Skip to main content

Filter by idea status

10000+ Ideas

Back to top of the list
Epic_Auto school7375Participant

Add Encoding Options (UTF-8-BOM, UTF-16) for Marker Export to CSVOpen for Voting

Summary: I would like to request an update to the "Export > Markers" dialog that allows users to select the specific text encoding format for CSV files. Specifically, we need options for UTF-8 with BOM and UTF-16.The Problem: Currently, when exporting markers to CSV, Premiere Pro appears to export in standard UTF-8 without a Byte Order Mark (BOM).While this is standard for web use, it causes significant issues when opening the CSV files directly in Microsoft Excel (especially on Windows).Proposed Solution: In the "Export Markers" dialog box, please add a dropdown menu for "Encoding" next to the File Type selector.Desired Options:UTF-8 (Default)UTF-8 with BOM (Excel Friendly)UTF-16 LE/BEThis small change would save a massive amount of time for editors and assistants who rely on marker lists for deliverables, translation, and producer feedback.Thank you for considering this request!

2
Forum|Forum|9 months ago
maxspreenParticipant

Multiple (Project) Panel InstancesOpen for Voting

Especially with projects containing a lot of comps, navigating the project panel can be cumbersome – it results in endless scrolling up and down. Having multiple instances of the project panel scrolled to specific positions would make jumping between comps much easier. There are probably usecases for other panels beside the project panel as well.Bonus: Premiere Pro like behaviour where one can go into a bin/folder.

0
Forum|Forum|9 months ago
maxspreenParticipant

Tab Groups for CompsOpen for Voting

Chrome-Style Tabs for Comps: Grouping multiple open compositions into tabs at the top of the timeline window to reduce horizontal scrolling and clutter.

0
Forum|Forum|9 months ago
mediaeditor-abdulrahman

P: Adjustable Accuracy Levels for Face Recognition in Lightroom ClassicOpen for Voting

Lightroom Classic’s Face Recognition currently attempts to detect all faces in an image, including very small, blurred, distant, or partially visible faces. In photos with many people, this leads to slower processing, unnecessary detections, and extra manual cleanup—especially in large archives. I propose adding user-controlled accuracy levels for face recognition, such as: An accuracy/clarity slider to set a minimum face quality threshold Options to detect: Only clear and prominent faces Moderately clear faces Full detection (current behavior) Automatic exclusion of low-quality faces based on the selected level Benefits: Faster processing in large archives Fewer false or low-value detections Better accuracy and user control More efficient workflows for institutional, journalistic, and humanitarian users This enhancement would make Face Recognition more scalable and practical for professional, high-volume archives.

0
Forum|Forum|9 months ago
수지31599341f9q7Participant

Drag a number of magnetic film created by dragging several magnetic layersOpen for Voting

I think it's a really necessary feature.

1
Forum|Forum|9 months ago

Delete multiple anchor points at onceOpen for Voting

Specifically for Photoshop, when selecting multiple anchor points to delete, there must be a button on the 'Delete anchor point tool' options under Pen Tool to delete those selected points, or at least allow deleting them via the 'Delete' keyboard button without breaking the shape. So far, the only direct solution is to click 'Delete anchor point tool' and keep on deleting those anchor points one by one (but it sucks to do so on a very fragile and complicated shape with a ton of anchor points). This can be done in Illustrator; however, it's necessary to be done directly in Photoshop too, without the need to back-and-forth from there.

1
jane-e
Forum|Forum|9 months ago
karinr70603601
karinr70603601Participating Frequently

P: Progress bar for CPU consuming tasksOpen for Voting

When applying tasks to a larger collection of images this might take a considerable amount of time and CPU capacity. In the meanwhile I can instruct LR to do some other taskes. This might impose a very high stress on CPU. Therefore I would like to know if one task has finished before I start another task. For instance.: I like to start with applying all my images with auto AI settings as a starting point and to do a denoise for all images with higher iso values. Both of them are CPU consuming tasks if there are a lot of images. I would like to know if one task has finished before starting the other. I would like to be able to see a task queue and the state (percentage) of the task.

