Build better products with our product team
This Adobe Firefly artboard is an enormous help for webtoon production. Please also make it possible to add speech bubble objects.
I would like an on system solution that does not use your servers or the internet. It would use local resources to index and search my graphic library. I have many terabytes of clip art, mainly vector, with some video and some photo assets. I want Adobe Bridge to sort and help manage these assets using an indexing tool similar to what Premiere Pro uses when you import videos and can search within them. When I navigate to a project or asset library folder, it should surface relevant content I am looking for. This way, instead of using AI to generate content, I can find content I have already created, including assets that were misplaced or stored in folders I did not realize they were in. Also, I would like to see an implementation where Bridge includes a project management system. If I am building assets for my main graphic library, I could mark them as general graphic library assets that are usable at any time. If I am building assets for a franchise, for example Subway, Taco Bell, or Del Taco, or any corporation I am working with, I could mark those as corporate or franchise assets so they remain associated with that company. I also sometimes create assets that are drilled down to a single local store. In that case, I could mark them as single customer assets so they are not used in searches outside of that specific client. When I am working on a customer, I could use something other than Collections to store assets for that client. The problem with Collections is that they sometimes get lost, or they become too heavy to open, forcing me to start over. Having an AI driven tool that understands what I already have, keeps me on brand, and allows me to store and retrieve assets aligned to a specific client, while still pulling from my main library when appropriate, would be extremely valuable. This would prevent me from wasting time searching elsewhere for assets I have already created.
When using the Sequence Index with "Update Timeline Selection" ticked, would it not be a good idea to allow the selection (in both the timeline and the index) to follow the Linked Selection toggle.I almost assumed this fucntionality would exist but it doesnt seem to. [Moved to ideas by mod]
Hi, I would like to suggest an evolution of Expression Controls and Pseudo Effects.Currently, the only way to attach custom, user-defined parameters to a layer is by relying on effects such as Expression Controls or Pseudo Effects. This approach has several limitations.Certain layer types do not support effects at all (cameras, lights, advanced 3D layers), and in other cases effects can cause rendering issues, especially with collapsed 3D compositions or 3D vector layers. From a scripting standpoint, defining custom controls is cumbersome, as Pseudo Effects cannot be generated or customized dynamically at creation time and require an external .ffx file as an intermediary.I would therefore like to suggest a new feature:Native custom properties integrated into the Properties panel.These custom properties would:be attached directly to the layer, independently of the Effects stackbe exposed and managed in the Properties panelsupport the same level of customization as Pseudo Effects or Essential Graphicsbe fully accessible in expressions as first-class propertiesbe created, queried, and modified via the scripting APIIntegrating custom properties into the Properties panel would, in my opinion, be a significant improvement to workflow and flexibility.Thank you!
To the Photoshop Development Team, I am writing to you as a professional Photoshop user to highlight a functional gap that I find critical for anyone managing large font libraries. Currently, Photoshop integrates fonts from the AppData\Roaming\Adobe\Fonts folder by mixing them indiscriminately with Windows system fonts in the "Your Fonts" panel. This makes testing new characters extremely difficult and time-consuming when dealing with hundreds or thousands of installed fonts. My Proposal: It would be immensely helpful to include a specific section or filter (similar to the existing ones for "Serif," "Adobe Fonts," etc.) that allows users to display only the fonts manually loaded into the local Adobe folder. In the current version (26.2), it is impossible to isolate these fonts as a group or bulk-add them to favorites after a search. This is because the system relies solely on internal metadata and does not provide a way to filter based on the source folder. I am certain this implementation would be enthusiastically received by a vast number of users who, like myself, require an isolated "test" area for their creative projects, separate from the clutter of system fonts. Do you have plans to improve local font management in upcoming releases of the software? I look forward to your response and thank you for your time and consideration. Best regards
Maybe this exists but I haven't found the functionality. I'm working on a doc that has hours of footage and I'm using markers to log everything. It's cumbersome now to listen to the clip and then add a marker and log it. I would love to be able to hit the marker button and type while I'm listening to the clip on the timeline in real time.
Currently AE will pop into the forground and take application focus whenever a render, project collect, or anything else is completed. This is extremely distracting since quite often AE is being used in tandem with other applications, and when AE pops into the foreground and takes mouse/keyboard focus it can break what is currently being worked on in other applications. It would be wonderful if there was an option to stop AE from popping into the foreground for any reason.Thank you!
