Skip to main content

Filter by idea status

10000+ Ideas

sarzyParticipant

Histogram Preview for Selected Image in Adobe BridgeOpen for Voting

Description:As a frequent user of Adobe Bridge, I often review large batches of images taken in variable lighting conditions. A key part of my workflow is quickly identifying and rejecting photos that are either underexposed, overexposed, or lacking in color information. These tasks are best informed by viewing a histogram. However, Bridge currently does not display a histogram for selected images unless they are first opened in Camera Raw or another editor, adding unnecessary steps and time to the culling process.Proposed Feature:Add a real-time histogram preview for the currently selected image directly within the Bridge interface, e.g. in the Preview or Metadata panel. This feature would allow users to instantly see the distribution of tonal and color information, enabling much faster and more objective image culling without leaving Bridge or engaging in manual edits first.Benefits:Streamlines workflow: Quickly assess exposure and color balance without opening each image individually.Improves accuracy: Make more objective decisions about which photos to reject or keep, especially in variable lighting situations.Saves time: Reduces the need for round-tripping images between Bridge and editing apps just to check basic exposure data.Consistent with user needs: Similar features exist in Lightroom and Photoshop, and users have repeatedly requested this for Bridge (see prior discussions here, here, and here).Summary:Integrating a histogram preview directly into Adobe Bridge would make it a much more powerful and efficient tool for photographers and editors managing large photo libraries, particularly when exposure and color consistency are critical.

swrutherford
swrutherfordInspiring

Add a "Save as Preset" option to the output settings dialog box in After EffectsOpen for Voting

After Effects:Currently, to create a “template” in Output Settings, you click the drop down next to the Output Module and select “Make Template...”Options Presented When Clicking the Output Module settings in the Render Queue in After Effects ...then have to select “Edit” from the middle of the screen…Output Module Templates Dialog Box, Creating a New Template And then you can edit your settings. Output Module Settings Dialog Box This is the same dialog box that can be accessed by simply clicking the queued item’s Output Module Settings in the Render Queue:Queued Composition in Render Queue I believe it would be beneficial to have a “Save as Preset” or “Save as Output Module Template” button on the Output Module Settings page like Photoshop has on their “New Document” dialog box: Photoshop “New Document” Dialog Box - “Save as Preset” OptionHaving the option on the Output Module Settings dialog box would speed up the creation of templates/presets since it can reduce clicks overall. Also, no matter how I end up at this dialog box, I can still save the template/preset if I access these settings by clicking in the Render Queue (i.e. - I would not have to “back out” of the Output Module Settings dialog box just to reload the same box from a different path). It’s a small change, but could be beneficial for streamlining workflows when you often need to create new templates for clients. Thank you for your consideration.

AI-Enhanced 3D Camera Tracker (Adobe Sensei Integration)Open for Voting

Hi Adobe team, I’d love to see a major update to the 3D Camera Tracker in After Effects — something that brings it up to modern AI standards and makes it a truly intelligent scene analysis tool instead of just a point solver.Right now, the 3D Camera Tracker works, but it still feels very manual and outdated comparatively. We get tracking points and a solved camera, but we still have to figure out ground planes, scale,         object anchoring, occlusion, and scene layout ourselves.What I want to see is an AI-enhanced version of the 3D Camera Tracker powered by Sensei.   Something that understands the scene, not just tracks it.What This Could Look Like1. Context-Aware Auto Camera Solve AI-assisted solve that distinguishes between static and dynamic objects Better drift prevention by ignoring moving people, cars, etc. Real-time confidence feedback so we know if a solve is solid 2. Automatic Ground & Room Detection Auto floor detection and proper world orientation Basic room building (floor + walls from detected planes) Scene scale estimation This alone would save a ton of manual setup time.3. Full Scene Depth & Dense Reconstruction Optional full-scene Z-depth scan AI-generated depth map layer Dense point cloud or lightweight mesh generation Even experimental Gaussian splat-style scanning for better object placement This would dramatically improve occlusion and 3D compositing inside AE.4. Object-Aware TrackingInstead of just random track points: Detect and label objects (person, desk, chair, vehicle, etc.) Allow tracking or stabilizing specific objects Generate 3D nulls attached to recognized objects Separate dynamic vs static elements automatically 5. Scene Graph / Structured Data Build a basic scene hierarchy (camera, ground, walls, objects) Allow us to attach elements to real-world objects instead of guessing track points 6. Lens Detection & Distortion Handling Auto-detect focal length Detect and correct lens distortion Match CG lens settings automatically 7. Modern Export Options Export camera, point cloud, depth maps, object tracks Clean export to C4D, Blender, Unreal, etc. Include semantic scene data Why This MattersAs a video creator, I spend a lot of time: Hunting for good track points Manually defining ground planes Fixing drift caused by moving objects Creating fake occlusion masks Guessing scale An AI-enhanced tracker would turn this into:Drop footage → Solve → Get a usable 3D scene.It would make After Effects feel years ahead of other compositing tools and remove a lot of friction from 3D integration.After Effects is already incredibly powerful. Updating the 3D Camera Tracker with Adobe Sensei would make it feel modern again and massively speed up real-world workflows.I’d love to see Adobe explore this direction.Thanks for considering it.

Jason PursellParticipating Frequently

Any idea on when some missing features will be added?Open for Voting

Hi,I'm a user who does mobile only editing for half the year (when I'm hiking, i only have a phone). As such, I had high hopes for this release, but I am underwhelmed. I'm sure that my expectations were too high, but I hoped for at least parity with Rush, since you've deprecated that. Having said that, the interface is nice and fluid, although there is some wasted space (even on the phone). It hasn't crashed on me like Rush did so that's good. The audio/music/voiceover/sound effects  features are really great and easy to use. The generate video from image feature is pretty darn cool i must say. I don't want to sound negative either and I do hope you have plans to expand the features. I'd be willing to pay for a subscription if it includes features on par with or surpassed those of Lumafusion. But currently I'm unsure if this is ultimately meant to compete with apps like Lumafusion (since you deprecated Rush) or if this is only meant for short and simple TikTok-like videos.  Some examples of features that I hope to see:1. More contol over clip fit, crop, position, size, scale, blending, and rotation. For example, the ability to Zoom in/out of a video clip. Rush only had this for still images. Being able to zoom in/out video (with control) would require the next item.2. keyframes. 3. effects4. adjustment layers5. double-tap in blank area of timeline to collapse/expand all clips to fit to horizontally in view. I understand this is not possible vertically. 6. ability to select multiple clips in the timeline for editing or dragging7. Finer control of Titles. Especially size and position. For example, the ability to Apply to All for text size and position. Currently we're just guessing with the haptics. Or even give us the ability to create a user generated template.8. Project settings. Everything seems to be preset by first imported clip, but there's no way to tell in the app. Only Aspect ratio is exposed to the user. Anyway, thank you for taking the time to read.