Build better products with our product team
Hi Everybody, Now if there's a way to do this, hoorah, but I really don't think there is and there should be. Photoshop needs to have linking capability similar to InDesign and After Effects where I can create an array of elements/objects and link them to various external images. Right now, in Photoshop if you Link to File (or Re-link to File) and you have four instances of this link, it will change all of the linked images. This is good, but if I have e.g. 4 different thumbnails (or storyboard frames) I don't want them all to change. The only way to create separation with this linkage is to flatten the image which is destructive and resets the scaling % and anything else similarly, fx etc. that was done to it which makes more work. So I then have to do that all over again or everything has to be embedded for every single instance. It would be SO NICE to just be able to "pop and swap" externally linked images to make an array without having to flatten and re-purpose each one. I've tried a number of things including embed file to reset it, then attempt to link to another external image. Photoshop still then re-connects all the other instances/objects to the original external image and converts/relinks them all. As far as I can tell, there's no way to do this and if I have an array of 24 externally linked images...that's a lot of work that would be a breeze if I could just swap out the externally linked image with another one using the push of a button and not change the entire set. Thanks for reading.
For the daily use of Stock, especially with a bigger team, it would be very valuable to have a filter within the search for the already licensed/downloaded pictures/videos etc. So that you could still use every filter and the normal search. With this feature, Stocks could act as an easy image database. The license-view is not useable for this as the pictures are way too small, you need to hover over those to see it accordingly, and you have only 10 pictures per side. Also, the marking of already licensed pictures is really hard to identify and could be optimized.
I'm a student and we use Adobe software like Photoshop, Illustrator and After Effects on the school computers. The problem is that we often use a different computer and I have to change the preferences every time. I know I can export the settings and all but it would be a neat feature to offer the option to sync them with the cloud, maybe with a main computer (home) as reference.
I have specific files that i use for most of my work. I would like to be able to have that as quick access without searching. The files need to be in the libraries because that is the way that I update the files for all of my team. This would be similar to the Taskbar pinning.
I was asked by support to share this:I wanted to use sensei - fullfilled all the requirements - but it didn't work since it apparantly doesn't function with clips that have audio other than in the english language. Since I would only need to AI to recognize pauses, it would be really helpful if Sensei could get updated to this next step - transcriptions are another level to this. So I hope the devs consider this mini-inbetween step and doesn't try to make a transcription service work in swiss german. Because that will never happen...
For speed it would be nice to have the option to just select the jpeg to import to Lightroom when tethering. The Raw would still be saved on my sd card , which could be used later if necessary for processing. At the moment you can either import the Raw or the Raw and the Jpeg, why not Jpeg only ?
I propose an enhancement for nested tracks in Premiere Pro. Instead of opening a new sequence on double-click, nested tracks would open directly within the existing timeline as secondary tracks (e.g., V1.1, V1.2, etc.). This would allow you to add or modify these sub-tracks without leaving the main timeline, making the workflow more seamless.This feature is already present in other software for managing complex effects, and integrating it into Premiere Pro would significantly improve project management.
Is there a way to normalize or match loudness a track on conditions? I.e.: only if track peack is higher than -2 normalize to -3, or similar...cheers
With the introduction of the Ki there is a problem that did not exist until then.When downloading and opening an image, e.g. from DALL-E in Photoshop, the prompts plus the dates are taken as file names. Classic view of multiple open files will display only two on the page header due to the length of the file names. So if you prefer the classic view, you must always open the drop-down menu of the opened files via the right arrows.My suggestion would be to introduce a window that, as with the layers, displays a preview of all open files, the size of which should be adjustable in the Preview.I think this would help users who have to constantly switch between many open files.Best regardsMarc
I’m aware that it’s possible to extend standard video and audio fades to the playhead, but only separately. For audio transitions, this feature is currently almost useless because there’s no crossfade option, and the fade always starts at 0 dB. In Avid, this function is called Head Fade / Top Fade and works for every activated video and audio tracks. It would be fantastic if this feature could also be implemented in Premiere.
One idea that has yet to be explored: have more than one trim path on the same shape/layer - like how the animation in the video at the 0:11 mark: www.youtube.com/watch?v=h89RKznjEgo Let me know what you think
I would like to see the scroll bars in Premiere Pro to be added back on the software.... the hand tool is not a good comprise.... Especially with a deep zoom-in. Thanks
I like to switch the Dual Brush setting on and off while painting to shift between a cleaner and more distorted texture. When turned off, the size of the Dual Brush stamp becomes unaligned from the main brush size setting when being increased/decreased, which means it must be manually reset when switched back on. This could be solved by a toggle to allow the size scaling to be maintained while the Dual Brush is switched off. Such options allow the brush engine to be utilised in more dynamic ways and are really beneficial for experimenting with how to get more out of it. Thanks for your time in reading,Oliver
Fit and Fill options in the properties box should work when video has been rotated. Not lock it back to previous orientation. If I have a clip for social and I need to rotated 90 degrees or -90 degrees that should lock so when clicking FIT or FILL it will adjust the scale only and not revert the rotation back to 0. Done with the new 25 Beta, Mac OS. Thanks for your time.
It's 2024, Ae has the blueprints for everything you could possibly want when it comes to the ability to create and animate masks, why are Premiere's tools still so primitive? I understand that you can just work between the two but that's not always ideal especially if you just need to mask one thing quickly. It doesn't make sense to have to use two different apps when the tools should exist in both. There needs to be a better way to control the size, shape, and animation of a mask. For example, when creating a rectangular mask why can't I just scale the entire thing up to fit the size of my frame instead of having to position each point individually? Having to move each point on its own means doing a lot of guessing as to where exactly they need to be especially since there is no real snapping in Premiere. Also, in the year of our Lord 2024, why can I still not adjust what kind of keyframes a mask uses? I'm stuck with only linear keyframes? Just because? So I'm stuck manually adding additional keyframes to make the mask follow the animation in my footage. Not ideal. Again, After Effects has none of these issues, and while I am aware I could just work between Premere and Ae, that's not an ideal solution for me and it severely gunks up my workflow. Having just a few simple features added to the masking capabilities of Premiere (scaling, bezier keyframes, etc) would be so incredibly useful and would save so much time and frustration. Honestly, it would be a dream if one day Adobe released something similar to Davinci Resolve. An all-in-one editing program where you could do both non-linear editing and motion graphics work without ever having to leave the one platform. But I understand that would be an incredible amount of work and why waste that time and money when people are happy enough using the two separate suites? But one can dream.
When editing something like a product photo, where the background is supposed to be all the same color and share, it would be really handy to have the avbility to "compare corners" somehow to ensure that you are even across the image. I'm picturing a square divided into 4, showing as much or as little of each of the corrisponding corner of the image that would allow you to see just how close or off each of the corners of the image is.
The new import window feels modern and has all the essential features. However for some one who is used to transcode footage or copy and create proxies at the same time this new import window is not usefull. I constantly have to use the media browser and use the ingest setting to either transcode or copy and create proxies. This is particularly a must for users with not so powerfull computers.
Please can we get better power tracking windows for colour like Resolve for isolating colour.
Hello Firefly Team! Thank you, first of all, for ALL YOUR HARD WORK and creating these incredible apps that are masterful works of art in and of themselves. That said, I would love the ability to save presets for Aspect Ratio, Content Type, Styles, Color and Tone, Lighting and Composition. That way, while working through these settings, if I find I like a specific combination of these settings (and would rather not start from scratch every time), presets would save me (and every user) time for continuous use, while allowing a smoother workflow. I believe this feature makes complete sense with regard to the feature progression of like applications by Adobe. Thank you for your time!
Is it possible to stretch the marker like in the video, the desired length of the video, touch the marker anywhere and let's say with the slash (/) key, mark everything under the marker automatically...thanks
When digitising art paintings by panning the camera - taking multiple shots - and then stitching them together with Photomerge, the resulting image usually contains significant concave distortion along the long edges (especially when the art has a high aspect ratio of 3:1 or greater). In ACR (as a filter) the distortion tool can straighten these curved horizontal edges well, but because it works in both planes simultaniously, this then results in the vertical sides (that were relatively straight to begin with) taking on a convex curvature. The only way I've found to adjust the image is to firstly get the "best compromise" to all edges in ACR using the distortion tool and then attempt to "fine-tune" the image using warp transforms. If the art being digitised is already framed then this technique doesn't work well because it's virtually impossible to get an edge perfectly straight using the warp transform (no matter how many adjustment handles I add). And even if the art isn't framed it's usually still necessary to crop a bit of the image off to straighten the edge out which is less than ideal. A simple (and near perfect) solution would be the addition of a control adjacent to the ACR (as a filter) distortion tool that allowed the adjustment to be applied to (*) Horizontal Only, (*) Vertical Only, or (*) Both. A second (and more complex) solution would be to introduce "square-up and straighten" functionality; perhaps in the same vein as the existing "select and mask" where (optionally) the 4 corners of the object are identified and the high-contrast edges "traced" to identify the edge to the algorithm that then adjusts the entire image in such a way that the edges are parallel and straight.
It is a common keybind that the TAB key would move your text cursor from the current field to the next text field.TAB is currently used to minimize panels. While this is useful it is a feature, it does not have a standard in software. Moving it to say the ~ key, that is not in use, would be the easiest change. It's right next to it. Texture work is becoming more advanced and more tools are being made to manipulate them, meaning we are now dealing with more fields then ever. Having to mouse over and click every field adds up. Users are easily losing hours over a project for useless mouse clicks. This might sound inconsequentially small, but it has a big impact in speed. Please include this digital standard.
Modulation of rotation along scatter on spline node - similar to how it works in tile sampler using a greyscale image to control the curve amount along the spline. Randomisation of start and end for 'Scatter on Spline' node - this would help for example when creating networks of branches for trees, giving a more randomized look. A way to mirror duplicates in the 'Scatter on Spline' node with offsets etc.
Need help please. Using a Samsung galaxy a9 tablet with the photshop app premium and it won't save a raw shot or convert into a jpeg at all
My request is for the Brush Tool, again! As I paint, I like to make frequent changes and tweaks to the brush engine as my needs and intentions for that brush develop; kind of like changing gears in a variably subtle or drastic manner. Saving the brush as a preset is not helpful because I adjust it so frequently. It would be very helpful to have the option to add an additonal or multiple Brush Tools to the tool bar, each with separate engines and mappable shortcuts, which could be rapidly switched between to grasp or fabricate a brush of a totally different nature without having to discard my previous settings before switching back again. In effect, I want to be able to suspend my current brush engine and use another without having to save the preset in the middle. I think many users could find employment for a Primary and Secondary Brush Tool option to very quickly alternate between the strengths of either brush without being slowed down by saving presets - or for helping to design complimentary presets simultaneously. The Mixer Brush is not a suitable alternative due to lacking Opacity controls. Currently I find using the Eraser on a transparency locked layer an almost convenient work around. Thank you for reading, I hope this suggestion ignites some consideration!Oliver
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.