day and still Adobe thinks that it's not enough quality. If it's not enough may be Adobe just need to delete all AI generated images from database? Cause they are not even close to the quality of real camera photos.