We all know there is a bunch of things in Resolve that makes Resolve the leading choice for commercial production and for proffesional use with colorgrading. And I know if we only could get at least 50%. Most people would not switch. I know that there are a lot of young people who is getting into film making and when you have a free software that you could practice and master until you buy it is too tempting for most people. So why would they choose a software that is paid monthly and have less options? More and more people want to focus on film making and not just content, which makes Resolve a absolut attractive start.So what type of features whould change that view? What should Adobe adopt to become the Colorgraders choice?Just having Vectorscopes in curves would be a simple thing to start with.Depth map maybe?We are soon getting our own "Magic mask" which is a great start for not needing to jump between PP and AE. I'm just here throwing out ideas and discussions. Would rather have PP than Resolve for Colorgrade if I had the choice.
The Library is very limited in its functions, and often workarounds are required for tasks the Library should logically handle. My example - organizing and sharing swatches between apps. There are several workarounds available because the library doesn't support a clear, simple procedure. Yes, it CAN perform the task, but it is awkward and doesn't provide everything needed for this type of task. How many people actually use the Library over Bridge or other file management tools?
There are many effects that could benefit from a 'mask limiter' instead of using the mask as opacity. The issue with many effects is if you want to tastefully limit them the mask data should drive the effect rather than cut/fade it away. The most typical examples would be Mosaic or other blurs and lens flares. In DaVinci Resolve, if you add a mask input to certain effects the effect itself is limited rather than the result blended. Here you can see that a mask with no feather, the coverege against the mosaic resolution dictates contribution. As effect it reaches outside of the mask and doesn't become a cut off circle. Resolve: Premiere Pro: It would be really nice to have a mechanism for this with a switch button on the mask to tell whether you'd want it to affect the opacity or the effect itself.
In professional interior, real estate, and architectural photo editing, the most time-consuming task is correcting color casts and exposure inconsistencies on large interior surfaces.Current AI selections (Subject, Sky, Object) do not address this use case well.Requested AI masks:Select Walls (painted walls, excluding windows, doors, furniture)Select Floor (wood, tile, carpet, concrete)Select CeilingSelect Interior Surfaces (combined architectural surfaces)Use cases:Neutralizing color casts from mixed lightingMaintaining realistic but clean wall colorsFaster, more consistent batch editing
It would be great to be able to rearrange styles in the Style Browser! The Style Browser is such a useful feature!I’ve created many styles to work more efficiently,but unfortunately, I can’t freely move the style icons around within the browser.I’d love to be able to organize them by simply dragging and dropping with the mouse — just like in many other apps! スタイルブラウザーはとても便利だ! たくさんスタイルを作って効率的に使いたい! しかしながら、スタイルブラウザー内のスタイルアイコンは、任意の移動ができない。 よくあるような、マウス操作のドラッグで移動して、スタイルブラウザー内の整理をできるようにしてほしい!!!
I am needing to sort bins of footage for a docuseries shot over about 2 years. The footage was shot on cinema cameras, the filenames of which are often something like "A00#C00#_yymmdd##". It'd be super helpful to have the option to sort the source clips by Creation Date. The date would probably be the date we made the proxies, but that least that would get us in the ballpark. (We did transcode in DaVinci, can the bin be sorted by Tape Name?)
For the love of everything sacred, kindly implement folders for organizing audio files in an Audition Multitrack project. It's the only program in the professional suite that doesn't support this basic functionality. Please and thank you.Stephen
I work professionally with real estate and architectural photography, handling large volumes of bracketed exposures mixed with single images. My typical workflow is: Bracketed exposures are grouped into stacks in Lightroom Single images remain unstacked What is currently missing is a way to batch-send these images to Photoshop while preserving stack logic. Requested behavior: When selecting multiple images in Lightroom and choosing Edit as Layers in Photoshop: Each stack should open as a separate Photoshop document with its stack members as layers Each unstacked image should open as a separate single-layer document This would allow efficient HDR / exposure blending workflows without manual per-stack selection.
If you like this Idea, please upvote it!Imagine How it will be easy to navigate effects controls inside after effects if you could add colors to it!Just see by your eyes. it will make it very easy to manage many effects for a layer!
Please, PLEASE create a larger Generative AI Prompt field in Photoshop! A scalable option would be sufficient.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.