3
johnrellis
Forum|Forum|9 months ago
Re_p_g_cInspiring

filter/IA denoinse/ Dialog box issuesOpen for Voting

All recent updates including today's The dialogante box:Does not a default button.Enter does not workDoes not have a "don't ask again" box to be checked  Same to "IA fucus" filter option. Regards

1
CShubert
Forum|Forum|9 months ago
Burbank-611
Burbank-611Participant

Feature Request: Adding Transform Controls to Shape Properties PanelOpen for Voting

I could very well be mistaken (and if I am someone please let me know), but I'm reasonably sure that these Transform Controls/abilities are only available when transforming (Cmd T/Ctrl T). It would be helpful to also have them in the Properties Panel when shapes are "Live" (see attached pic). It would speed-up workflow.

2
Burbank-611
Forum|Forum|9 months ago
Vadym B.
Vadym B.Inspiring

Add the ability to mass disable effectsOpen for Voting

I don't understand why when selecting multiple effects you can't turn them all off at once? It can be done in AE, why doesn't it work here?I mean when multiple effects are selected the on/off only works for one effect, not the selected ones.Why not add this feature?

5
Warren Heaton
Forum|Forum|9 months ago
FreeTime
FreeTimeKnown Participant

Curves and pen pressure levels in PhotoshopOpen for Voting

Dear developers! Will we ever see these pen pressure settings in Photoshop?  

3
FreeTime
Forum|Forum|9 months ago
Jongkook_Lee5261

어도비 스톡 백터검색 없음Open for Voting

어도비  스톡란에백터란이 없음

2
Forum|Forum|9 months ago
mario293610831ai3

P: Show on-disk file size of smart objects and layers in Layers PanelOpen for Voting

Hello, I am experiencing a problem with a Photoshop file that is very large in size because it contains many smart objects and has large content. However, when trying to find which layer contains the large file, I cannot decide whether to delete it or rasterize the smart object layer because not all of those layers are unimportant. If the layer palette could display the file size of smart objects, it would be very helpful for me to take action to make it useful for hard drive space efficiency. Thank you.

1
Sameer K
Forum|Forum|9 months ago
julius_sKnown Participant

P: The filter mode selector should be white if it is actively filtering.Open for Voting

[Mod's note: Changing title and moved to Ideas board]   To recreate this issue: Create a new catalog Import multiple images Mark several images as picks Mark several but not all of the picks as 1 or higher stars Activate filtering on "Picks" Change the filter type to "less-than or equal to"    My expected behavior from this would be some visual indication that the star filter is active, and for there be a way to have the star filter mode set to "less than or equal to" without it being active. The actual behavior is that the star filter remains active even if none of the stars nor the mode indicator are white. If following the steps above, only the images that are "picks" but have no star rating at all are displayed.   This  is objectively confusing and creates situations where it is unclear what filters are active at any given time. At best it is inconsistent UI design, as the implied convention is that when a filter element is displayed as white, that indicates it is active, and when it is displayed as grey, that indicates it is inactive. The star filter behavior described above runs counter to this convention. If this is not a UI convention, then the design is poor and it should be corrected.   Edit: I realize that there is a difference between the star filter mode being inactive and active in that it changes from very dark grey, to dark grey. However the other filter elements change from dark grey to white, as do the flags themselves. These indicators are inconsistent and confusing. When "less than or equal to" is active with no flags picked, I don't think it could be argued that it appears to be active given the existing conventions. The filter mode selector should be white if it is actively filtering.

1
Forum|Forum|9 months ago
drew_6926

Add lil notesOpen for Voting

 As a student that uses Adobe premiere pro. I have lots on my projects like creating videos for assignments or at home hobby like youtube. I feel like it would be easier and simpler for navigating throughout parts of the videos if we could add notes like a little title where we can place the word intro or outro instead of searching for it or placing it above a higher level then others for example audio one to audio 2 

1
Warren Heaton
Forum|Forum|9 months ago
Ritwik371758731chiParticipant

Serious Editing Workflow Flaw: Ripple Trim Ignores Selected Clip in Premiere ProOpen for Voting

