ALsp wrote: <opinion> CS6 is actually our version of choice. Far better, less useless features. Fluid Grids is easier to ignore than Bootstrap. The CSS panel is far better, and it's simply a more stable tool. </opinions> each to their own, I like horse riding but I wouldn't try to use them in a transport business. ... View more

Liam Dilley wrote: Thats not core BC. And to disrespect BC but you do know the Admin has pretty much always been able to run in HTTPS? When BC stored credit card details early in its life you had to go into HTTPS URL version to view them and when in there the admin 98% worked. Changes adobe made less worked when they took over and some things like the editor and links being worldsecure and not the default etc were in place. With open platform as they made that sandboxed and more secure BC actually switched to HTTPS in admin some time ago. They just did not fix the few elements that did not work properly under it. All the recent work and announcement stuff is really not much work going on at all. yes I know and yes Adobe could wake up and do more but you asked for a link for what's happening and there are more then one message at that blog... what is it you want to know? ... View more

Maingloe2ElectricBoogaloo wrote: Just curious, How do you know that, "Business Catalyst is currently working on core of BC"? Could you please post a link to any supporting information that you have? Site administration through HTTPs for new sites ... View more

Maingloe2ElectricBoogaloo wrote: It seems to me that all the help info is very outdated for Business Catalyst. Even the videos on BC Gurus is very old. ALL in all, it doesn't seem like there is much investment into the future of Business Catalyst. It seems like an awesome platform but I am not sure if I should waste precious time and resources into something that Adobe isn't willing to put their time and resources into. Any thoughts? are you talking about BC (as in world secure systems) that is the server which EVERYTHING Adobe runs on? the BC app for dreamweaver was dropped because Adobe didn't want to hire anyone to look after it and BC Gurus is not "up to date" with a lot of their suff because thats not what they are about. ... View more

yes the internet changed and some of us can't keep up... you can still download Microsoft Frontpage for your web sites. Have fun. ... View more

forcing help videos at start up (even when the system will not play them)? a reset option but no off buttion? ... View more

Nancy O. wrote: When I see Muse and Clients used in the same sentence, I shudder a little.  Here's why: I had a prospective client show me the web site her former "web designer" created.  It was a poorly conceived Muse site.  The client was unable to edit it and wanted much, much more so she came to me for improvements. Given the long inventory of features the client requested from the start, MU was definitely not the right tool for this project. Mind you, I am not putting blame on Muse.  I lay blame entirely on a clueless, so-called "web designer" who made some very foolish choices.   But here's the thing.  All that "ease of use" that MU provides is a double-edged sword.  It empowered this inexperienced, non-coder into thinking they had all the right tools (and talent) to build and SELL professional websites.  YIKES!   It takes a lot more than tools to build good websites. I can forgive the mistakes people make when building sites for personal/hobby use.  Afterall, that's the target MU user and it's their cross to bear if the website stinks.  But it's unforgivable when people sell dreck to unsuspecting clients.   Suffice it to say, the site I looked at had to be tossed out & rebuilt from ground up.  The client was none too happy to hear their first website investment had been all for naught. Now you understand why I have an aversion to web designer's who use MU for client projects.  I'm sure some very talented designers can do amazing things with MU. But for me, it signals a red flag that something important is missing from their minimum skill-set otherwise they wouldn't be using MU. Just my 2 cents. Nancy O. I can see a 50|50 but in your eyes the client was totally innocent and had no part in allowing that scenario to happen? I've seen my share of bad sites both Muse and DW… hell I'm old enough to remember the good old days of Frontpage but I love seeing people like gizerd discover websites that they would have never attempted with DW so Muse is staying around and that’s a good thing. ------ Muse vs Dreameaver is the wrong approach imo… it's Muse & Dreameaver that has a future if Adobe can make it happen before someone else builds it instead. ... View more