I would like to request a new feature that would greatly enhance subtitle creation and viewer engagement in video editing: automatically animated subtitles with dynamic word-by-word highlighting synchronized to the speaker's voice.Feature Description:This feature would allow editors to import or generate subtitles, and have Premiere Pro automatically:Highlight each word as spoken, matching the timing precisely with the audio.Provide customizable animation styles for the highlighting (e.g., underline, color change, bold, scaling).Benefits:Improves accessibility and readability, especially for educational, social media, and interview content.Saves editors significant time compared to manual word-level animation.Makes videos more engaging and interactive, especially on platforms where subtitles are often watched without sound.Adds a professional polish to subtitle-heavy content without requiring After Effects.Thank you for considering this enhancement. It would be a game-changer for many content creators, educators, and editors working with spoken-word content.Like this video https://youtu.be/mKbRsediVEE
There should be a non-subscription option for light users who only use a coule apps a few times a year.Apps like acrobat, potoshop, indesign and illustrator should be avaiable for individual non-subscription purchase, for those who want to install and have the apps always ready for use without continued maintenance costs.This has been a majority request for years, your subscription model is universally dispsed.Why do you pretend to care what your commnity says, when you cherry pick what you were gong to do anyway?Please offer alterntives to subscription. I don’t want to subscribe to you, I just want to use your products, freely and in my own time.
Add a feature to jump to a certain time when you are editing a long videoShow the minutes remaining when exporting a videoTo put title to full video in 1 click lie CAPCUT lasting text
I recently updated to Premiere Pro 2026 and went to create a mask. To my surprise and confusion, there was no option to do so in the Effect Controls. So, after being forced to research it online, I finally found that masks were inexplicably moved to the toolbar. Annoying and unnecessary, but whatever. I went to try keyframing the mask path… and nothing happened. I then had to conduct further research online to find out that, for some reason, I have to right-click on the mask and assign it to “Opacity.” Another extra step that makes no sense. So, I figured that it should finally work. Spoiler: it did not. At this point, I was enraged. Ready to punch my monitor, throw my PC out the window, mere seconds from a crashout. What else could I possibly need to do to create something so simple as an opacity mask? After consulting the internet for the THIRD time, I found that I’m supposed to switch the mask from “Frame” mode to “Clip” mode. Unbelievable. What is it with Adobe and fixing stuff that isn’t broken?! Why did you think anyone wanted this?!? Now I have to do 35 extra clicks to achieve something that took me two seconds before. I honestly think I’m going to roll back to the 2025 version because of this, and that’s because I know this post is pointless and no one at Adobe will actually listen to what their customers want. But this made me so furious that I had to unleash it upon you somehow. All I can hope is that other people like me will see this and find solace in the fact that they’re not alone. And for the love of god, stop forcing AI down our throats.
Timeline folders. We have them in Animate, Photoshop, Illustrator... precomps can utterly ruin your work and is NOT an alternatives to having a simple folder hierarchy - especially when dealing with shape layers or anything that requires continual rasterization.
So some of the features on android are not there such as cropping, chroma key, and masking. I am making movie videos and I need masking. Thank you developers.
Photoshop’s Pattern Preview feature is great for Surface Pattern Designers… but is NEEDS the ability to create half drop repeat patterns… Affinity Designer has it, Photoshop NEEDS it!
As an artist, I want nothing to do with generative AI features or credits which are automatically added to my account. They are costly in terms of money and of the environment and as much as I enjoy using Photoshop, I want no part in that. Allow users to opt out of everything generative AI-related.
When working to make a short film, the length and quality of the video segments is key to making the overall story seem seamless. By adding Seedance 2.0 and 2.5 as a video model, it would allow users to create more dialog per video segment to allow for deeper and more cohesive video production without having to splice videos together for a character to complete their sentence of dialog or action sequence.
Most DLCs and other compositing software support OCIO 2.5+ configs now and it would be nice for After Effects to support them as well in the Custom OCIO Configuration. A popular example: Using Blender 5+ OCIO configs in After Effects.
I really hate how dragging to change values of different parameters is realized in Premiere. It changes EVERY single time I click it to type a value, so I have to make many more clicks to just type in a value I need. Why is this feature so sensitive? It should not move until you really click-hold and drag it, there should be some less sensitivity in that or this feature should be optional and be switchable in the preferences.Second: who tested it? Why is the draggable area so large and uneven? It should be just the size of the number box but instead it’s twice as wide.Because huge problems begin when the Effects window is narrowed to this:In this case you are not able to hit the Set keyframe or Go to the previous keyframe icons.
Please add a feature that allows us to "flatten" a cropped video, exactly like flattening a layer or converting to a Smart Object in Photoshop.Currently, if you crop a video unequally on the left and right, the blue selection box on your screen stays the exact same size as the original, uncropped video. This makes it impossible to just click and drag the cropped area cleanly, because Premiere still selects the hidden parts of the video.We need a built-in way to shrink the selection box so it tightly hugs only the visible, cropped area, allowing us to click and drag the cropped piece freely and smoothly around the screen with our mouse while resetting the center to zero.
Hello. I am contacting you regarding a refund for my subscription. I purchased the subscription and cancelled it shortly afterwards because it did not meet my expectations.According to the cancellation terms, I understood that I would receive a full refund if I cancelled before September 23. I cancelled within this period, but I have not received the refund.Please process my full refund to the original payment method and confirm the expected refund date.Thank you.
Subject: Request to link mobile number to account for active subscriptionDear Support Team,I have purchased a subscription using my mobile number, but I am unable to activate or use it on this app. The app currently only allows logging in or applying subscriptions via Email ID, and there is no option to link or use a mobile number.Could you please help me link my mobile number to this account or migrate my active subscription so that I can access the benefits?Thank youAadesh Meena [personal information removed by moderator]
Hi,Currently, creating a Multicam Source Sequence requires selecting raw clips in the Project Panel, running Create Multi-Camera Source Sequence, and then editing the resulting multicam clip back into the timeline.If clips are already laid out on multiple video/audio tracks in a Time of Day sequence (e.g., synced manually or through Tentacle Sync Studio or Syncaila, via audio align, or during a rough edit), there is no direct way to bundle them into a Multicam Source Sequence right from the timeline. The only current option is Nest..., which creates a standard nested sequence, not a Multicam-enabled source sequence.I think we can all agree: nested sequences (and manually enabling the multicam function on them) are less reliable, less stable, and carry a much heavier performance overhead.Proposed Solution:Add an option in the timeline right-click context menu (similar to Nest...) called "Create Multicam Sequence".This should:Take the selected stacked clips on the timeline and wrap them into a Multi-Camera Source Sequence. Replace the original timeline clips with the newly created Multicam Clip (just like Nest... does). Preferably it uses the same set-up dialogue from within the project bin. What would be a great general fix (aside from this feature request), would be to be able to memorize the ‘Create single multicam source sequence’ check box. Right now you have to enable it manually every time you want to create a multicam source sequence.Why this matters:This would eliminate multiple tedious manual steps (finding clips in the bin, re-syncing in a new bin multicam, and bringing it back to the sequence) and drastically speed up multi-camera editing pipelines.Thanks!
When can we expect generative expand as in ACR to be in LRC?
Once we have a new working folder on your hard drive, all future "save as..." in Photoshop will need to propose this new path as a priority. This would save us from having to retrace the entire path to make a "save as..." until Photoshop assimilates it.
Being able to pause during recording audio/ video would be great. As well as when editing actually cutting things out or clipping the video would work wonders.
The only choices today for managing previews are to set a fixed size limit (very useful if that drive doesn’t have unlimited free space) OR remove 1:1 previews after ‘n’ days. And if you set a fixed size, you get nagged constantly about increasing the cache size. First, why on earth can’t we have both choices active?Second, more options for how to manage the retention and discard of previews from the cache would not be especially complicated to implement but would speed editing. The principles of buffer management are common to many kinds of IT systems so there are many approaches - including algorithmic guesses at what might be viewed next - that would improve the chances that a suitably sized preview is found in the cache when needed.
Hello, I'm new here and for fun I'm converting images and images to videos. I already have some experience from various free AI generation platforms. I understand that AI is still developing and that it sometimes doesn't understand my words completely. Therefore, I would suggest that there be an option to generate a rough preview before the main generation. Because even if I run the generation with the lowest computational power requirements and the result is acceptable, the next video will be generated again according to new algorithms and the result may differ. So either during generation, a number should be generated that will allow the video to generate consistently according to the same sequence. Or it should generate a preview of 1 frame per second.I understand that AI likes to make things up, but if a character is at the same distance in the original, it sticks to the concept, but as it gets closer, it invents interesting, even creepy things and creates characters that don't match the concept of the environment. "Basically, in ancient times, on a Greek frigate, Princess Jasmine from Aladdin appeared."https://prnt.sc/OsHyXy_Dg5b8I didn't find in the FAQ for partner models information about how much a credit costs for 1080p (approximately 120-130 credits/second), so please update it.I would very much like to ask you, raise your standards and add 10 or more seconds to your models, all AI models (image to video) commonly have this. I chose Adobe because you have long-term experience in graphic processing and have extensive expertise. I don't know whether you have your own computational power or if you purchase it, like other partner models, but based on reviews of other AI platform models, it's clear that you're excellent at this.I'll be happy to respond to your feedback.
this is not for stock, but for acrobat. There were no options to leave a future idea for that...I want the “replace page” feature back. I have it on my desktop version, but it is gone in the online version. I use it all the time.
The Displace filter is extremely useful, but the methodology and interface feel super clunky and outdated.Having to create and reference an entirely separate PSD for the displacement map feels needlessly tedious and convoluted. There are already several other filters and effects in Photoshop that allow you to reference a layer (or layer mask) within the document, and Displace would greatly benefit from the same. This would help to streamline things and keep everything self-contained.Some kind of live preview would also be extremely useful, so we can avoid the endless trial and error that comes with the current version. Maybe even add a slider to adjust the fidelity of the map, similar to what happens when you blur the map currently.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.