Dear Adobe Premiere Pro Team,I am writing as a long-term professional editor who uses Premiere Pro daily.There is a serious and fundamental flaw in Premiere Pro’s editing logic that has been ignored for years:Ripple Trim to Playhead (Shift+Q / Shift+W) completely ignores the selected clip.Instead, it always affects all targeted tracks, forcing editors to:Manually toggle track targetingTurn sync lock on/offBreak editing flow repeatedlyThere is currently no way to ripple trim only the selected clip, while keeping other tracks untouched — even though this is the most logical and expected behavior in modern editing.This is not a shortcut issue.This is not user error.This is a design limitation.Why this matters:Editing today is selection-based, not track-basedA selected clip should define the scope of an operationPremiere Pro still behaves like this is 2010Professionals are forced to use macros or AutoHotkey just to simulate basic behaviorMeanwhile:Core workflow requests like this remain unresolvedNew features are added while foundational editing logic is ignoredThis creates the impression that the real editing team is no longer listening to real editors.What we are asking (very clearly):Please add a mode or option where:Ripple Trim respects the selected clipOther tracks are not affected unless explicitly selectedTrack targeting and sync lock do not override clip selectionThis single change would immediately improve daily workflow for thousands of professional editors.We are not asking for experimental features.We are asking for basic, logical, professional editing behavior.Sincerely,A frustrated but experienced Premiere Pro user

3
Forum|Forum|9 months ago
Omer27585434zgsvParticipant

Premiere 25.6 Ripple Trim SucksOpen for Voting

I just wanted to voice my frustration with Adobe making Premiere more and more like DaVinci; first it was widenning the clips then adding borders to them and adding fx buttons etc simply taking up so much real estate, making it a chore to work with shorter clips. (I know where the fx panel is thanks)And now the way ripple trimming works got this treatment making it a visual nightmare. I updated my Premiere Pro and started a project, I attempted to ripple trim a clip and it got ate up in real time like my patience with this company. Tbh I don't know, maybe Adobe making it easier to swtich to DaVinci is a blessing in disguise, but as it stands I hate the fact that I cannot see how much trimming I'm doing clearly and there's no indiciation as such whether my trim is snapping to the playhead or not -there is a marker however that's only showing at the very top of the payhead not on the clip. This sucks.Adobe has been neglecting a lot of things and putting its focus on cosmetics that hardly improve its workflow if not making it worse. I'm not against change but I'm against the disconnect between me, a user, and Adobe who has been showing a lack of understadning of my needs in a way that can be discribed as dogmatic since they won't even have the curtosy to add options to customise these stupid feautres.I plead with Adobe to add an option to opt out of the ripple trimming feature the same way I can choose whether the playhead snaps or not.

5
Forum|Forum|9 months ago
talented_Sunflower2205

Neck SmoothingOpen for Voting

Everybody has face smoothing but nobody has NECK smoothing which is badly needed for people over 40.  The first app to have this will be hugely successful. It's not even that hard to program- use face recognition but NOT smooth the face, only the area UNDER the face. Its shouldn't be that hard to create such a feature.

0
Forum|Forum|9 months ago
Editing Ninja
Editing NinjaInspiring

Saved Swatches” row inside the Premiere Pro Color Picker (available everywhere)Open for Voting

Hi Adobe Team,I’d like to suggest an improvement to Premiere Pro’s Color Picker (the window where you choose a color and can type a HEX value). Please add a built-in “Saved Colors” / “Swatches” area directly inside this Color Picker, so we can quickly reuse our brand/client colors.What I’m asking for is a persistent list/row/grid of saved colors inside the Color Picker dialog (for example at the bottom). Then I can click a saved swatch to apply it instantly, instead of copy/pasting hex codes.This should work everywhere the Color Picker is used, not only for text. For example: Essential Graphics text fill/stroke, shape fills, strokes/outlines, shadows, color mattes, background colors, and any other place in Premiere that opens the same color selection window.Why this is needed: many editors work with several clients and strict brand colors. Right now we have to keep hex codes in Notepad, copy/paste constantly, or make workaround “palette sequences” and use the eyedropper. A swatches list inside the Color Picker would be faster, reduce mistakes, and keep branding consistent.Thank you.

