Build better products with our product team
Is this the most bureaucratic feature in video editing? Why would a video editor click and select a clip without the frame appearing in the monitor for editing? Selection moves the playhead to the IN of the selected clip. Thanks!
It would be great to have an autosave option that works regardless of whether we've manually saved the project or not. I have autosave configured to run every 20 minutes, but I tend to save my project manually very frequently (every 5–10 minutes), so no autosave copies are generated.Sometimes I find that I need to recover something I deleted an hour ago, but I don't have any autosaved version available.
The search function able to identify different people. You can then name them and search for them in any shots they are included in. An extra layer could be their dominance in the frame, foreground vs background, large vs small, glasses or not, hat or not.
Adobe products should be easier to use without requiring extra work for the same result. Most notably, the sequencer features. Pro Tools figured this out 30 years ago. Smooth. Now you’re saying, well we don’t benchmark Pro Tools, because this isn’t a sequencer. Really? How hard is it to select all clips in a track? How hard is it to align the video clips to the audio track? I hope for easier features for editing music and brand videos.
When editing with photos and videos often we’ll shrink an image on a top layer incorrectly (v1 for instance). [Think 4K video on 1080P timeline 48% scale - the image on top does not fill the screen completely]. But because V1 image might be dark and it’s over “system black” (default layer) it’s tough to see. We then export the video and only notice that V2 isn’t sized large enough when watching playback. So we need to go back into Premiere and fix. When working with a lot of image resizes I often make an orange colored background and put it on v1, then do the rest of the editing on the layers on top (V2+). If any are not sized correctly I’ll see the orange and know to fix.Perhaps something like SAFE MARGINS that you can click on and off, yet doesn’t show up in the actual output.
This would be useful. The credits get used up so fast and we could do with some more. And a AI Character Generator would be cool for projects.
Bonjour, très souvent firefly me dit : "Un problème est survenu" je n'obtiens donc pas d'image mais mes crédits sont débités !
I tried a made video on the Kling 3.0 but unloading and im still waiting like 1 hour. Even if i refresh the firefly page it’s still loading. I can’t even try a make new video.
Bonjour.Etant un client d'Adobe Stock, il m'arrive souvent de tomber sur des images proposées dans les résultats de recherche dont la qualité n'est pas du tout au rendez-vous. Aujourd'hui, mis à part le forum, il n'est pas possible pour un client de les signaler.Exemple sur cette photo : N° de fichier : 304635841 Il faudrait avoir une solution plus simple pour les clients de pouvoir signaler une mauvaise qualité des fichiers proposés, depuis le panneau ''Report Issue'' par exemple qui ne permet que de signaler un abus de droits d'auteur ou de copyright à l'heure actuelle.S'il y a une autre méthode ce signaler ce genre d'image de mauvaise qualité évidente, faite-le moi savoir.Cordialement, T.R.
Reset Queue in Media Encoder will pull newly saved Premiere Pro project into Queue. Say I make a timeline of 30 promos in Premiere Pro (in/out and add a clock number to each promo) then I send each individual one to Media Encoder. Then I run Queue in ME and export everything. If there’s a problem with the promo and I fix the issue in Premiere Pro, I need to do all the above again with each of the 30 promos. You think there would be a way to ‘reset’ the Queue and when you run the Queue again it looks at your newly saved Premiere Pro project (with the promo fix) and them exports everything again with the fix.
Het gebeurt best vaak dat er geen output komt op een prompt omdat er ‘iets mis is gegaan’. En toch worden er keihard credits afgeschreven. Voor niks dus. Dat is vreemd en zou niet moeten lijkt mij.Je betaalt voor iets dat niet geleverd wordt. Zou ik met mijn klanten moeten doen dan ben ik ze zo kwijt...
Il y a des bugs incessants…probleme survenu. La moitié de mes crédits par en bug !!!
El adobe FIREFLY ha dejado de funcionar hace 4 días. Me da el siguiente error: HA HABIDO UN PROBLEMA, INTÉNTELO DE NUEVO MÁS TARDE.Tengo 8000 créditos y me he gastado 6680.Tanto Ilustrator, Photoshop y Indesing siguen funcionando sin problema.
The Sony A7Siii has the ability to add Shot Marks whilst recording video. Premiere Pro has no way of reading these shot marks. It would be great to have this metadata be imported with each clip? All the added Shot Marks should be visible in the Time Ruler of the Source window for quick access to these points in a long recording.
I have a large catalog and my workflow is this:Import photos onto my local computer. Store pictures in the Pictures folder in a subfolder with year/year-month-day folder structure. Edit my photos Move my photos to my NAS storage by dragging the folder in Lightroom to the storge drive. I have photos on the NAS going back many years. Dragging in Lightroom is a complicated process:Expand the NAS drive letter Expand the year target folder Roll up any other year folders because the list is extremely long Grab the folder and drag it down. The target folder is off the screen. Drag close to the bottom and get the list to start scrolling. Scroll scroll scroll until I get to the target year, and then release. In the middle of scrolling if I pause for even a moment, it will expand a year folder that is NOT the intended location. So I then have to scroll through all the photos in that year to move to the bottom of the list and get to the next year.All this maneuvering is done while holding the mouse button down and hopefully it doesn’t release. This is REALLY difficult to do on a trackpad on my laptop and a challenging operation for anyone who might require some sort of physical accommodations.Moving folders in the library module with a large catalogMy suggestion:Make a new menu item when right clicking on a folder in the Library module. The new menu item should read Move Folder .... The user should be able to select one or more folders for this operation. When the user selects Move Folder … a dialog box should show to say “Select target location”. It should be a parent folder selector that would use the standard “browse” or “save as” system dialog box to pick a folder. If you don’t use the system dialog box, make your own dialog box here that only includes folders that already exist in the catalog. If the solution is developed to use the standard system dialog box and the user adds a folder location that is outside the Lightroom catalog known folders then consider warning the user or adding the new location to the catalog automatically. Sample “select folder” dialog box in Windows When the user clicks Select Folder then each of the folders are moved in the same way as drag and drop in the application. Confirm the move as normal, move both single and multiple folders as normal.This solution should be much simpler to move folders in the catalog, especially with large catalogs, and especially for those that need accessibility assistance to not require the complicated click/drag/find your target and never let go operation that we currently use.Thank you for your consideration!
🎙️ Audio VST Effects like Duckers which I want to use for voiceovers need sidechain to work.(Lower music volume when voice is speaking)So please please Adobe, implement this normal professional feature in Premiere Pro.Thanks a lot. 😀Then I can use https://unitedplugins.com/VoxDucker/ finally.
I’d like to request a master catalog feature in Lightroom Classic that lets users browse thumbnails from multiple catalogs in one unified view without fully merging them.Why this mattersMany photographers organize work into separate catalogs for practical reasons such as client jobs, years, shoots, or business divisions. That structure is useful for performance and organization, but it creates a major drawback: there is no fast, visual way to search or compare images across catalogs. Right now, if I want to find a photo, locate similar shots, or review older work, I have to open catalogs one at a time, which is slow and inefficient.What I’m asking forA master catalog or global browser that can: Display thumbnails from multiple catalogs in one place. Search across catalogs by filename, keyword, rating, date, and other metadata. Let users filter by catalog, project, client, or folder source. Open the source catalog when a photo is selected for editing. Optionally sync or reference previews only, so the feature remains lightweight and does not require fully merging catalogs. Workflow benefitThis would make Lightroom much more practical for photographers who manage large archives, separate client work from personal work, or maintain catalogs by year or project. It would preserve the organizational benefits of multiple catalogs while solving the biggest downside: fragmented browsing and search.Suggested implementationA good approach might be: A new “Library” or “Catalog Hub” view. Support for adding multiple catalogs as indexed sources. Cached previews and metadata-only indexing for speed. An option to pin favorite catalogs for quick access. Why Adobe should consider itThis would reduce friction for advanced users, improve archive management, and make Lightroom a stronger long-term cataloging tool for professionals with large photo libraries. It would also help users avoid the need to merge catalogs just to find and review images efficiently.
Request: Allow Queueing/Batching for Generative Remove to Prevent Workflow InterruptionThe Problem: Currently, using the Generative Remove tool requires a strict "one-by-one" workflow. After painting a mask, navigating away to another image before clicking "Generate" discards the mask. This means I am forced to click Generate and sit waiting for the AI to process before I can move on to the next image.Because the generation process takes time, my entire editing momentum is derailed. The majority of my editing time is now spent waiting on progress bars rather than actually editing.The Solution / Proposed Feature: I would like to request the ability to paint Generative Remove masks on an image and navigate away without losing them, allowing Lightroom to cache or "hold" the pending mask.This change would unlock two massive workflow improvements: Asynchronous Editing: I could paint a mask, move immediately to the next photo to keep editing, and let the background generation happen without blocking my workspace. Batch Generation: Similar to how we can currently batch-remove distractions, we could mark removal areas across an entire photoshoot/set of images, and then initiate a single batch-generation command for all pending masks (e.g., during a break or at the end of a session). How this impacts my workflow: This single adjustment would be a massive game-changer for efficiency and user experience. Instead of being held hostage by individual AI generation render times, I could stay fully immersed in the creative flow of culling and editing. It shifts the AI processing from an active bottleneck into a passive background task, saving hours of cumulative waiting time on large catalogs.
I wish there was a way to accurately and quickly use color swatches from my Creative Cloud color library in my After Effects projects. I create digital assets for many different brands, so I have their respective RGB colors saved in my CC library. When I choose those swatches in Photoshop, the Hex codes are correct and the colors are accurate. The only way I've found to choose a CC library color swatch in After Effects is by using the eyedropper tool. While this generally works okay, there are certain colors that are inaccurate and the Hex codes don't match. I don't understand why it works fine in Photoshop but not in After Effects. Both working spaces are sRGB IEC61966-2.1 and both use Adobe color management. So the eyedropper function in After Effects needs to be accurate, or there could possibly be a swatches panel in After Effects...or something! Help me out Adobe, I can't be the only one struggling with this.
Let's say I wanted to storyboard a script and produce different angles of the same thing. It would be nice to have something that holds on to the core look and objects within the frame so we can get a wide, medium , and close shot of the same scene.
When I'm in Color Mode in Premiere Pro 26.5.0 (currently Beta), it would be nice to have a tracking button for the Object Mask Tool.Currently you have to open the Effects Control and go to Color Effect > Clip > Adjustment > Object Mask > Tracker.Since the Color Mode is a revamp version of the color mode, I think that the object tool selection is something to use all the time when color correcting stuff. To go to all that menues just to track, seems too much.When Toogling the Object Mask Tool, have a button somewhere, maybe like a Style Module, where you can track the subject and also change feather and stuff like that.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
OKSorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
OK