Skip to main content

Filter by idea status

10000+ Ideas

shanesmallshawParticipant

Bring back the old mask system.Open for Voting

I recently updated to Premiere Pro 2026 and went to create a mask. To my surprise and confusion, there was no option to do so in the Effect Controls. So, after being forced to research it online, I finally found that masks were inexplicably moved to the toolbar. Annoying and unnecessary, but whatever. I went to try keyframing the mask path… and nothing happened. I then had to conduct further research online to find out that, for some reason, I have to right-click on the mask and assign it to “Opacity.” Another extra step that makes no sense. So, I figured that it should finally work. Spoiler: it did not. At this point, I was enraged. Ready to punch my monitor, throw my PC out the window, mere seconds from a crashout. What else could I possibly need to do to create something so simple as an opacity mask? After consulting the internet for the THIRD time, I found that I’m supposed to switch the mask from “Frame” mode to “Clip” mode. Unbelievable. What is it with Adobe and fixing stuff that isn’t broken?! Why did you think anyone wanted this?!? Now I have to do 35 extra clicks to achieve something that took me two seconds before. I honestly think I’m going to roll back to the 2025 version because of this, and that’s because I know this post is pointless and no one at Adobe will actually listen to what their customers want. But this made me so furious that I had to unleash it upon you somehow. All I can hope is that other people like me will see this and find solace in the fact that they’re not alone. And for the love of god, stop forcing AI down our throats.

Edit 622937300yw0tParticipating Frequently

Create Multicam Source Sequence straight from an existing sequence like how you create a NestOpen for Voting

Hi,Currently, creating a Multicam Source Sequence requires selecting raw clips in the Project Panel, running Create Multi-Camera Source Sequence, and then editing the resulting multicam clip back into the timeline.If clips are already laid out on multiple video/audio tracks in a Time of Day sequence (e.g., synced manually or through Tentacle Sync Studio or Syncaila, via audio align, or during a rough edit), there is no direct way to bundle them into a Multicam Source Sequence right from the timeline. The only current option is Nest..., which creates a standard nested sequence, not a Multicam-enabled source sequence.I think we can all agree: nested sequences (and manually enabling the multicam function on them) are less reliable, less stable, and carry a much heavier performance overhead.Proposed Solution:Add an option in the timeline right-click context menu (similar to Nest...) called "Create Multicam Sequence".This should:Take the selected stacked clips on the timeline and wrap them into a Multi-Camera Source Sequence. Replace the original timeline clips with the newly created Multicam Clip (just like Nest... does). Preferably it uses the same set-up dialogue from within the project bin. What would be a great general fix (aside from this feature request), would be to be able to memorize the ‘Create single multicam source sequence’ check box. Right now you have to enable it manually every time you want to create a multicam source sequence.Why this matters:This would eliminate multiple tedious manual steps (finding clips in the bin, re-syncing in a new bin multicam, and bringing it back to the sequence) and drastically speed up multi-camera editing pipelines.Thanks!

Observations and Suggestions for ImprovementOpen for Voting

Hello, I'm new here and for fun I'm converting images and images to videos. I already have some experience from various free AI generation platforms. I understand that AI is still developing and that it sometimes doesn't understand my words completely. Therefore, I would suggest that there be an option to generate a rough preview before the main generation. Because even if I run the generation with the lowest computational power requirements and the result is acceptable, the next video will be generated again according to new algorithms and the result may differ. So either during generation, a number should be generated that will allow the video to generate consistently according to the same sequence. Or it should generate a preview of 1 frame per second.I understand that AI likes to make things up, but if a character is at the same distance in the original, it sticks to the concept, but as it gets closer, it invents interesting, even creepy things and creates characters that don't match the concept of the environment. "Basically, in ancient times, on a Greek frigate, Princess Jasmine from Aladdin appeared."https://prnt.sc/OsHyXy_Dg5b8I didn't find in the FAQ for partner models information about how much a credit costs for 1080p (approximately 120-130 credits/second), so please update it.I would very much like to ask you, raise your standards and add 10 or more seconds to your models, all AI models (image to video) commonly have this. I chose Adobe because you have long-term experience in graphic processing and have extensive expertise. I don't know whether you have your own computational power or if you purchase it, like other partner models, but based on reviews of other AI platform models, it's clear that you're excellent at this.I'll be happy to respond to your feedback.