0
Editing Ninja
Forum|Forum|9 months ago
Tom250845114j05

P: Seamless sorting in Lightroom (Cloud) Comparison ViewOpen for Voting

Hallo Zusammen, beim Aussortieren von Fotos nutze ich die Fahnen (Markieren / Ablehnen) in Kombination mit einem Filter auf „unmarkierte Fotos“, um nur noch offene Bilder zu sehen. In der Vergleichsansicht (zwei Bilder nebeneinander) verschwindet ein Bild sofort aus der Ansicht, sobald es markiert oder abgelehnt wird, da es den aktiven Filter nicht mehr erfüllt. Dadurch bleibt nur noch ein Bild sichtbar und der Vergleich wird unterbrochen. Um weiterzuarbeiten, muss man den Vergleich manuell neu starten. Wenn in der Vergleichsansicht ein Bild markiert oder abgelehnt wird, sollte automatisch das nächste passende Bild (gemäß aktivem Filter) in die Vergleichsansicht nachrücken, sodass der Vergleich ohne Unterbrechung fortgesetzt werden kann. Dies ermöglicht ein deutlich schnelleres und flüssigeres Aussortieren großer Bildserien und macht die Vergleichsansicht in Lightroom (Cloud) effizienter.Würde mich über eine Umsetzung freuen.Danke und viele GrüßeTom 

0
Forum|Forum|9 months ago

TIME REMAPPINGOpen for Voting

why adobe use too much parameteres for time remapping . other software has accepted that time remapping is necessary and they given basic time remapping  why always premiere behind that applications . whenever you have to do time remapping you have to marking at 2 sides drag it make it smoother ease in - out . every timeeee.. i mean dont this a big problem please adobe update it and make it easy please . thank you . i am usind adobe premiere 25.6.3windows 11 

2
Ann Bens
Forum|Forum|9 months ago
nilsohman
nilsohmanKnown Participant

P: Make it possible to move pages between booksOpen for Voting

For 15 years I've made a book with my best pictures and pictures telling stories of main events of the year and send it to family and friends. The books are made with exactly the same design and exported as a pdf. Now I want to make a Blurb book with all the pages from the last ten years. But I can't find a way to move pages between books – to accumulate pages from those ten books to a new one to be printed with Blurb. I would appreciate a way to move pages between books. It's OK if I have to reformat, but texts and images should be preserved. 

0
nilsohman
Forum|Forum|9 months ago
nfondi_0740Participant

P: Wall Masking tool request on LightroomOpen for Voting

I would like to request Wall Masking tool on Lightroom for real estate that can detect wall and adjust lighting, collor ect... and sky replacement.  [Moved to 'Ideas' by moderator, so other people can vote on it as well]

0
Forum|Forum|9 months ago
Typhonart
TyphonartInspiring

References outside canvasOpen for Voting

Ayooo, would it be possible to implement something in the lines of PureRef, but working outside the main canvas, without utilizing any artboards? Just press a button to enter the background area, copy and paste images and text to it, lock it and keep it there? Seems like a very simple thing to implement, and would be a huge quality of life improvement for anyone dealing with digital painting, ie entire design in gaming/movie industry in the world :dJust to visualise the idea: 

4
jane-e
Forum|Forum|9 months ago
KonaCoastMediaParticipant

Re: How too change the font size in application UI MenusOpen for Voting

I thought after my eye surgery this was not going to be a thing. My eyes are fine and the menubar displays at a 6 point font size. I have tried everything, UI interface, open/close. I've tried the .exe "system" setting which didn't do anything. This has been a long time issure for many. What I would suggest: Open up Word and at the bottom of the screen there is a slide bar. The text in the document can be adjusted to the users liking. Perhaps this idea could become part of the menubar in Adobe. Add a slider bar to adjust the menu font size to the users liking. I spoke to a support person and they told me that it Microsofts problem and all the settings had to be done through the Windows Settings feature. OR perhaps you could add a Zoom in / Zoom Out feature that we use in our browers, CTRL - and CTRL +. I have to say it is becoming unberable not to work normally. Let's start the new year, 2026, with larger menubar sizes! Thanks for listening from a long-time user (Macromedia) Happy New Year! 

0
Forum|Forum|9 months ago
Show more posts

Filter by product

  • All products
Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices